Difference between revisions of "Talk:Modular Brain Theory"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Undo revision 92766 by 37.113.57.34 (talk) remove vandalism)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
The article could improve its purpose by explaining moon/selenite psychology as part of Moon medicine.
 
The article could improve its purpose by explaining moon/selenite psychology as part of Moon medicine.
 
--[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jose Giraldez]] 04:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jose Giraldez]] 04:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 
+
 +
:But that was not the interest of those who started the article.  They were interested in garnering political support for a moon colony or settlement rather than determining psychological considerations helpful to those living on the moon (lunatics<nowiki>[ joke]</nowiki>).  The problem with success in gathering such support from an army of true believers is that they would support a program even if it had no chance of economic success.  That would result in the eventual total discrediting of a moon colony program.  It is better to convince people of the actual rational basis for a possibly economic settlement so they will support only a program that is economic.  It is a bit of a tough sell. [[User:Farred|Farred]] 04:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 
----
 
----

Latest revision as of 02:56, 10 August 2016

Being technical people, we can build upon our new undestanding of how the human brain works to achieve our goals.

--Jriley 12:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The article could improve its purpose by explaining moon/selenite psychology as part of Moon medicine. --Jose Giraldez 04:24, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

But that was not the interest of those who started the article. They were interested in garnering political support for a moon colony or settlement rather than determining psychological considerations helpful to those living on the moon (lunatics[ joke]). The problem with success in gathering such support from an army of true believers is that they would support a program even if it had no chance of economic success. That would result in the eventual total discrediting of a moon colony program. It is better to convince people of the actual rational basis for a possibly economic settlement so they will support only a program that is economic. It is a bit of a tough sell. Farred 04:45, 16 April 2012 (UTC)