Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sandworm Design"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(The edit of user:24.61.142.2)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
==The edit of user:24.61.142.2==  
 
==The edit of user:24.61.142.2==  
 
The whole sandworm design concept may be unworkable, but the article should not be romoved without discussion.  The edit of user:24.61.142.2 on 12 Jan 2012 was improper.  [[User:Farred|Farred]] 18:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 
The whole sandworm design concept may be unworkable, but the article should not be romoved without discussion.  The edit of user:24.61.142.2 on 12 Jan 2012 was improper.  [[User:Farred|Farred]] 18:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
 +
Unfortunately the new radiation data from LRO has made it necessary to completely redesign the entire Lunar settlement we work up a couple years ago.  The danger to people from Galactic Cosmic rays is about twice what we had been counting on.  This means people will need 6 meters of regolith shield 95% of the time.
 +
 +
 +
This rework will take a great deal of work.  I would be most happy to discuss the problem in detail if you are interested.  It deserves its own Wiki entry.
 +
 +
--[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 21:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:59, 12 January 2012

Move to the Pole

This design could use a good rework for a polar location. The design of the thermal panels is also very weak. This would make a good student project.

Thanks, --Jriley 15:53, 15 March 2007 (PDT)


The edit of user:24.61.142.2

The whole sandworm design concept may be unworkable, but the article should not be romoved without discussion. The edit of user:24.61.142.2 on 12 Jan 2012 was improper. Farred 18:51, 12 January 2012 (UTC)


Unfortunately the new radiation data from LRO has made it necessary to completely redesign the entire Lunar settlement we work up a couple years ago. The danger to people from Galactic Cosmic rays is about twice what we had been counting on. This means people will need 6 meters of regolith shield 95% of the time.


This rework will take a great deal of work. I would be most happy to discuss the problem in detail if you are interested. It deserves its own Wiki entry.

--Jriley 21:59, 12 January 2012 (UTC)