<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://lunarpedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cfrjlr</id>
	<title>Lunarpedia - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://lunarpedia.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Cfrjlr"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/w/Special:Contributions/Cfrjlr"/>
	<updated>2026-06-10T23:05:43Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.34.2</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=114626</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=114626"/>
		<updated>2016-04-04T13:49:15Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[File:Sandworm vectorized 07.svg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance and compared to the abundance of Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]--------(6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] ----------(3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]]-(1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]]--(1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]]---------(1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]--------(500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerable quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere    &lt;br /&gt;
* Earth orbit and interplanetary Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer, and reaction mass (esp Methane and Ammonia)&lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Helium-3 for the Earth market&lt;br /&gt;
* water for use on the Moon and in Earth orbit and interplanetary spacecraft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To supply the present global demand of Helium-3 would require processing 30 tons per hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volatiles are released by heating the regolith.   Different volatiles are released at different temperatures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 300 deg C --- some Helium and Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
* 500 deg C --- CO2 and CO&lt;br /&gt;
* 675 deg C --- more CO2&lt;br /&gt;
* 700 deg C --- more CO,  Nitrogen, all remaining H2 and He&lt;br /&gt;
* 900 to 1,000 deg C -- Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,100 to 1,200 deg C -- basalt melts&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,455 deg C -- Nickel melts&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,538 deg C -- Iron melts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A process to separate the voltile consitutents could be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1) heat to 400 deg C, collect the H and He&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate H from He)&lt;br /&gt;
* 2) heat to 600 deg C, collect CO and CO2 &lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate CO from CO2)&lt;br /&gt;
* 3) heat to 675 deg C to collect more CO2&lt;br /&gt;
* 4) heat to 700 degC to collect CO, H, He, N&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate the consituents)&lt;br /&gt;
* 5) Heat to 950 deg C and collect H2S and SO2&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate H2S from SO2)&lt;br /&gt;
* 6) heat to 1,200 degC , separate remaining iron particles, cast the basalt into useful components, then cool slowly to anneal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fractional distillaiton would best be performed during the luanr night when ambient temperature falls, reducing the energy needed to condense the various gases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though nuclear fusion is not yet realized, there is already a strong market for Helium3 on Earth which might be enough to support a start-up robotic mining operation.  Refer to the detailed analysis at this link:  [http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium#Chronic_shortage_of_Helium-3_isotope_could_be_resolved_by_mining_lunar_regolith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21526</id>
		<title>In-Situ Propellant Production</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21526"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T20:02:41Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Methanol */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''In-Situ Propellant Production''', or ''ISPP'', refers to manufacture of rocket fuel from local resources, a subset of [[In Situ Resource Utilization|In Situ Resource Utilization (''ISRU'')]]. Production of rocket fuel from lunar resources would be a great boost towards self sufficiency for any lunar colonization effort, eliminating the need for costly imports of a substance which would be needed in large quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Oxygen]] makes up nearly half the mass of the lunar crust, and is expected to be a major byproduct of industrial operations on the moon. As oxygen comprises much of the mass of currently used propellant systems (as much as 80%), its production alone would cut down the amount of propellant that would have to be imported by a large factor. Manufacture of the remaining fraction from lunar resources is hampered by the fact that most of the substances used in the manufacture of terrestrial propellants are rare or nonexistent in the lunar environment. Hence, this issue has produced a number of unconventional proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hydrogen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hydrogen]]-[[Oxygen]] rockets have two main advantages in a lunar environment. First, the specific impulse (essentially the amount of thrust gained per unit of fuel burned) is listed as 450 seconds, the highest of any chemical rocket ever flown, meaning less fuel mass is needed compared to other fuel types. Second, hydrogen-oxygen rockets have been used since the first days of spaceflight, and as such the technology is well developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest disadvantage of this approach is the scarcity of hydrogen from lunar sources. Hydrogen is present at the poles in the form of water ice, as well as being available in the regolith in low concentrations (see [[Volatiles]]). The mining of water ice in the polar regions is complicated by very cold (100 K and below) temperatures. There is also concern about the depletion of these resources, as the exact amount available is not known. Extraction from the lunar regolith is an extremely energy intensive process, requiring the processing of massive quantities of lunar material at high temperatures. There is a great deal of doubt that these processes can supply the needs of lunar colonization.   Nevertheless, it might be commercially attractive, as pointed out by Harrison Schmitt in his book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
One way to address the great expense of extracting hydrogen from the lunar surface is to recycle the rocket exhaust of a [[rocket-sled to orbit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another scenario is that if volatiles from regolith are extracxted (e.g. for commecial Helium-3 mining) then Hydrogen will become adundant on the Moon, it is the most comment component of regolith volatiles.  Hydrogen is difficult to store, so might be best processed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO2 from the regolith which creates Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; )and water.&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO from regolith, which creates [[methanol]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Methanol ==&lt;br /&gt;
Methanol does not exist naturally on the Moon.   Yet it would be expedient to synthesise it as follows. Once volatiles are extracted from lunar regolith, large quantities of Carbon Monoxide (CO) will be released, together with a large quantity of Hydrogen.   Both hydrogen and CO are difficult to store.   Methanol is produced by heating hydrogen and nitrogen in the presence of certain catalysts.      In that case it might be very efficient to use Methanol as fuel for chemical rockets.    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ammonia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Ammonia does not exist naturally on the Moon.   Yet it would be expedient to synthesise it as follows. Once volatiles are extracted from lunar regolith, some nitrogen will be released, together with a large quantity of Hydrogen.   Both hydrogen and Nitrogen are difficult to store.   Ammonia can be produced by heating hydrogen and nitrogen in the presence of certain catalysts.     &lt;br /&gt;
In that case it might be very efficient to use Amonia as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ammonia of course has many other uses, such as a refrigerant fluid, important for heat engines and temperature control in space and on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Methane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has also been proposed as a fuel for lunar use. Carbon is present in the lunar regolith in concentrations several times that of hydrogen, and heating the regolith to extract volatiles would result in some methane being produced, along with carbon monoxide and dioxide (which could be converted to methane by [[Lunar_Carbon_Production#Sabatier_Reaction|reacting with hydrogen]]). Burning methane with oxygen would give a specific impulse of around 300 seconds, requiring more fuel than a hydrogen-oxygen rocket. However, methane is only about 25% hydrogen by weight, and using methane as fuel results in about a 50% reduction in the amount of hydrogen needed for a given launch mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Methane would be plentiful once volatiles are extracted  from lunar regolith.    Indeed it might be more plentiful than oxygen,   In that case it might be very efficient to use CH4 as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Another alternative is to combine lunar obtained hydrogen with silicon to create silane ([[Silicon|Si]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), which when burned with oxygen would produce water and silica as exhaust. The specific impulse of silane is slightly less than methane, and would use slightly less hydrogen for a given launch weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Silane holds an advantage over methane as silicon is vastly more plentiful than carbon (nearly 25% of the moons crust). In addition, technology for using silane as propellant is currently utilized in supersonic ramjets, where it is used as a starting propellant since it ignites spontaneously in air. As such, technology for handling and injecting silane into a combustion chamber is already developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One disadvantage of this approach is the complexity of producing silane. The process used terrestrially for silane production is long, rather complex, and requires a number of reagents that are quite rare on the moon. Methane and hydrogen production are quite straightforward by comparison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sulfur ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another proposed solution is to use [[sulfur]] as a propellant, in what is sometimes referred to as a &amp;quot;Brimstone Rocket&amp;quot;. Sulfur melts at about 115 °C, which could be easily achieved by preheating the fuel tank before launch. Burning this molten sulfur with liquid oxygen would produce sulfur dioxide as exhaust, with a specific impulse of around 285 seconds. Sulfur is present in the lunar regolith in much higher quantities than both hydrogen and carbon, some mare soils containing as much as .27% by weight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00261154.pdf V. T. Vaniman, D. R. Pettit, G. Heiken. &amp;quot;Uses of Lunar Sulfur&amp;quot; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1988]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In addition, unlike [[hydrogen]] and [[carbon]], [[sulfur]] compounds may be extractable by magnetic benefication rather than heating the regolith, greatly reducing both the complexity and energy requirements of gathering them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aluminum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is is proposed that [[aluminum]] could be used as a fuel. This would have the advantage of virtual inexhaustability, as aluminum makes up a significant percentage of the moons crust. One downside is aluminum's high melting point(compared to other propellants), which would make conventional bi-propellant fuel processes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One proposed solution to this problem is to mix finely powdered aluminum with liquid oxygen, adding a small amount of fumed silica to the mix. The result would be a gelled monopropellant which would provide an estimated specific impulse of 285 seconds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/095/al-o-propellants.html Larry Jay Friesen. &amp;quot;LUNAR ALUMINUM and OXYGEN PROPELLANTS to SUPPORT LUNAR BASES and PLANETARY FLIGHT&amp;quot;. Moon Miners Manifesto #95, May 1996]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the same as with sulfur. This approach has been tested on a small scale, and was determined to be reasonably stable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wickmanspacecraft.com/moon1.html John Wickman. &amp;quot;Using Lunar Soil For Propellants &amp;amp; Concrete&amp;quot;. Wickman Spacecraft &amp;amp; Propulsion Company]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One potential issue with this approach is the production of dust. As the exhaust cools, particles of aluminum oxide would form, which could be an issue for heavy use. Proper design of the engine could mitigate this however. If the combustion was complete and all products were entirely vaporized upon ejection, the resulting dust should be quite small, perhaps microscopic in size, and traveling at sufficient speed to allow for wide dispersal. Current spacecraft are already designed to handle dust of this size, and its generation should not endanger their use.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Silicon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar [[silicon]] could possibly be used in the same manner as [[aluminum]], as they are similar in both atomic weight and potential energy, and hence could have similar specific impulses. Silicon has been utilized in test mixtures, powdered and mixed in a liquid oxygen gel as with aluminum&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ae-www.technion.ac.il/~rocketw3/benny5.pdf Benveniste Natan and Shai Rahimi. &amp;quot;THE STATUS OF GEL PROPELLANTS IN YEAR 2000&amp;quot;. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. Table 6]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As silicon dioxide is the most common component of the lunar crust (nearly half by weight), it's use in this manner is attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Liquid Metal Alloy Oxygen Rocket== &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Another possible solution to the high melting point of Aluminum is to alloy it with portions of calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and silicon to get a low enough melting point for the alloy for convenient use while still using materials that are relatively abundant on Luna.  As a bi-propellant this alloy would need to be mixed with a large excess of oxygen for combustion to provide sufficient gas for a working fluid to expand as exhaust through a bell nozzle.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The proportions of the various metal components of the liquid fuel would be determined by the cost and availability of each component on the moon and its contribution to keeping a low melting point and providing high specific impulse.  NaK eutectic mixture is 22% sodium and 78% potassium.  It melts at 9.4 degrees Farenheit or -12.6 degrees Celsius.  So it is certainly not a difficult mixture to keep at a temperature at which it remains liquid to be handled by rocket engine turbo pumps.  Aluminum and magnesium would raise the melting temperature of the alloy but would be added for the high energy they provide when burned in oxygen and their relative local abundance.  Silicon would be added in such a proportion as would lower the melting point in a cost effective way.  The whole alloy would be maintained in the fuel tank at a temperature well above its melting point to be sure that some local variation did not cause plating out of a higher melting composition.  Multiple sheets of aluminum foil in lunar vacuum would provide adequate insulation so that the liquid metal fuel and the liquid oxygen would each stay at its proper temperature until pumped into the combustion chamber to be burned.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==See Also== &lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Propulsion Systems]] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Boosters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Industrial Production]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Space Transport]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21525</id>
		<title>In-Situ Propellant Production</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21525"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:59:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Hydrogen */  methane ref&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''In-Situ Propellant Production''', or ''ISPP'', refers to manufacture of rocket fuel from local resources, a subset of [[In Situ Resource Utilization|In Situ Resource Utilization (''ISRU'')]]. Production of rocket fuel from lunar resources would be a great boost towards self sufficiency for any lunar colonization effort, eliminating the need for costly imports of a substance which would be needed in large quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Oxygen]] makes up nearly half the mass of the lunar crust, and is expected to be a major byproduct of industrial operations on the moon. As oxygen comprises much of the mass of currently used propellant systems (as much as 80%), its production alone would cut down the amount of propellant that would have to be imported by a large factor. Manufacture of the remaining fraction from lunar resources is hampered by the fact that most of the substances used in the manufacture of terrestrial propellants are rare or nonexistent in the lunar environment. Hence, this issue has produced a number of unconventional proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hydrogen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hydrogen]]-[[Oxygen]] rockets have two main advantages in a lunar environment. First, the specific impulse (essentially the amount of thrust gained per unit of fuel burned) is listed as 450 seconds, the highest of any chemical rocket ever flown, meaning less fuel mass is needed compared to other fuel types. Second, hydrogen-oxygen rockets have been used since the first days of spaceflight, and as such the technology is well developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest disadvantage of this approach is the scarcity of hydrogen from lunar sources. Hydrogen is present at the poles in the form of water ice, as well as being available in the regolith in low concentrations (see [[Volatiles]]). The mining of water ice in the polar regions is complicated by very cold (100 K and below) temperatures. There is also concern about the depletion of these resources, as the exact amount available is not known. Extraction from the lunar regolith is an extremely energy intensive process, requiring the processing of massive quantities of lunar material at high temperatures. There is a great deal of doubt that these processes can supply the needs of lunar colonization.   Nevertheless, it might be commercially attractive, as pointed out by Harrison Schmitt in his book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
One way to address the great expense of extracting hydrogen from the lunar surface is to recycle the rocket exhaust of a [[rocket-sled to orbit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another scenario is that if volatiles from regolith are extracxted (e.g. for commecial Helium-3 mining) then Hydrogen will become adundant on the Moon, it is the most comment component of regolith volatiles.  Hydrogen is difficult to store, so might be best processed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO2 from the regolith which creates Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; )and water.&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO from regolith, which creates [[methanol]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ammonia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Ammonia does not exist naturally on the Moon.   Yet it would be expedient to synthesise it as follows. Once volatiles are extracted from lunar regolith, some nitrogen will be released, together with a large quantity of Hydrogen.   Both hydrogen and Nitrogen are difficult to store.   Ammonia can be produced by heating hydrogen and nitrogen in the presence of certain catalysts.     &lt;br /&gt;
In that case it might be very efficient to use Amonia as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ammonia of course has many other uses, such as a refrigerant fluid, important for heat engines and temperature control in space and on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Methane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has also been proposed as a fuel for lunar use. Carbon is present in the lunar regolith in concentrations several times that of hydrogen, and heating the regolith to extract volatiles would result in some methane being produced, along with carbon monoxide and dioxide (which could be converted to methane by [[Lunar_Carbon_Production#Sabatier_Reaction|reacting with hydrogen]]). Burning methane with oxygen would give a specific impulse of around 300 seconds, requiring more fuel than a hydrogen-oxygen rocket. However, methane is only about 25% hydrogen by weight, and using methane as fuel results in about a 50% reduction in the amount of hydrogen needed for a given launch mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Methane would be plentiful once volatiles are extracted  from lunar regolith.    Indeed it might be more plentiful than oxygen,   In that case it might be very efficient to use CH4 as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Another alternative is to combine lunar obtained hydrogen with silicon to create silane ([[Silicon|Si]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), which when burned with oxygen would produce water and silica as exhaust. The specific impulse of silane is slightly less than methane, and would use slightly less hydrogen for a given launch weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Silane holds an advantage over methane as silicon is vastly more plentiful than carbon (nearly 25% of the moons crust). In addition, technology for using silane as propellant is currently utilized in supersonic ramjets, where it is used as a starting propellant since it ignites spontaneously in air. As such, technology for handling and injecting silane into a combustion chamber is already developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One disadvantage of this approach is the complexity of producing silane. The process used terrestrially for silane production is long, rather complex, and requires a number of reagents that are quite rare on the moon. Methane and hydrogen production are quite straightforward by comparison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sulfur ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another proposed solution is to use [[sulfur]] as a propellant, in what is sometimes referred to as a &amp;quot;Brimstone Rocket&amp;quot;. Sulfur melts at about 115 °C, which could be easily achieved by preheating the fuel tank before launch. Burning this molten sulfur with liquid oxygen would produce sulfur dioxide as exhaust, with a specific impulse of around 285 seconds. Sulfur is present in the lunar regolith in much higher quantities than both hydrogen and carbon, some mare soils containing as much as .27% by weight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00261154.pdf V. T. Vaniman, D. R. Pettit, G. Heiken. &amp;quot;Uses of Lunar Sulfur&amp;quot; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1988]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In addition, unlike [[hydrogen]] and [[carbon]], [[sulfur]] compounds may be extractable by magnetic benefication rather than heating the regolith, greatly reducing both the complexity and energy requirements of gathering them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aluminum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is is proposed that [[aluminum]] could be used as a fuel. This would have the advantage of virtual inexhaustability, as aluminum makes up a significant percentage of the moons crust. One downside is aluminum's high melting point(compared to other propellants), which would make conventional bi-propellant fuel processes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One proposed solution to this problem is to mix finely powdered aluminum with liquid oxygen, adding a small amount of fumed silica to the mix. The result would be a gelled monopropellant which would provide an estimated specific impulse of 285 seconds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/095/al-o-propellants.html Larry Jay Friesen. &amp;quot;LUNAR ALUMINUM and OXYGEN PROPELLANTS to SUPPORT LUNAR BASES and PLANETARY FLIGHT&amp;quot;. Moon Miners Manifesto #95, May 1996]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the same as with sulfur. This approach has been tested on a small scale, and was determined to be reasonably stable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wickmanspacecraft.com/moon1.html John Wickman. &amp;quot;Using Lunar Soil For Propellants &amp;amp; Concrete&amp;quot;. Wickman Spacecraft &amp;amp; Propulsion Company]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One potential issue with this approach is the production of dust. As the exhaust cools, particles of aluminum oxide would form, which could be an issue for heavy use. Proper design of the engine could mitigate this however. If the combustion was complete and all products were entirely vaporized upon ejection, the resulting dust should be quite small, perhaps microscopic in size, and traveling at sufficient speed to allow for wide dispersal. Current spacecraft are already designed to handle dust of this size, and its generation should not endanger their use.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Silicon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar [[silicon]] could possibly be used in the same manner as [[aluminum]], as they are similar in both atomic weight and potential energy, and hence could have similar specific impulses. Silicon has been utilized in test mixtures, powdered and mixed in a liquid oxygen gel as with aluminum&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ae-www.technion.ac.il/~rocketw3/benny5.pdf Benveniste Natan and Shai Rahimi. &amp;quot;THE STATUS OF GEL PROPELLANTS IN YEAR 2000&amp;quot;. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. Table 6]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As silicon dioxide is the most common component of the lunar crust (nearly half by weight), it's use in this manner is attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Liquid Metal Alloy Oxygen Rocket== &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Another possible solution to the high melting point of Aluminum is to alloy it with portions of calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and silicon to get a low enough melting point for the alloy for convenient use while still using materials that are relatively abundant on Luna.  As a bi-propellant this alloy would need to be mixed with a large excess of oxygen for combustion to provide sufficient gas for a working fluid to expand as exhaust through a bell nozzle.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The proportions of the various metal components of the liquid fuel would be determined by the cost and availability of each component on the moon and its contribution to keeping a low melting point and providing high specific impulse.  NaK eutectic mixture is 22% sodium and 78% potassium.  It melts at 9.4 degrees Farenheit or -12.6 degrees Celsius.  So it is certainly not a difficult mixture to keep at a temperature at which it remains liquid to be handled by rocket engine turbo pumps.  Aluminum and magnesium would raise the melting temperature of the alloy but would be added for the high energy they provide when burned in oxygen and their relative local abundance.  Silicon would be added in such a proportion as would lower the melting point in a cost effective way.  The whole alloy would be maintained in the fuel tank at a temperature well above its melting point to be sure that some local variation did not cause plating out of a higher melting composition.  Multiple sheets of aluminum foil in lunar vacuum would provide adequate insulation so that the liquid metal fuel and the liquid oxygen would each stay at its proper temperature until pumped into the combustion chamber to be burned.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==See Also== &lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Propulsion Systems]] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Boosters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Industrial Production]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Space Transport]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21524</id>
		<title>In-Situ Propellant Production</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21524"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:57:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Ammonia */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''In-Situ Propellant Production''', or ''ISPP'', refers to manufacture of rocket fuel from local resources, a subset of [[In Situ Resource Utilization|In Situ Resource Utilization (''ISRU'')]]. Production of rocket fuel from lunar resources would be a great boost towards self sufficiency for any lunar colonization effort, eliminating the need for costly imports of a substance which would be needed in large quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Oxygen]] makes up nearly half the mass of the lunar crust, and is expected to be a major byproduct of industrial operations on the moon. As oxygen comprises much of the mass of currently used propellant systems (as much as 80%), its production alone would cut down the amount of propellant that would have to be imported by a large factor. Manufacture of the remaining fraction from lunar resources is hampered by the fact that most of the substances used in the manufacture of terrestrial propellants are rare or nonexistent in the lunar environment. Hence, this issue has produced a number of unconventional proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hydrogen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hydrogen]]-[[Oxygen]] rockets have two main advantages in a lunar environment. First, the specific impulse (essentially the amount of thrust gained per unit of fuel burned) is listed as 450 seconds, the highest of any chemical rocket ever flown, meaning less fuel mass is needed compared to other fuel types. Second, hydrogen-oxygen rockets have been used since the first days of spaceflight, and as such the technology is well developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest disadvantage of this approach is the scarcity of hydrogen from lunar sources. Hydrogen is present at the poles in the form of water ice, as well as being available in the regolith in low concentrations (see [[Volatiles]]). The mining of water ice in the polar regions is complicated by very cold (100 K and below) temperatures. There is also concern about the depletion of these resources, as the exact amount available is not known. Extraction from the lunar regolith is an extremely energy intensive process, requiring the processing of massive quantities of lunar material at high temperatures. There is a great deal of doubt that these processes can supply the needs of lunar colonization.   Nevertheless, it might be commercially attractive, as pointed out by Harrison Schmitt in his book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
One way to address the great expense of extracting hydrogen from the lunar surface is to recycle the rocket exhaust of a [[rocket-sled to orbit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another scenario is that if volatiles from regolith are extracxted (e.g. for commecial Helium-3 mining) then Hydrogen will become adundant on the Moon, it is the most comment component of regolith volatiles.  Hydrogen is difficult to store, so might be best processed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO2 from the regolith which creates [[methane]] and water.&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO from regolith, which creates [[methanol]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Ammonia ==&lt;br /&gt;
Ammonia does not exist naturally on the Moon.   Yet it would be expedient to synthesise it as follows. Once volatiles are extracted from lunar regolith, some nitrogen will be released, together with a large quantity of Hydrogen.   Both hydrogen and Nitrogen are difficult to store.   Ammonia can be produced by heating hydrogen and nitrogen in the presence of certain catalysts.     &lt;br /&gt;
In that case it might be very efficient to use Amonia as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ammonia of course has many other uses, such as a refrigerant fluid, important for heat engines and temperature control in space and on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Methane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has also been proposed as a fuel for lunar use. Carbon is present in the lunar regolith in concentrations several times that of hydrogen, and heating the regolith to extract volatiles would result in some methane being produced, along with carbon monoxide and dioxide (which could be converted to methane by [[Lunar_Carbon_Production#Sabatier_Reaction|reacting with hydrogen]]). Burning methane with oxygen would give a specific impulse of around 300 seconds, requiring more fuel than a hydrogen-oxygen rocket. However, methane is only about 25% hydrogen by weight, and using methane as fuel results in about a 50% reduction in the amount of hydrogen needed for a given launch mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Methane would be plentiful once volatiles are extracted  from lunar regolith.    Indeed it might be more plentiful than oxygen,   In that case it might be very efficient to use CH4 as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Another alternative is to combine lunar obtained hydrogen with silicon to create silane ([[Silicon|Si]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), which when burned with oxygen would produce water and silica as exhaust. The specific impulse of silane is slightly less than methane, and would use slightly less hydrogen for a given launch weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Silane holds an advantage over methane as silicon is vastly more plentiful than carbon (nearly 25% of the moons crust). In addition, technology for using silane as propellant is currently utilized in supersonic ramjets, where it is used as a starting propellant since it ignites spontaneously in air. As such, technology for handling and injecting silane into a combustion chamber is already developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One disadvantage of this approach is the complexity of producing silane. The process used terrestrially for silane production is long, rather complex, and requires a number of reagents that are quite rare on the moon. Methane and hydrogen production are quite straightforward by comparison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sulfur ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another proposed solution is to use [[sulfur]] as a propellant, in what is sometimes referred to as a &amp;quot;Brimstone Rocket&amp;quot;. Sulfur melts at about 115 °C, which could be easily achieved by preheating the fuel tank before launch. Burning this molten sulfur with liquid oxygen would produce sulfur dioxide as exhaust, with a specific impulse of around 285 seconds. Sulfur is present in the lunar regolith in much higher quantities than both hydrogen and carbon, some mare soils containing as much as .27% by weight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00261154.pdf V. T. Vaniman, D. R. Pettit, G. Heiken. &amp;quot;Uses of Lunar Sulfur&amp;quot; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1988]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In addition, unlike [[hydrogen]] and [[carbon]], [[sulfur]] compounds may be extractable by magnetic benefication rather than heating the regolith, greatly reducing both the complexity and energy requirements of gathering them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aluminum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is is proposed that [[aluminum]] could be used as a fuel. This would have the advantage of virtual inexhaustability, as aluminum makes up a significant percentage of the moons crust. One downside is aluminum's high melting point(compared to other propellants), which would make conventional bi-propellant fuel processes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One proposed solution to this problem is to mix finely powdered aluminum with liquid oxygen, adding a small amount of fumed silica to the mix. The result would be a gelled monopropellant which would provide an estimated specific impulse of 285 seconds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/095/al-o-propellants.html Larry Jay Friesen. &amp;quot;LUNAR ALUMINUM and OXYGEN PROPELLANTS to SUPPORT LUNAR BASES and PLANETARY FLIGHT&amp;quot;. Moon Miners Manifesto #95, May 1996]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the same as with sulfur. This approach has been tested on a small scale, and was determined to be reasonably stable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wickmanspacecraft.com/moon1.html John Wickman. &amp;quot;Using Lunar Soil For Propellants &amp;amp; Concrete&amp;quot;. Wickman Spacecraft &amp;amp; Propulsion Company]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One potential issue with this approach is the production of dust. As the exhaust cools, particles of aluminum oxide would form, which could be an issue for heavy use. Proper design of the engine could mitigate this however. If the combustion was complete and all products were entirely vaporized upon ejection, the resulting dust should be quite small, perhaps microscopic in size, and traveling at sufficient speed to allow for wide dispersal. Current spacecraft are already designed to handle dust of this size, and its generation should not endanger their use.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Silicon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar [[silicon]] could possibly be used in the same manner as [[aluminum]], as they are similar in both atomic weight and potential energy, and hence could have similar specific impulses. Silicon has been utilized in test mixtures, powdered and mixed in a liquid oxygen gel as with aluminum&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ae-www.technion.ac.il/~rocketw3/benny5.pdf Benveniste Natan and Shai Rahimi. &amp;quot;THE STATUS OF GEL PROPELLANTS IN YEAR 2000&amp;quot;. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. Table 6]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As silicon dioxide is the most common component of the lunar crust (nearly half by weight), it's use in this manner is attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Liquid Metal Alloy Oxygen Rocket== &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Another possible solution to the high melting point of Aluminum is to alloy it with portions of calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and silicon to get a low enough melting point for the alloy for convenient use while still using materials that are relatively abundant on Luna.  As a bi-propellant this alloy would need to be mixed with a large excess of oxygen for combustion to provide sufficient gas for a working fluid to expand as exhaust through a bell nozzle.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The proportions of the various metal components of the liquid fuel would be determined by the cost and availability of each component on the moon and its contribution to keeping a low melting point and providing high specific impulse.  NaK eutectic mixture is 22% sodium and 78% potassium.  It melts at 9.4 degrees Farenheit or -12.6 degrees Celsius.  So it is certainly not a difficult mixture to keep at a temperature at which it remains liquid to be handled by rocket engine turbo pumps.  Aluminum and magnesium would raise the melting temperature of the alloy but would be added for the high energy they provide when burned in oxygen and their relative local abundance.  Silicon would be added in such a proportion as would lower the melting point in a cost effective way.  The whole alloy would be maintained in the fuel tank at a temperature well above its melting point to be sure that some local variation did not cause plating out of a higher melting composition.  Multiple sheets of aluminum foil in lunar vacuum would provide adequate insulation so that the liquid metal fuel and the liquid oxygen would each stay at its proper temperature until pumped into the combustion chamber to be burned.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==See Also== &lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Propulsion Systems]] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Boosters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Industrial Production]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Space Transport]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21523</id>
		<title>In-Situ Propellant Production</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21523"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:52:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Methane */  methane as reaction mass&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''In-Situ Propellant Production''', or ''ISPP'', refers to manufacture of rocket fuel from local resources, a subset of [[In Situ Resource Utilization|In Situ Resource Utilization (''ISRU'')]]. Production of rocket fuel from lunar resources would be a great boost towards self sufficiency for any lunar colonization effort, eliminating the need for costly imports of a substance which would be needed in large quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Oxygen]] makes up nearly half the mass of the lunar crust, and is expected to be a major byproduct of industrial operations on the moon. As oxygen comprises much of the mass of currently used propellant systems (as much as 80%), its production alone would cut down the amount of propellant that would have to be imported by a large factor. Manufacture of the remaining fraction from lunar resources is hampered by the fact that most of the substances used in the manufacture of terrestrial propellants are rare or nonexistent in the lunar environment. Hence, this issue has produced a number of unconventional proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hydrogen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hydrogen]]-[[Oxygen]] rockets have two main advantages in a lunar environment. First, the specific impulse (essentially the amount of thrust gained per unit of fuel burned) is listed as 450 seconds, the highest of any chemical rocket ever flown, meaning less fuel mass is needed compared to other fuel types. Second, hydrogen-oxygen rockets have been used since the first days of spaceflight, and as such the technology is well developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest disadvantage of this approach is the scarcity of hydrogen from lunar sources. Hydrogen is present at the poles in the form of water ice, as well as being available in the regolith in low concentrations (see [[Volatiles]]). The mining of water ice in the polar regions is complicated by very cold (100 K and below) temperatures. There is also concern about the depletion of these resources, as the exact amount available is not known. Extraction from the lunar regolith is an extremely energy intensive process, requiring the processing of massive quantities of lunar material at high temperatures. There is a great deal of doubt that these processes can supply the needs of lunar colonization.   Nevertheless, it might be commercially attractive, as pointed out by Harrison Schmitt in his book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
One way to address the great expense of extracting hydrogen from the lunar surface is to recycle the rocket exhaust of a [[rocket-sled to orbit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another scenario is that if volatiles from regolith are extracxted (e.g. for commecial Helium-3 mining) then Hydrogen will become adundant on the Moon, it is the most comment component of regolith volatiles.  Hydrogen is difficult to store, so might be best processed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO2 from the regolith which creates [[methane]] and water.&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO from regolith, which creates [[methanol]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Methane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has also been proposed as a fuel for lunar use. Carbon is present in the lunar regolith in concentrations several times that of hydrogen, and heating the regolith to extract volatiles would result in some methane being produced, along with carbon monoxide and dioxide (which could be converted to methane by [[Lunar_Carbon_Production#Sabatier_Reaction|reacting with hydrogen]]). Burning methane with oxygen would give a specific impulse of around 300 seconds, requiring more fuel than a hydrogen-oxygen rocket. However, methane is only about 25% hydrogen by weight, and using methane as fuel results in about a 50% reduction in the amount of hydrogen needed for a given launch mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Methane would be plentiful once volatiles are extracted  from lunar regolith.    Indeed it might be more plentiful than oxygen,   In that case it might be very efficient to use CH4 as reaction mass for solar thermal rockets.    It would be a  somewhat lower specific impulse than hydrogen, but much easier to store than hydrogen, and no oxidizer is needed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Another alternative is to combine lunar obtained hydrogen with silicon to create silane ([[Silicon|Si]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), which when burned with oxygen would produce water and silica as exhaust. The specific impulse of silane is slightly less than methane, and would use slightly less hydrogen for a given launch weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Silane holds an advantage over methane as silicon is vastly more plentiful than carbon (nearly 25% of the moons crust). In addition, technology for using silane as propellant is currently utilized in supersonic ramjets, where it is used as a starting propellant since it ignites spontaneously in air. As such, technology for handling and injecting silane into a combustion chamber is already developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One disadvantage of this approach is the complexity of producing silane. The process used terrestrially for silane production is long, rather complex, and requires a number of reagents that are quite rare on the moon. Methane and hydrogen production are quite straightforward by comparison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sulfur ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another proposed solution is to use [[sulfur]] as a propellant, in what is sometimes referred to as a &amp;quot;Brimstone Rocket&amp;quot;. Sulfur melts at about 115 °C, which could be easily achieved by preheating the fuel tank before launch. Burning this molten sulfur with liquid oxygen would produce sulfur dioxide as exhaust, with a specific impulse of around 285 seconds. Sulfur is present in the lunar regolith in much higher quantities than both hydrogen and carbon, some mare soils containing as much as .27% by weight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00261154.pdf V. T. Vaniman, D. R. Pettit, G. Heiken. &amp;quot;Uses of Lunar Sulfur&amp;quot; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1988]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In addition, unlike [[hydrogen]] and [[carbon]], [[sulfur]] compounds may be extractable by magnetic benefication rather than heating the regolith, greatly reducing both the complexity and energy requirements of gathering them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aluminum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is is proposed that [[aluminum]] could be used as a fuel. This would have the advantage of virtual inexhaustability, as aluminum makes up a significant percentage of the moons crust. One downside is aluminum's high melting point(compared to other propellants), which would make conventional bi-propellant fuel processes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One proposed solution to this problem is to mix finely powdered aluminum with liquid oxygen, adding a small amount of fumed silica to the mix. The result would be a gelled monopropellant which would provide an estimated specific impulse of 285 seconds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/095/al-o-propellants.html Larry Jay Friesen. &amp;quot;LUNAR ALUMINUM and OXYGEN PROPELLANTS to SUPPORT LUNAR BASES and PLANETARY FLIGHT&amp;quot;. Moon Miners Manifesto #95, May 1996]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the same as with sulfur. This approach has been tested on a small scale, and was determined to be reasonably stable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wickmanspacecraft.com/moon1.html John Wickman. &amp;quot;Using Lunar Soil For Propellants &amp;amp; Concrete&amp;quot;. Wickman Spacecraft &amp;amp; Propulsion Company]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One potential issue with this approach is the production of dust. As the exhaust cools, particles of aluminum oxide would form, which could be an issue for heavy use. Proper design of the engine could mitigate this however. If the combustion was complete and all products were entirely vaporized upon ejection, the resulting dust should be quite small, perhaps microscopic in size, and traveling at sufficient speed to allow for wide dispersal. Current spacecraft are already designed to handle dust of this size, and its generation should not endanger their use.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Silicon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar [[silicon]] could possibly be used in the same manner as [[aluminum]], as they are similar in both atomic weight and potential energy, and hence could have similar specific impulses. Silicon has been utilized in test mixtures, powdered and mixed in a liquid oxygen gel as with aluminum&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ae-www.technion.ac.il/~rocketw3/benny5.pdf Benveniste Natan and Shai Rahimi. &amp;quot;THE STATUS OF GEL PROPELLANTS IN YEAR 2000&amp;quot;. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. Table 6]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As silicon dioxide is the most common component of the lunar crust (nearly half by weight), it's use in this manner is attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Liquid Metal Alloy Oxygen Rocket== &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Another possible solution to the high melting point of Aluminum is to alloy it with portions of calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and silicon to get a low enough melting point for the alloy for convenient use while still using materials that are relatively abundant on Luna.  As a bi-propellant this alloy would need to be mixed with a large excess of oxygen for combustion to provide sufficient gas for a working fluid to expand as exhaust through a bell nozzle.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The proportions of the various metal components of the liquid fuel would be determined by the cost and availability of each component on the moon and its contribution to keeping a low melting point and providing high specific impulse.  NaK eutectic mixture is 22% sodium and 78% potassium.  It melts at 9.4 degrees Farenheit or -12.6 degrees Celsius.  So it is certainly not a difficult mixture to keep at a temperature at which it remains liquid to be handled by rocket engine turbo pumps.  Aluminum and magnesium would raise the melting temperature of the alloy but would be added for the high energy they provide when burned in oxygen and their relative local abundance.  Silicon would be added in such a proportion as would lower the melting point in a cost effective way.  The whole alloy would be maintained in the fuel tank at a temperature well above its melting point to be sure that some local variation did not cause plating out of a higher melting composition.  Multiple sheets of aluminum foil in lunar vacuum would provide adequate insulation so that the liquid metal fuel and the liquid oxygen would each stay at its proper temperature until pumped into the combustion chamber to be burned.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==See Also== &lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Propulsion Systems]] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Boosters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Industrial Production]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Space Transport]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21522</id>
		<title>In-Situ Propellant Production</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=In-Situ_Propellant_Production&amp;diff=21522"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:49:19Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Hydrogen */  from regolith - other uses&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;'''In-Situ Propellant Production''', or ''ISPP'', refers to manufacture of rocket fuel from local resources, a subset of [[In Situ Resource Utilization|In Situ Resource Utilization (''ISRU'')]]. Production of rocket fuel from lunar resources would be a great boost towards self sufficiency for any lunar colonization effort, eliminating the need for costly imports of a substance which would be needed in large quantities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Oxygen]] makes up nearly half the mass of the lunar crust, and is expected to be a major byproduct of industrial operations on the moon. As oxygen comprises much of the mass of currently used propellant systems (as much as 80%), its production alone would cut down the amount of propellant that would have to be imported by a large factor. Manufacture of the remaining fraction from lunar resources is hampered by the fact that most of the substances used in the manufacture of terrestrial propellants are rare or nonexistent in the lunar environment. Hence, this issue has produced a number of unconventional proposals.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Hydrogen ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Hydrogen]]-[[Oxygen]] rockets have two main advantages in a lunar environment. First, the specific impulse (essentially the amount of thrust gained per unit of fuel burned) is listed as 450 seconds, the highest of any chemical rocket ever flown, meaning less fuel mass is needed compared to other fuel types. Second, hydrogen-oxygen rockets have been used since the first days of spaceflight, and as such the technology is well developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest disadvantage of this approach is the scarcity of hydrogen from lunar sources. Hydrogen is present at the poles in the form of water ice, as well as being available in the regolith in low concentrations (see [[Volatiles]]). The mining of water ice in the polar regions is complicated by very cold (100 K and below) temperatures. There is also concern about the depletion of these resources, as the exact amount available is not known. Extraction from the lunar regolith is an extremely energy intensive process, requiring the processing of massive quantities of lunar material at high temperatures. There is a great deal of doubt that these processes can supply the needs of lunar colonization.   Nevertheless, it might be commercially attractive, as pointed out by Harrison Schmitt in his book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
One way to address the great expense of extracting hydrogen from the lunar surface is to recycle the rocket exhaust of a [[rocket-sled to orbit]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another scenario is that if volatiles from regolith are extracxted (e.g. for commecial Helium-3 mining) then Hydrogen will become adundant on the Moon, it is the most comment component of regolith volatiles.  Hydrogen is difficult to store, so might be best processed as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO2 from the regolith which creates [[methane]] and water.&lt;br /&gt;
* react hydrogen with CO from regolith, which creates [[methanol]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Methane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Methane ([[Carbon|C]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) has also been proposed as a fuel for lunar use. Carbon is present in the lunar regolith in concentrations several times that of hydrogen, and heating the regolith to extract volatiles would result in some methane being produced, along with carbon monoxide and dioxide (which could be converted to methane by [[Lunar_Carbon_Production#Sabatier_Reaction|reacting with hydrogen]]). Burning methane with oxygen would give a specific impulse of around 300 seconds, requiring more fuel than a hydrogen-oxygen rocket. However, methane is only about 25% hydrogen by weight, and using methane as fuel results in about a 50% reduction in the amount of hydrogen needed for a given launch mass.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Silane ==&lt;br /&gt;
Another alternative is to combine lunar obtained hydrogen with silicon to create silane ([[Silicon|Si]][[Hydrogen|H]]&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;), which when burned with oxygen would produce water and silica as exhaust. The specific impulse of silane is slightly less than methane, and would use slightly less hydrogen for a given launch weight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Silane holds an advantage over methane as silicon is vastly more plentiful than carbon (nearly 25% of the moons crust). In addition, technology for using silane as propellant is currently utilized in supersonic ramjets, where it is used as a starting propellant since it ignites spontaneously in air. As such, technology for handling and injecting silane into a combustion chamber is already developed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One disadvantage of this approach is the complexity of producing silane. The process used terrestrially for silane production is long, rather complex, and requires a number of reagents that are quite rare on the moon. Methane and hydrogen production are quite straightforward by comparison.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sulfur ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another proposed solution is to use [[sulfur]] as a propellant, in what is sometimes referred to as a &amp;quot;Brimstone Rocket&amp;quot;. Sulfur melts at about 115 °C, which could be easily achieved by preheating the fuel tank before launch. Burning this molten sulfur with liquid oxygen would produce sulfur dioxide as exhaust, with a specific impulse of around 285 seconds. Sulfur is present in the lunar regolith in much higher quantities than both hydrogen and carbon, some mare soils containing as much as .27% by weight.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://library.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00261154.pdf V. T. Vaniman, D. R. Pettit, G. Heiken. &amp;quot;Uses of Lunar Sulfur&amp;quot; Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1988]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. In addition, unlike [[hydrogen]] and [[carbon]], [[sulfur]] compounds may be extractable by magnetic benefication rather than heating the regolith, greatly reducing both the complexity and energy requirements of gathering them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Aluminum ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is is proposed that [[aluminum]] could be used as a fuel. This would have the advantage of virtual inexhaustability, as aluminum makes up a significant percentage of the moons crust. One downside is aluminum's high melting point(compared to other propellants), which would make conventional bi-propellant fuel processes difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One proposed solution to this problem is to mix finely powdered aluminum with liquid oxygen, adding a small amount of fumed silica to the mix. The result would be a gelled monopropellant which would provide an estimated specific impulse of 285 seconds&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.asi.org/adb/06/09/03/02/095/al-o-propellants.html Larry Jay Friesen. &amp;quot;LUNAR ALUMINUM and OXYGEN PROPELLANTS to SUPPORT LUNAR BASES and PLANETARY FLIGHT&amp;quot;. Moon Miners Manifesto #95, May 1996]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, the same as with sulfur. This approach has been tested on a small scale, and was determined to be reasonably stable&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.wickmanspacecraft.com/moon1.html John Wickman. &amp;quot;Using Lunar Soil For Propellants &amp;amp; Concrete&amp;quot;. Wickman Spacecraft &amp;amp; Propulsion Company]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One potential issue with this approach is the production of dust. As the exhaust cools, particles of aluminum oxide would form, which could be an issue for heavy use. Proper design of the engine could mitigate this however. If the combustion was complete and all products were entirely vaporized upon ejection, the resulting dust should be quite small, perhaps microscopic in size, and traveling at sufficient speed to allow for wide dispersal. Current spacecraft are already designed to handle dust of this size, and its generation should not endanger their use.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== Silicon ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar [[silicon]] could possibly be used in the same manner as [[aluminum]], as they are similar in both atomic weight and potential energy, and hence could have similar specific impulses. Silicon has been utilized in test mixtures, powdered and mixed in a liquid oxygen gel as with aluminum&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://ae-www.technion.ac.il/~rocketw3/benny5.pdf Benveniste Natan and Shai Rahimi. &amp;quot;THE STATUS OF GEL PROPELLANTS IN YEAR 2000&amp;quot;. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering. Table 6]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. As silicon dioxide is the most common component of the lunar crust (nearly half by weight), it's use in this manner is attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==Liquid Metal Alloy Oxygen Rocket== &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Another possible solution to the high melting point of Aluminum is to alloy it with portions of calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, and silicon to get a low enough melting point for the alloy for convenient use while still using materials that are relatively abundant on Luna.  As a bi-propellant this alloy would need to be mixed with a large excess of oxygen for combustion to provide sufficient gas for a working fluid to expand as exhaust through a bell nozzle.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The proportions of the various metal components of the liquid fuel would be determined by the cost and availability of each component on the moon and its contribution to keeping a low melting point and providing high specific impulse.  NaK eutectic mixture is 22% sodium and 78% potassium.  It melts at 9.4 degrees Farenheit or -12.6 degrees Celsius.  So it is certainly not a difficult mixture to keep at a temperature at which it remains liquid to be handled by rocket engine turbo pumps.  Aluminum and magnesium would raise the melting temperature of the alloy but would be added for the high energy they provide when burned in oxygen and their relative local abundance.  Silicon would be added in such a proportion as would lower the melting point in a cost effective way.  The whole alloy would be maintained in the fuel tank at a temperature well above its melting point to be sure that some local variation did not cause plating out of a higher melting composition.  Multiple sheets of aluminum foil in lunar vacuum would provide adequate insulation so that the liquid metal fuel and the liquid oxygen would each stay at its proper temperature until pumped into the combustion chamber to be burned.  &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
==See Also== &lt;br /&gt;
*[[List of Propulsion Systems]] &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
== References ==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Boosters]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Industrial Production]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Space Transport]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21521</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21521"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:38:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Processing Regolith */  formatting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance and compared to the abundance of Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]--------(6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] ----------(3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]]-(1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]]--(1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]]---------(1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]--------(500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere    &lt;br /&gt;
* Earth orbit and interplanetary Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer, and reaction mass (esp Methane and Ammonia)&lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Helium-3 for the Earth market&lt;br /&gt;
* water for use on the Moon and in Earth orbit and interplanetary spacecraft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To supply the present global demand of Helium-3 would require processing 30 tons per hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volatiles are released by heating the regolith.   Different volatiles are released at different temperatures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 300 deg C --- some Helium and Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
* 500 deg C --- CO2 and CO&lt;br /&gt;
* 675 deg C --- more CO2&lt;br /&gt;
* 700 deg C --- more CO,  Nitrogen, all remaining H2 and He&lt;br /&gt;
* 900 to 1,000 deg C -- Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,100 to 1,200 deg C -- basalt melts&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,455 deg C -- Nickel melts&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,538 deg C -- Iron melts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A process to separate the voltile consitutents could be:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 1) heat to 400 deg C, collect the H and He&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate H from He)&lt;br /&gt;
* 2) heat to 600 deg C, collect CO and CO2 &lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate CO from CO2)&lt;br /&gt;
* 3) heat to 675 deg C to collect more CO2&lt;br /&gt;
* 4) heat to 700 degC to collect CO, H, He, N&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate the consituents)&lt;br /&gt;
* 5) Heat to 950 deg C and collect H2S and SO2&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate H2S from SO2)&lt;br /&gt;
* 6) heat to 1,200 degC , separate remaining iron particles, cast the basalt into useful components, then cool slowly to anneal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fractional distillaiton would best be performed during the luanr night when ambient temperature falls, reducing the energy needed to condense the various gases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though nuclear fusion is not yet realized, there is already a strong market for Helium3 on Earth which might be enough to support a start-up robotic mining operation.  Refer to the detailed analysis at this link:  [http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium#Chronic_shortage_of_Helium-3_isotope_could_be_resolved_by_mining_lunar_regolith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21520</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21520"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:36:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Processing Regolith */  effect of temperature on release of volatiles&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance and compared to the abundance of Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]--------(6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] ----------(3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]]-(1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]]--(1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]]---------(1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]--------(500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere    &lt;br /&gt;
* Earth orbit and interplanetary Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer, and reaction mass (esp Methane and Ammonia)&lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
* Helium-3 for the Earth market&lt;br /&gt;
* water for use on the Moon and in Earth orbit and interplanetary spacecraft&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To supply the present global demand of Helium-3 would require processing 30 tons per hour.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Volatiles are released by heating the regolith.   Different volatiles are released at different temperatures:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 300 deg C --- some Helium and Hydrogen&lt;br /&gt;
* 500 deg C --- CO2 and CO&lt;br /&gt;
* 675 deg C --- more CO2&lt;br /&gt;
* 700 deg C --- more CO,  Nitrogen, all remaining H2 and He&lt;br /&gt;
* 900 to 1,000 deg C -- Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfur Dioxide&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,100 to 1,200 deg C -- basalt melts&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,455 deg C -- Nickel melts&lt;br /&gt;
* 1,538 deg C -- Iron melts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
o a process to separate the voltile consitutents could be:&lt;br /&gt;
* 1) heat to 400 deg C, collect the H and He&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate H from He)&lt;br /&gt;
* 2) heat to 600 deg C, collect CO and CO2 &lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate CO from CO2)&lt;br /&gt;
* 3) heat to 675 deg C to collect more CO2&lt;br /&gt;
* 4) heat to 700 degC to collect CO, H, He, N&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate the consituents)&lt;br /&gt;
* 5) Heat to 950 deg C and collect H2S and SO2&lt;br /&gt;
(then fractionally distill to separate H2S from SO2)&lt;br /&gt;
* 6) heat to 1,200 degC , separate remaining iron particles, cast the basalt into useful componennts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fractional distillaiton would best be performed during the luanr night when ambient temperature falls, reducing the energy needed to condense the various gases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though nuclear fusion is not yet realized, there is already a strong market for Helium3 on Earth which might be enough to support a start-up robotic mining operation.  Refer to the detailed analysis at this link:  [http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium#Chronic_shortage_of_Helium-3_isotope_could_be_resolved_by_mining_lunar_regolith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21519</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21519"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:16:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41419.pdf The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress]  Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialists in Science and Technology PolicyDec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11472.pdf GAO-11-472] from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21518</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21518"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:15:03Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */  http://&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41419.pdf The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress]  Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialists in Science and Technology PolicyDec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11472.pdf GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21517</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21517"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:14:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41419.pdf The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress]  Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialists in Science and Technology PolicyDec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.gao.gov/new.items/d11472.pdf GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21516</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21516"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:12:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41419.pdf The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress]&lt;br /&gt;
Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialist s in Science and Technology Policy&lt;br /&gt;
Dec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.gao.gov/new.items/d11472.pdf GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21515</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21515"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:10:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */  hyperlinks added&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
References: &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41419.pdf] The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress&lt;br /&gt;
Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialist s in Science and Technology Policy&lt;br /&gt;
Dec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt; &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[www.gao.gov/new.items/d11472.pdf] GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21514</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21514"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:05:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance and compared to the abundance of Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]--------(6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] ----------(3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]]-(1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]]--(1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]]---------(1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]--------(500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though nuclear fusion is not yet realized, there is already a strong market for Helium3 on Earth which might be enough to support a start-up robotic mining operation.  Refer to the detailed analysis at this link:  [http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium#Chronic_shortage_of_Helium-3_isotope_could_be_resolved_by_mining_lunar_regolith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21513</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21513"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T19:04:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */  formatting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]--------(6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] ----------(3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]]-(1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]]--(1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]]---------(1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]--------(500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though nuclear fusion is not yet realized, there is already a strong market for Helium3 on Earth which might be enough to support a start-up robotic mining operation.  Refer to the detailed analysis at this link:  [http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium#Chronic_shortage_of_Helium-3_isotope_could_be_resolved_by_mining_lunar_regolith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21511</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21511"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:42:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]] (6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] (3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]] (1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]] (1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]] (1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]     (500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even though nuclear fusion is not yet realized, there is already a strong market for Helium3 on Earth which might be enough to support a start-up robotic mining operation.  Refer to the detailed analysis at this link:  [http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium#Chronic_shortage_of_Helium-3_isotope_could_be_resolved_by_mining_lunar_regolith]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21510</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21510"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:39:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress&lt;br /&gt;
Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialist s in Science and Technology Policy&lt;br /&gt;
Dec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21509</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=21509"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:38:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market */  further analysis&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;       |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]].  This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Helium 3 Fusion and a Lunar Settlement Window ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mining Helium 3 from the lunar regolith for generation of power on Earth is a very attractive economic foundation for a lunar settlement economy.  A number of powerful historic forces are pushing the human race in this direction, but the hurdles that must be overcome are daunting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Human civilization needs a source of electrical power to maintain itself.  Currently we are running on fossil fuels that are a limited resource and dump of huge amounts of greenhouse gases into Earth's atmosphere.  Even given the immense effort that it will take to develop fusion as a power source, fusion is currently one of our best possibilities for addressing the global warming problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current fission reactors will '''not''' meet 21st century needs.  They are limited by the possibility of nuclear proliferation, safe handling of the radioactive wastes, the amount of high grade ore available, and problems with the decommissioning of radioactive power plants at end-of-life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are several possible fusion fuels (Deuterium, Tritium, Helium 3, and Boron 11) that could be used.  Only one, Helium 3, comes from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Each fuel has different prospect for use.  The relative economic values can be judged by:  (1) ease of ignition, (2) possibility of power generation, and (3) safety of wastes produced.  Three of the top five possibilities are rated below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| border=1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Fuel''' || '''Lawson Criterion''' || '''Relative Power Density''' || '''Neutronicity'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Tritium''' || 1 || 1 || 0.80&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Deuterium-Helium 3''' || 16 || 80 || 0.05&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
| '''Proton-Boron 11''' || 500 || 2500 || 0.001&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Lawson Criterion is a index of how difficult the reaction is to initiate with respect to the  Deuterium-Tritium reaction.  The Relative Power Density gives an idea of how much power might be harnessed commercially.   The Neutronicity shows how much of the energy produced comes off in the form of fast neutrons which produce most of the radioactive wastes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This basic comparison suggests a possible economic window of opportunity for lunar Helium 3 mining.  The easiest fusion fuel, Deuterium-Tritium, comes from the seas of Earth, but the Tritium must be produced in conventional fission reactors and the fusion facility would slowly become radioactive and turn into a huge pile of radioactive waste after about 40 years of operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Helium 3 reaction is more difficult to initiate, but produces more energy with each reaction and produces negotiable radioactive wastes.  Its problem is that the bulk of Helium 3 will have to be mined on the Moon at great cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As fusion technology progresses, we will likely someday be able to fuse Boron 11.  This is far more difficult to do, but yields far more energy while generating truly negotiable radioactive wastes.  All this fuel's constituent parts are available at low cost on Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This suggests a window of opportunity for a lunar Helium 3 mining settlement.  The following historic events need to take place to open this window:  (1) it is determined that dumping carbon dioxide into Earth atmosphere must be stopped no matter what the cost, (2) wind and solar are not up to the job alone, (3) Deuterium-Tritium power production is accomplished, (4) Deuterium-Helium 3 power production is demonstrated, and (5) we build a lunar mining settlement.  There is nothing unreasonable in this list, although there is also nothing certain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This window would start to close when commercial Boron 11 fusion is demonstrated.  The established lunar settlement will then have to find other means of economic support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. The price of He3 given in PRAVDA is $4billion per ton.&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; [http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/17-03-2006/77404-moon-0/ '''''PRAVDA''''' Russia to launch industrial mining of helium-3 on the Moon in 2020] &amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;  That is $4000/gram, $124000/troy ounce or 90 times the price of gold.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $4000 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $400M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about one billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $400M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost more than $200M. How much He3 a small lander would manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined.  Production will be determined by the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $400M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded causing a price drop.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress&lt;br /&gt;
Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialist s in Science and Technology Policy&lt;br /&gt;
Dec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/refref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|A He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Volatiles]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Nuclear Fusion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Solar wind]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21508</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21508"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:35:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Helium 3, Special Considerations */  (analysis of present market)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]] (6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] (3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]] (1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]] (1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]] (1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]     (500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Chronic shortage of Helium-3 isotope could be resolved by mining lunar regolith====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Demand for Helium-3 is steadily increasing primarily for Neutron detectors.for cargo screening (for illegal fissile material).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2008, a total of 80,000 liters of He3 were sold worldwide, at an average price of $100, i.e. total market of $8 million -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then starting 2009 the DOE has introduced rationing,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 2010  DOE released 14,000 liters per year, at a spot market auction price of $2,000 per liter (US government customers received subsidized prices). This is a proven global market of around $28 million, perhaps more if we include non US DOE sources, e.g. in Russia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The market could expand to say $50 million or even $100 million per year if plentiful lunar He3 comes on line (price TBD).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a critical shortage of He3 today, due to two factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1) increasing demand for neutron detectors since 2001 for cargo screening at airport and seaports. There is also increasing demand at research facilities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2) reduced supply due to decommissioning of nuclear warheads in USA and Russia&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;The Helium-3 Shortage: Supply, Demand, and Options for Congress&lt;br /&gt;
Dana A. Shea + Daniel Morgan - Specialist s in Science and Technology Policy&lt;br /&gt;
Dec 22, 2010 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41419&amp;lt;/refref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;GAO-11-472 from May 2011,&lt;br /&gt;
title: MANAGING CRITICAL ISOTOPES Weaknesses in DOE’s Management of Helium-3 Delayed the Federal Response to a Critical Supply Shortage&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table-3 in the preceding ref shows Helium-3 price trends steadily increasing. The spot price has more than doubled in the last 3 years (2009 though 2011). The stockpiles of He-3 are shrinking rapidly, and there are only a few years of supply left in the current stockpiles, at which point the price could jump by orders of magnitude.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Alternative terrestrial sources are scarce and non-viable. For example, extracting He3 from natural gas could cost $12,000 per liter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The commercial amount of He3 needed would be 10,000 liters per year to 100,000 liters per year. He3 density is about 0.1g per liter at NTP, so we need about 1kg to 10 kg of the gas per year. At average concentration about 150,000 tons of regolith per year would need to be processed. About 500 tons per day, 22 tones per hour&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Markets consider upside pressures and downside pressures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Helium-3 is a very unusual commodity, in that presently it is completely synthetic, and the Helium-3 traded has not been occurring in nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have been feeding off of the nuclear warhead stockpile which has been the source of all the He3 in the world... that warhead stockpile is now mostly gone, so the rate at which we can replenish the He3 stockpile has dropped off a cliff&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We are now left with a known finite stockpile of He3 which is shrinking at a known rate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most commodities, we know exactly how big the He3 stockpile is, and we can track how it is being consumed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The stockpile is now down to about 50,000 liters, and the US DOE is presently releasing it at about 14,000 liters per year, and replenishing it with 8,000 liters per year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since natural demand has been demonstrated at 80,000 liters per year (2008), DOE is implementing a form of strict rationing, to try and eke out the He3 stockpile as long as possible.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a shortfall of 80,000 minus 14,000 liters = 66,000 liters of pent up demand, or to put it another way, the existing supply of He3 can only satisfy 17.5% of world demand.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no terrestrial solution to the He3 supply side, so for once the Moon has a real shot at being a solution to a real terrestrial economic problem.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At present the US Govt is investing heavily in Boron-10 technology as a second rate alternative to Helium-3 for neutron detectors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
According to Harrison Schnmitt in his 2006 book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, the Mark-II lunar miner of the Wisconsin Uni Fusion Institute, would cost about $1 billion. This Mark-II plant would produce 33 kg of He3 per year. This is several times more than needed to service the existing terrestrial He3 market .... presumably we could build a plant to produce 10 kg per year for $500 million?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21507</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21507"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:32:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */  added ref&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]] (6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] (3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]] (1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]] (1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]] (1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]     (500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/9301/node2.html#SECTION00020000000000000000] Concentrations of Various Volatiles in Apollo 11 Regolith&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21506</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21506"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:24:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */  sulfur content&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components (when regolith heated to 700 deg C) are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]] (6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] (3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]] (1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]] (1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]] (1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]     (500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When the regolith is heated to 900 deg C, a considerably quantity of sulfur compounds is released, including [[Hydrogen Sulfide]] and [[Sulfur Dioxide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/inventory.JPG] Inventory of Lunar Volatiles in first three meters of regolith (note log scale)&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21505</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21505"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:20:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */  added proporitions from Schmitt chart&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]] (6,100 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,100 by mass&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Water]] (3,300 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Dioxide]] (1,700 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon Monoxide]] (1,900 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Methane]] (1,600 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]     (500 times Helium-3 by mass)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Additional processing can also extract [[water]] and [[oxygen]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21504</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21504"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:13:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3] one part in 3,300]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]    &lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon]] compounds: [[Carbon Dioxide]], [[Carbon Monoxide]], and [[Methane]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Additional processing can also extract [[water]] and [[oxygen]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21503</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21503"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:12:39Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */  added link to Schmitt chart of volatilesi nventorty&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html Mystery Solved: NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space] Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That web page in turn has additional references which talk about the proportions of volatiles and their respective release temperatures.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]    &lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon]] compounds: [[Carbon Dioxide]], [[Carbon Monoxide]], and [[Methane]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Additional processing can also extract [[water]] and [[oxygen]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This chart is a very interesting depiction of the valitiles available when regolith is heated to  700 Deg c:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/LEC13/IMAGES/volatiles.JPG  Inventory of Lunar Volatiles relative to the production of one tonne of helium-3 ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21502</id>
		<title>Volatiles</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Volatiles&amp;diff=21502"/>
		<updated>2012-12-20T18:08:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Volatiles, The Key to Settlement */  ref to Schmitt lectures&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;[[Image:Sandworm01.jpg|thumb|400px|Sandworm proposal by [[User:Jriley|Tom Riley]], Side View]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Volatile Recovery on the Moon==&lt;br /&gt;
Long term lunar settlement, not to mention going on to Mars, will depend on successful extraction of volatile substances from the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Volatiles, The Key to Settlement===&lt;br /&gt;
The primary resource of value to humans on the Moon is the volatile components found in the [[regolith]]. These are all the components that are gases at room temperature. Most of the volatiles have been deposited in the top layers of the Moon's surface by the [[solar wind]] over geologic time. A notable exception to this is [[Argon]]. the concentration of Argon in lunar soil is much higher than found in the solar wind, so must come from a different source. Especially, the isotope Argon-40. It is presently believed that the Argon-40 comes from radioactive decay of [[Potassium]] deep within the lunar mantle or core, and that the Argon-40 seeps out to the surface via fissures. This vented Argon enters the lunar atmosphere; then the Argon is implanted into the regolith by interactions with ions from the solar wind.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The volatiles contain material useful for rocket fuel, reaction mass, for making air to breath, and for industrial operations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The various constituents of the volatiles vary from place to place on the Moon. Access to a mining area with high abundances will be a major concern for any settlement site.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dr. Harrison Schmitt in his lectures at University of Wisonsin provides some links on their page page with data on abundance of luanr volatile components:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ref:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
NEEP602 Course Notes (Fall 1996) Resources from Space&lt;br /&gt;
Lecture #13: It's only a gassy Moon!&lt;br /&gt;
Title: Resources of the Moon: Solar Wind/Cosmic Ray Derived&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep602/lecture13.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major components are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(in order of abundance)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hydrogen]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Helium4]] with a trace amount of [[Helium3]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Argon]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Nitrogen]]    &lt;br /&gt;
* Other Inert gases, [[Neon]] and [[Radon]]    &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Carbon]] compounds: [[Carbon Dioxide]], [[Carbon Monoxide]], and [[Methane]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Additional processing can also extract [[water]] and [[oxygen]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Apollo Regolith Testing===&lt;br /&gt;
Regolith samples from Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 were returned to Earth and analyzed for the volatiles they emitted when heated in a vacuum.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo11Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 11 gas release from soil sample 10086,16]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Apollo12Soil.jpg|right|thumb|400px|Apollo 12 gas release from soil sample 12023,9]]&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The regolith samples were exposed to Earth air and may have picked up some volatiles in transport. Lunar regolith is regularly subject to heating from the sun to at least 150 C. Any volatiles coming out below that temperature was taken to be from Earth.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 150 C and 700 C substantial amounts of hydrogen, water, carbon dioxide, and helium came off the samples. In this temperature range the molecules must have been adsorbed on the surface of crystal grains and not bound in chemical compounds. These temperatures are probably achievable by the use of concentrated solar energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Between the temperatures of 700 C and 1400 C additional volatile materials come off including substantial amount so nitrogen, carbon monoxide, [[hydrogen sulfide]], and finally oxygen. These volatiles probably represent the breakdown of more complex compounds. These temperatures are routinely achieved in industrial processes on Earth. The volatile output can probably be increased by providing a reducing atmosphere, such as hot hydrogen, and by the presence of a catalyst, such as [[platinum]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1971LPSC....2.1351G]] Gibson, E. K., Jr.; Johnson, S. M., Thermal Analysis-Inorganic Gas Release of Lunar Samples&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Processing Regolith===&lt;br /&gt;
A major enterprise of any lunar settlement will be the processing of lunar regolith for volatile scavenging. Once the volatile gas mix has been extracted from the regolith, then fractional distillation can be used to separate out the different chemical constituents which have different boiling points.  In one proposal, called the [[Sandworms|Sandworm]], a very large vehicle would crawl across the landscape milling out a trench three meters deep and up to 23 meters wide. Some of these trenches could then be used as sites for buildings.  Other proposals include smaller vehicle processing or the use of collection vehicles or other means for bringing regolith to a stationary processing facility.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The primary uses of the volatiles are:&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Lunar use for breathable atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Spaceship atmosphere&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Rocket fuel and oxidizer&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
* Industrial stocks&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
It is necessary to process only a few tens of kilograms of regolith a shift to replace atmosphere loses in an early small station. A much higher rate of processing will be needed to produce air to grow the settlement and to produce fuel and oxidizer for return flights to the Earth or for trips on to Mars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3, Special Considerations===&lt;br /&gt;
[[Helium 3]] is a special case. As detailed in [[Harrison Schmitt]]'s book &amp;quot;Return to the Moon&amp;quot;, it is the only lunar resource worth shipping back to the surface of the Earth at this time. In the long term, it could be used in fusion power plants on Earth as a source of clean, non-carbon energy. This type of power plant is currently under development, but is not yet near commercial operation.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Helium 3 is very rare on Earth and only a minor component of the lunar regolith volatiles. To refine enough to feed a power plant for a medium size city would require processing regolith at the rate of about 50 tons an hour. The scale of processing needed is directly reflected in the large scale of the proposed [[Sandworms|Sandworm]]. A commercial operation of this size on Earth would not be considered a very large facility, but we are talking about the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
===Cooking out the O2===&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest source of oxygen on the Moon is a [[Titanium]]-[[Iron]]-[[Oxygen]] mineral called [[ilmenite]] (FeTiO3) which can be processed via a [[ilmenite reduction|reduction reaction]]. It is a straight forward process to [[magnetically]] [[beneficiate]] this mineral while handling the [[regolith]] [[fines]].&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
The magnetically beneficiated material is valuable as an ore concentrate and can be robotically handled. It is placed in a [[pressure vessel]] with an atmosphere of [[hydrogen]], which is the largest component of the volatile extraction. The vessel is then solar heated to about 1200 C for 20 minutes. The result is that the ore is reduced to iron, [[titanium dioxide]], and [[water]]. The water comes off as a vapor and can be electrically split into hydrogen and oxygen. This process appears to be the least energetic approach for obtaining substantial amounts of water and oxygen on the Moon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=====Byproducts=====    &lt;br /&gt;
======Solid Byproducts======    &lt;br /&gt;
The solids left from this process will remain a good titanium and iron ore. This material may become a valuable asset for later settlers and can be used to make [[ceramic]] tiles for flooring or as feedstock for other chemical processes.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
======Gaseous Byproducts======&lt;br /&gt;
After the hydrogen has been consumed, the remaining volatiles will be mostly Helium and Argon. The Argon can be removed by fractionally distilling the gas mixture. The Argon can be used as propellant for electric propulsion thrusters (ion drives). The Helium can be separated into the two main isotopes by methods described elsewhere. The isotope [[Helium 3]] is potentially useful as fuel for nuclear fusion reactors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ice at the Poles===    &lt;br /&gt;
Two missions so far ([[Clementine]] and [[Lunar Prospector]]) have produced evidence for hydrogen in the polar regions of the Moon. The present theory is that it is in the form of water ice particles mixed with the [[regolith]] in permanently shadowed [[craters]]. The amount and properties of this resource are not currently known, but we soon will have definitive data from the [[Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter]] mission ([[LRO]]) by 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if substantial amounts of water are present in the polar traps, it may be very difficult to mine. The very nature of the traps is that they have no access to [[solar power]] at all and they are at the bottoms of deep craters. For a settlement to take advantage of this resource it will need to be on near by high ground and work the area robotically.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
This will be very difficult work at the [[cryogenic]] temperatures in the traps. It is not clear whither simply working the sunlit uplands, with plenty of solar power but only a trace of [[volatiles]], is not the better idea. We will know soon.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Outgassing of Volatiles===&lt;br /&gt;
There are some sites on the Moon where natural release of volatiles via [[Lunar outgassing|outgassing]] of volatiles has been observed. In particular, the crater [[Aristarchus]] is well known. Outgassing sites would be attractive locations for settlements&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070730_gassy_moon.html Lunar Flash Mystery Solved: Moon Just Passing Gas] By David Powell posted: 30 July 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mining]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Chemistry]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ISRU]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Stories]]    &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Solar_Power_Satellites&amp;diff=15243</id>
		<title>Solar Power Satellites</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Solar_Power_Satellites&amp;diff=15243"/>
		<updated>2009-07-18T04:00:45Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: Reverted edits by Cfrjlr (Talk); changed back to last version by Bhn1700&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The concept of Solar Power Satellites (SPS) was invented and first described, in November 1968 by Dr.[[Peter Glaser]] of [[Arthur D. Little Corporation]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ref: Glaser, Peter E. &amp;quot;Power from the Sun: Its Future&amp;quot;. Science Magazine, 22 November 1968 Vol 162, Issue 3856, Pages 857-861. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concept of SPS are solar arrays in geosynchronous orbit around Earth, beaming power to the ground via microwaves.  The receiving antenna ([[rectenna]]) is quite large, several square miles.   The conversion efficiency of a rectenna is about 95%, compared to 20% or less for photovotaic cells.   So SPS rectennas would require a lot less land area than conventional solar cells.   According to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Power#Energy_from_the_Sun wikipedia] a solar panel in the contiguous United States on average delivers 19 to 56 W/mÂ². By comparison an SPS rectenna would deliver continuously about 1,000 W/mÂ², hence the size of the rectenna required per watt would be about 1.9% to 5.6% that of a terrestrial solar panel.  Some have proposed beaming down power via lasers instead of microwaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Using Lunar Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The late Dr.[[Gerard K. O'Neill]] determined that SPS could most cheaply be built from lunar materials.    On 30 April 1979 the Final Report [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19830077470_1983077470.pdf &amp;quot;LUNAR RESOURCES UTILIZATION FOR SPACE CONSTRUCTION&amp;quot;] by General Dynamics Convair Division under NASA contract NAS9-15560 concluded that use of lunar resources would be cheaper than terrestrial materials for a system comprising as few as thirty Solar Power Satellites of 10GW capacity each. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Radio Frequency Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The inverse square law does not apply to a focused beam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation of beam spreading is a function of the transmitting antenna aperture versus the frequency.  The bigger the aperture, the tighter the beam.  Beam spreading does not cause significant power loss.  The size of the antenna is set to precisely match the dimensions of the beam as it intersects the Earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A little bit of energy is lost due to sidelobes which are caused by diffraction.  It is typically not worth it to make the receiving antenna large enough to catch all the sidelobes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for problems of radio interference: that has little to do with the size of the rectenna, but is certainly an issue which needs to be addressed in the system design.   The problem of radio interference is solvable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SPSes normally would be about 2.4 GHz. This would not affect Ku band at all. There would have to be some review of the effect of harmonics. But since the SPS sends a narrow beam, the Ku band downlink receiving station would have to be within a few kilometres of the rectenna to even notice the harmonics within the sidelobes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interference between comm-sats of the same frequencies is a much bigger problem than interference between them and the SPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest problem is that the best frequencies for SPS have now been allocated to cell phone services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Maintenance==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for maintenance:  very little maintenance is required for a rectenna system, it is essentially passive with no moving parts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Next steps==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar L-1 is the best place to put an initial solar power satellite demonstrator. We can place the rectenna on the Moon and the solar PV arrays at L-1. The distance from L-1 to the Moon (50,000 km) is similar to the distance from GEO to Earth (40,000 km), so it will validate the engineering design well, and prove that useful power can be beamed over that distance.&lt;br /&gt;
This is also the cheapest way to deliver large scale power to the lunar surface, as rectennas are light weight and PV cells area heavy.  Soft landing hardware on the Moon from Earth is very expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solar power Satellites (SPS) will not compete head to head on price alone in the foreseeable future.  This is because deceptively cheap (subsidized) energy continues to be readily available using nuclear power and fossil fuels, and could continue for a couple of centuries or more.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we assume, hypothetically, that the world decides that &amp;quot;Fossil Fuels Are Bad&amp;quot;, and mandates zero emission of greenhouse gases then what forms of power will be used?  Does this mean a widespread increase in the use of nuclear power?  Is this a good thing or a bad thing? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is SPS better than nuclear power? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collateral damage caused by fossil fuels and nuclear fission far outweighs their deceptively low price.  The real price for these fuels is very high when you consider these factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternatives to Solar power Satellites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fossil fuel (coal, oil, gas):===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- military cost of securing sources of supply and supply channels, with associated geopolitical problems and trouble with the local insurgents - [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070203/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_budget;_ylt=AtygXJsZAwL.OXFnqMT2A1Zp24cA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA-- Bush budget hikes war funding] &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of the war on terror (unfriendly regimes and terrorists funded by oil revenues) &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- huge trade deficits from importing fossil fuels [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6190545.stm US deficit heading towards record ] &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- air pollution - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- global warming exacerbated by greenhouse gases &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- water pollution (e.g. Mercury from coal) - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Global Warming====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 2nd February 2007, [http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/index.html Working Group I] of the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] (IPCC) published  IPCC Working Group I Fourth Assessment Report Summary for Policymakers (SPM) [http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/WG1AR4_SPM_PlenaryApproved.pdf http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/WG1AR4_SPM_PlenaryApproved.pdf].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later in 2007 the IPCC will publish the complete version of the most strongly worded report so far &amp;quot;Fourth Assessment Report (AR4)&amp;quot;, confirming that human emissions of greenhouse gases is causing the temperature of the Earth to rise, which is resulting in increasing changes to the planet's climate.  The consequences of this include disruption to agriculture and global food supply, extinction of species, rising sea levels, loss of human habitat, increased erosion, increased disease from insect habitat expansion, slowing or shutting down the thermohaline circulation which keeps western Europe warm, and property damage due to more violent storms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SPS is a potential solution to global warming.  SPS will reduce heat pollution, not increase it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assuming the world is supplied by 200 SPS at 5 GW each.   Each SPS loses 1 % into the atmosphere, a total of 10 GW of atmospheric heating caused by all the world's SPSes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 / 1.2 x 10E14 = 8 x 10e8 GW &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the entire losses of all the world's SPSes would be 8 parts in a hundred million. The present power stations of the world are injecting about thirty times as much into the atmosphere right now even as we type for a total of 2000 GW. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And even that is a drop in the bucket compared to global warming.  According to the NASA GSFC website (in 2002), the imbalance due to greenhouses gases is 2.45 W/m2, which the Earth is absorbing and not radiating to space.  Of the greenhouse gases, 1.56 W/m2 is due to CO2, 0.47 to methane and 0.14 to N2O. This equates to an energy absorption rate of 12 million GW. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SPS will reduce the problem of global warming, because it will replace the 12 million GW due to greenhouse gases, and the 2000 GW due to nuclear and fossil fuels, and replace it with a more tolerable 10 GW (worst case) of direct atmospheric absorption and 100 GW of waste heat at ground level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mercury contamination from burning coal====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is now official, seafood is becoming unsafe because of Mercury&lt;br /&gt;
contamination from burning coal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.epa.gov/mercury/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2004/NEW01038.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.epa.gov/ost/fishadvice/advice.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oil and Natural gas will be running out in a few decades and the&lt;br /&gt;
world will then rely essentially on coal for its primary source of&lt;br /&gt;
energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seafood contamination will get worse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nuclear fission===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- military cost of securing supply chains against theft &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- military cost of securing waste sites against theft &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cleanup cost of decommissioning power stations &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of meltdown - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of waste leakage - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of insuring and banking prohibitively high and primarially possible through government subsidy &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- social cost of draconian global security regimes (big brother)&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Terrestrial Solar power===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sun angle across PV arrays constantly changes, and is usually less than the 1,360 w/m^2 maximum. To maintain constant max power the PV array must have expensive and heavy steering equipment.  Whereas a SPS rectenna does not need to be steered, and always gets maximum power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of 24 hour coverage (ignoring weather) means that terrestrial solar power systems need some means of supplying consumers during the night time.  Night time load is usually less than daytime load, but it is not zero, far from it.  In winter time especially, the working day extends substantially into dark time.  Many industries and transportation systems need to operate on a 24/7 basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means that one of two systems are needed, either &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) a global power grid to pass power from the daylit side to the night side, or &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) power storage systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both solutions exceed the cost of the solar cells themselves and are conveniently ignored by most proponents of terrestrial solar power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solution a) also suffers from political problems, similar to the international wrangling going on about the Tengiz oil field pipeline.  Long range transmission of power across the planet will also cause significant losses of power over transmission lines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pipelines and power lines are political hot potatoes, nobody wants a hostile neighbor to have the ability to cut off their power or their oil. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another issue: Ironically, terrestrial solar power has a more severe impact on terrestrial ecosystems and land usage than SPS rectennas.   Permanent shadowing of the soil from a solar panel kills the local flora and results in a dustbowl.   But agriculture can continue unabated beneath an SPS rectenna and soil erosion is thus mitigated.  SPS rectennas can be sited on prime agricultural land, terrestrial solar panels cannot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethanol/Biodiesel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After oil is gone, ethanol will compete with hydrogen as fuel for motor vehicles and aircraft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it will not compete (on price) with coal or nuclear for grid electrical power. But neither will SPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefit of SPS is that it has about the lowest collateral damage cost, when compared with the environmental damage of coal and nuclear, including the cost of nuclear station decommissioning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though ethanol has a lower collateral cost than coal there are other concerns with ethanol.  Does the world have enough agricultural capacity (or waste straw) to create the necessary quantities of ethanol?  If not, what about the quantities of fertilizers required and their environmental impact (production and runoff)?  And what about the waste products of ethanol production?  New studies have also indicated that ethanol and biofuels lead to a worsening of global warming.  The increasing commodities prices of corn and soybean have lead to increased virgin acreage being converted to corn, soybean and other food crops.  (As other foods have gone up in price due to more acreage going to fuel crops and because feed grain prices have also risen for livestock.)  Virgin land, whether forest or grasslands are far better for soaking up CO2 then farmland.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2008-02-08-ethanol-study_N.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, ethanol and SPS can coexist rather nicely. We can grow fields of cereal crops beneath the SPS rectennas, at least where the soil and climate allow it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Renewables (wind, tidal, hydro, geothermal)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Renewables (e.g. wind, tidal, hydro, geothermal) only have the capacity to supply a tiny fraction of the global demand for energy.   The limitation is geography, there simply are very few sites in the world where generating systems of these types can be built.  Though theoretically wind does have some potential above ground level.  By harnessing the wind at around 3,000 feet, essentially tethering a large wing to the ground, the geographic reach of wind grows dramatically, covering most of the United States.  Ocean based windpower is one possibility, but that is dominated by the high cost of long distance power transmission, in which case SPS would be highly competitive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nuclear Fusion===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past few decades humanity has been &amp;quot;ten years &amp;quot; away from achieving [[nuclear fusion]] breakthrough.  At this time there is no credible timeline for when nuclear fusion power plants will come on line.  So until then, nuclear fusion is not a credible competitor to solar power satellites.  Nevertheless, many countries are pouring billions of dollars and euros annually into nuclear fusion research, but SPS R&amp;amp;D is receiving no funding at all, except via tiny discretionary accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include the cost of maintaining a military presence in the middle east, and the cost of global warming, then the cost of oil would probably quadruple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear power might appear cheaper than SPS at first sight, until you factor in the cost of disposing of nuclear waste, decommissioning the reactors and the insurance and banking rates for nuclear plants, then it suddenly becomes horrendously expensive and SPS becomes attractive.  But so far, nuclear decommissioning costs have been ignored, so that is a problem that future generations will have to figure out how to pay for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If society ever reaches the conclusion that fossil fuels and nuclear fuels are undesirable for the above reasons, then there is the remaining alternative of SPS for clean inexhaustible power on a global scale.  When compared to space projects to date, SPS is very grand and ambitious, and much bigger than anything ever attempted in space before.  But when compared to the activities of the energy industry, it is in the same ball park.  If we start thinking of SPS as an ENERGY project, instead of a SPACE project, then it starts to become a lot more feasible.  SPS is really no more expensive than the energy projects which are&lt;br /&gt;
under way today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Energy is big business, it involves big money. Much bigger than the&lt;br /&gt;
space program.  NASA's budget is a tiny insect when compared to the oil&lt;br /&gt;
empires of today.  And SPS has so many advantages over oil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as long as society is willing to continue subsidizing fossil fuels and nuclear systems, then SPS is not an option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U.S. Budgetary Footnote===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice how tiny the US Dept of Energy research budget is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Out of a total 2003 budget of about $23 billion, less than half was for&lt;br /&gt;
energy research. This is less than the NASA budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet in the same year, the US spent over $100 billion on military&lt;br /&gt;
activities to defend sources of oil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Current Developments==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 2007 the US Department of Defense expressed interest in studying the concept&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265380,00.html Pentagon Considering Study on Space-Based Solar Power] Thursday, April 12, 2007, By Jeremy Singer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 10/10/2007 The [[National Security Space Office]] of the US [[Department of Defense]], published an assessment report&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spacesolarpower.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/final-sbsp-interim-assessment-release-01.pdf SpaceBased Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Security - Phase 0 Architecture Feasibility Study] - Report to the Director, National Security Space Office - Interim Assessment, Release 0.1, 10 October 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The report was released at a press conference which simultaneously announced the formation of the [[Space Solar Alliance for Future Energy]] which intends to pursue the recommendations of the NSSO-Led Study.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Solar Power]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NASA TM-2004-212743]] - &amp;quot;Reinventing the Solar Power Satellite&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Peak Power Markets for Satellite Solar Power&amp;quot; from the Houston IAF Congress ([[International Astronautical Federation]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: [[Geoffrey A. Landis]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basic Principles of Beamed Microwave Power [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/22/3793/00141357.pdf?arnumber=141357  &lt;br /&gt;
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/22/3793/00141357.pdf?arnumber=141357  ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Center for Space Power]] Â· A NASA Resarch Partnership Center [http://engineer.tamu.edu/tees/csp/ http://engineer.tamu.edu/tees/csp/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hardware]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hardware Plans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Power Supply]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Solar_Power_Satellites&amp;diff=15242</id>
		<title>Solar Power Satellites</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Solar_Power_Satellites&amp;diff=15242"/>
		<updated>2009-07-18T03:59:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* See Also */  jeez i do not understand this new editor .. somebody will ahve to clean this up&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The concept of Solar Power Satellites (SPS) was invented and first described, in November 1968 by Dr.[[Peter Glaser]] of [[Arthur D. Little Corporation]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ref: Glaser, Peter E. &amp;quot;Power from the Sun: Its Future&amp;quot;. Science Magazine, 22 November 1968 Vol 162, Issue 3856, Pages 857-861. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The concept of SPS are solar arrays in geosynchronous orbit around Earth, beaming power to the ground via microwaves.  The receiving antenna ([[rectenna]]) is quite large, several square miles.   The conversion efficiency of a rectenna is about 95%, compared to 20% or less for photovotaic cells.   So SPS rectennas would require a lot less land area than conventional solar cells.   According to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_Power#Energy_from_the_Sun wikipedia] a solar panel in the contiguous United States on average delivers 19 to 56 W/mÂ². By comparison an SPS rectenna would deliver continuously about 1,000 W/mÂ², hence the size of the rectenna required per watt would be about 1.9% to 5.6% that of a terrestrial solar panel.  Some have proposed beaming down power via lasers instead of microwaves.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Using Lunar Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The late Dr.[[Gerard K. O'Neill]] determined that SPS could most cheaply be built from lunar materials.    On 30 April 1979 the Final Report [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19830077470_1983077470.pdf &amp;quot;LUNAR RESOURCES UTILIZATION FOR SPACE CONSTRUCTION&amp;quot;] by General Dynamics Convair Division under NASA contract NAS9-15560 concluded that use of lunar resources would be cheaper than terrestrial materials for a system comprising as few as thirty Solar Power Satellites of 10GW capacity each. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Radio Frequency Issues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The inverse square law does not apply to a focused beam.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The equation of beam spreading is a function of the transmitting antenna aperture versus the frequency.  The bigger the aperture, the tighter the beam.  Beam spreading does not cause significant power loss.  The size of the antenna is set to precisely match the dimensions of the beam as it intersects the Earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A little bit of energy is lost due to sidelobes which are caused by diffraction.  It is typically not worth it to make the receiving antenna large enough to catch all the sidelobes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for problems of radio interference: that has little to do with the size of the rectenna, but is certainly an issue which needs to be addressed in the system design.   The problem of radio interference is solvable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SPSes normally would be about 2.4 GHz. This would not affect Ku band at all. There would have to be some review of the effect of harmonics. But since the SPS sends a narrow beam, the Ku band downlink receiving station would have to be within a few kilometres of the rectenna to even notice the harmonics within the sidelobes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Interference between comm-sats of the same frequencies is a much bigger problem than interference between them and the SPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The biggest problem is that the best frequencies for SPS have now been allocated to cell phone services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Maintenance==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for maintenance:  very little maintenance is required for a rectenna system, it is essentially passive with no moving parts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Next steps==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar L-1 is the best place to put an initial solar power satellite demonstrator. We can place the rectenna on the Moon and the solar PV arrays at L-1. The distance from L-1 to the Moon (50,000 km) is similar to the distance from GEO to Earth (40,000 km), so it will validate the engineering design well, and prove that useful power can be beamed over that distance.&lt;br /&gt;
This is also the cheapest way to deliver large scale power to the lunar surface, as rectennas are light weight and PV cells area heavy.  Soft landing hardware on the Moon from Earth is very expensive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Economics==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solar power Satellites (SPS) will not compete head to head on price alone in the foreseeable future.  This is because deceptively cheap (subsidized) energy continues to be readily available using nuclear power and fossil fuels, and could continue for a couple of centuries or more.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If we assume, hypothetically, that the world decides that &amp;quot;Fossil Fuels Are Bad&amp;quot;, and mandates zero emission of greenhouse gases then what forms of power will be used?  Does this mean a widespread increase in the use of nuclear power?  Is this a good thing or a bad thing? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is SPS better than nuclear power? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The collateral damage caused by fossil fuels and nuclear fission far outweighs their deceptively low price.  The real price for these fuels is very high when you consider these factors:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Alternatives to Solar power Satellites==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fossil fuel (coal, oil, gas):===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- military cost of securing sources of supply and supply channels, with associated geopolitical problems and trouble with the local insurgents - [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070203/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_budget;_ylt=AtygXJsZAwL.OXFnqMT2A1Zp24cA;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA-- Bush budget hikes war funding] &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of the war on terror (unfriendly regimes and terrorists funded by oil revenues) &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- huge trade deficits from importing fossil fuels [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6190545.stm US deficit heading towards record ] &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- air pollution - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- global warming exacerbated by greenhouse gases &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- water pollution (e.g. Mercury from coal) - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Global Warming====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 2nd February 2007, [http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/index.html Working Group I] of the [[Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]] (IPCC) published  IPCC Working Group I Fourth Assessment Report Summary for Policymakers (SPM) [http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/WG1AR4_SPM_PlenaryApproved.pdf http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/docs/WG1AR4_SPM_PlenaryApproved.pdf].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Later in 2007 the IPCC will publish the complete version of the most strongly worded report so far &amp;quot;Fourth Assessment Report (AR4)&amp;quot;, confirming that human emissions of greenhouse gases is causing the temperature of the Earth to rise, which is resulting in increasing changes to the planet's climate.  The consequences of this include disruption to agriculture and global food supply, extinction of species, rising sea levels, loss of human habitat, increased erosion, increased disease from insect habitat expansion, slowing or shutting down the thermohaline circulation which keeps western Europe warm, and property damage due to more violent storms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SPS is a potential solution to global warming.  SPS will reduce heat pollution, not increase it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Assuming the world is supplied by 200 SPS at 5 GW each.   Each SPS loses 1 % into the atmosphere, a total of 10 GW of atmospheric heating caused by all the world's SPSes. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10 / 1.2 x 10E14 = 8 x 10e8 GW &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So the entire losses of all the world's SPSes would be 8 parts in a hundred million. The present power stations of the world are injecting about thirty times as much into the atmosphere right now even as we type for a total of 2000 GW. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And even that is a drop in the bucket compared to global warming.  According to the NASA GSFC website (in 2002), the imbalance due to greenhouses gases is 2.45 W/m2, which the Earth is absorbing and not radiating to space.  Of the greenhouse gases, 1.56 W/m2 is due to CO2, 0.47 to methane and 0.14 to N2O. This equates to an energy absorption rate of 12 million GW. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SPS will reduce the problem of global warming, because it will replace the 12 million GW due to greenhouse gases, and the 2000 GW due to nuclear and fossil fuels, and replace it with a more tolerable 10 GW (worst case) of direct atmospheric absorption and 100 GW of waste heat at ground level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Mercury contamination from burning coal====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is now official, seafood is becoming unsafe because of Mercury&lt;br /&gt;
contamination from burning coal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.epa.gov/mercury/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/news/2004/NEW01038.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.epa.gov/ost/fishadvice/advice.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oil and Natural gas will be running out in a few decades and the&lt;br /&gt;
world will then rely essentially on coal for its primary source of&lt;br /&gt;
energy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Seafood contamination will get worse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nuclear fission===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- military cost of securing supply chains against theft &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- military cost of securing waste sites against theft &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cleanup cost of decommissioning power stations &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of meltdown - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of waste leakage - reduced life expectancy / healthcare costs &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- cost of insuring and banking prohibitively high and primarially possible through government subsidy &amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
- social cost of draconian global security regimes (big brother)&amp;lt;BR&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Terrestrial Solar power===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sun angle across PV arrays constantly changes, and is usually less than the 1,360 w/m^2 maximum. To maintain constant max power the PV array must have expensive and heavy steering equipment.  Whereas a SPS rectenna does not need to be steered, and always gets maximum power.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lack of 24 hour coverage (ignoring weather) means that terrestrial solar power systems need some means of supplying consumers during the night time.  Night time load is usually less than daytime load, but it is not zero, far from it.  In winter time especially, the working day extends substantially into dark time.  Many industries and transportation systems need to operate on a 24/7 basis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This means that one of two systems are needed, either &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a) a global power grid to pass power from the daylit side to the night side, or &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b) power storage systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Both solutions exceed the cost of the solar cells themselves and are conveniently ignored by most proponents of terrestrial solar power. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solution a) also suffers from political problems, similar to the international wrangling going on about the Tengiz oil field pipeline.  Long range transmission of power across the planet will also cause significant losses of power over transmission lines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pipelines and power lines are political hot potatoes, nobody wants a hostile neighbor to have the ability to cut off their power or their oil. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another issue: Ironically, terrestrial solar power has a more severe impact on terrestrial ecosystems and land usage than SPS rectennas.   Permanent shadowing of the soil from a solar panel kills the local flora and results in a dustbowl.   But agriculture can continue unabated beneath an SPS rectenna and soil erosion is thus mitigated.  SPS rectennas can be sited on prime agricultural land, terrestrial solar panels cannot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Ethanol/Biodiesel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After oil is gone, ethanol will compete with hydrogen as fuel for motor vehicles and aircraft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
However, it will not compete (on price) with coal or nuclear for grid electrical power. But neither will SPS.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The benefit of SPS is that it has about the lowest collateral damage cost, when compared with the environmental damage of coal and nuclear, including the cost of nuclear station decommissioning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Though ethanol has a lower collateral cost than coal there are other concerns with ethanol.  Does the world have enough agricultural capacity (or waste straw) to create the necessary quantities of ethanol?  If not, what about the quantities of fertilizers required and their environmental impact (production and runoff)?  And what about the waste products of ethanol production?  New studies have also indicated that ethanol and biofuels lead to a worsening of global warming.  The increasing commodities prices of corn and soybean have lead to increased virgin acreage being converted to corn, soybean and other food crops.  (As other foods have gone up in price due to more acreage going to fuel crops and because feed grain prices have also risen for livestock.)  Virgin land, whether forest or grasslands are far better for soaking up CO2 then farmland.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2008-02-08-ethanol-study_N.htm&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Interestingly, ethanol and SPS can coexist rather nicely. We can grow fields of cereal crops beneath the SPS rectennas, at least where the soil and climate allow it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other Renewables (wind, tidal, hydro, geothermal)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other Renewables (e.g. wind, tidal, hydro, geothermal) only have the capacity to supply a tiny fraction of the global demand for energy.   The limitation is geography, there simply are very few sites in the world where generating systems of these types can be built.  Though theoretically wind does have some potential above ground level.  By harnessing the wind at around 3,000 feet, essentially tethering a large wing to the ground, the geographic reach of wind grows dramatically, covering most of the United States.  Ocean based windpower is one possibility, but that is dominated by the high cost of long distance power transmission, in which case SPS would be highly competitive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nuclear Fusion===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the past few decades humanity has been &amp;quot;ten years &amp;quot; away from achieving [[nuclear fusion]] breakthrough.  At this time there is no credible timeline for when nuclear fusion power plants will come on line.  So until then, nuclear fusion is not a credible competitor to solar power satellites.  Nevertheless, many countries are pouring billions of dollars and euros annually into nuclear fusion research, but SPS R&amp;amp;D is receiving no funding at all, except via tiny discretionary accounts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Conclusion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you include the cost of maintaining a military presence in the middle east, and the cost of global warming, then the cost of oil would probably quadruple.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nuclear power might appear cheaper than SPS at first sight, until you factor in the cost of disposing of nuclear waste, decommissioning the reactors and the insurance and banking rates for nuclear plants, then it suddenly becomes horrendously expensive and SPS becomes attractive.  But so far, nuclear decommissioning costs have been ignored, so that is a problem that future generations will have to figure out how to pay for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If society ever reaches the conclusion that fossil fuels and nuclear fuels are undesirable for the above reasons, then there is the remaining alternative of SPS for clean inexhaustible power on a global scale.  When compared to space projects to date, SPS is very grand and ambitious, and much bigger than anything ever attempted in space before.  But when compared to the activities of the energy industry, it is in the same ball park.  If we start thinking of SPS as an ENERGY project, instead of a SPACE project, then it starts to become a lot more feasible.  SPS is really no more expensive than the energy projects which are&lt;br /&gt;
under way today.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Energy is big business, it involves big money. Much bigger than the&lt;br /&gt;
space program.  NASA's budget is a tiny insect when compared to the oil&lt;br /&gt;
empires of today.  And SPS has so many advantages over oil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But as long as society is willing to continue subsidizing fossil fuels and nuclear systems, then SPS is not an option.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===U.S. Budgetary Footnote===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Notice how tiny the US Dept of Energy research budget is.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Out of a total 2003 budget of about $23 billion, less than half was for&lt;br /&gt;
energy research. This is less than the NASA budget.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yet in the same year, the US spent over $100 billion on military&lt;br /&gt;
activities to defend sources of oil.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Current Developments==&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
In 2007 the US Department of Defense expressed interest in studying the concept&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,265380,00.html Pentagon Considering Study on Space-Based Solar Power] Thursday, April 12, 2007, By Jeremy Singer&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 10/10/2007 The [[National Security Space Office]] of the US [[Department of Defense]], published an assessment report&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://spacesolarpower.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/final-sbsp-interim-assessment-release-01.pdf SpaceBased Solar Power As an Opportunity for Strategic Security - Phase 0 Architecture Feasibility Study] - Report to the Director, National Security Space Office - Interim Assessment, Release 0.1, 10 October 2007&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;.  The report was released at a press conference which simultaneously announced the formation of the [[Space Solar Alliance for Future Energy]] which intends to pursue the recommendations of the NSSO-Led Study.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See Also==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Solar Power]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[NASA TM-2004-212743]] - &amp;quot;Reinventing the Solar Power Satellite&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Peak Power Markets for Satellite Solar Power&amp;quot; from the Houston IAF Congress ([[International Astronautical Federation]]). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Author: [[Geoffrey A. Landis]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Basic Principles of Beamed Microwave Power [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/22/3793/00141357.pdf?arnumber=141357  &lt;br /&gt;
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/iel1/22/3793/00141357.pdf?arnumber=141357  ]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Center for Space Power]] Â· A NASA Resarch Partnership Center [     Normal   0   14         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://blog.nss.org/?p=1113]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Student Thesis      Normal   0   14         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4          at Toulouse Business School, Toulouse, France.]] Â·      Normal   0   14         false   false   false                             MicrosoftInternetExplorer4          Financial and Organizational Analysis for a Space Solar Power System r [http://engineer.tamu.edu/tees/csp/ http://engineer.tamu.edu/tees/csp/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hardware]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Hardware Plans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Business]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Power Supply]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14868</id>
		<title>Talk:Team FREDNET</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14868"/>
		<updated>2009-01-05T00:11:30Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Requests for information */  Radiation environment throughout mission.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Requests for information ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I am a volunteer of Team FREDNET coordinating communications with Lunarpedia. We regularly need information about the space and lunar environment to support development of our lunar mission, and would be very appreciative if Lunarpedia contributors are able to help us out. I'm adding requests for such information in the list below, in order of importance (most important at top). Not all requests for information are 'mission critical', but in any event it will help draw as complete a picture of the mission environment as possible.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Radiation environment throughout mission'''. We need a thorough characterization of the radiation environment throughout a mission from the Earth to the Moon, including on Earth, in transit and on the Moon. It must be detailed enough to allow our engineers to design appropriate radiation shielding from the information. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: if you are interested in how to build space hardware for space environments, a good place to start is this book:  Space Mission Analysis and Design (Third Edition) (Softback) [James R. Wertz and Wiley J. Larson, eds. - 1999]; 969 pages, 1999, Microcosm/Kluwer; ISBN 978-1881883104 [http://astrobooks.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&amp;amp;ProdID=942];&lt;br /&gt;
     Then this: &lt;br /&gt;
Guide to Modeling Earth's Trapped Radiation Environment (Softback) [AIAA - 1999]     55 pgs, 1999, AIAA&lt;br /&gt;
ISBN 1-56347-349-6&lt;br /&gt;
  Then this:&lt;br /&gt;
 Introduction to the Space Environment (Second Edition) (Softback) [Thomas F. Tascione - 1994]     0445S&lt;br /&gt;
Thomas F. Tascione&lt;br /&gt;
151 pgs, 1994, Krieger Publishing&lt;br /&gt;
ISBN 978-0894640445&lt;br /&gt;
  &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Designers of Apollo RTG's'''. We have been considering using the SNAP-27 RTG's left by Apollo 12 through 17 on the lunar surface as a heat source during lunar night - even today these radioactive containers still radiate a considerable amount of heat to their surroundings. To determine the feasibility of using the RTG's like that, we would like to get in touch with the original designers of the Apollo SNAP-27 RTG's to ask them about the characteristics of the RTG's on the lunar surface so we can produce a thermal model of the units. We need contact information for these persons. All we currently know is that they worked at General Electric. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The RTGs are US government property.   You will need to discuss their usage with various US federal agencies with jurisdiction, e.g. NOAA, State Dept, DOE, NASA.    Technology of RTG will involve ITAR issues which will require export license for non-US citizens.    Contacting GE will do no good, they will simply direct you the US federal agencies.  Good luck. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Regolith composition at Apollo landing sites'''. The composition of regolith varies greatly with location on the Moon. We need to know the composition of the surface material at our landing site to calculate its frictional properties, which in turn will be used to design our rover. We have not selected a landing site yet, but it will most likely be one of the heritage Apollo landing sites. Hence, we need to know the exact geological composition of the lunar regolith at these sites. Since surface samples were taken by the Apollo astronauts, this information should be available from NASA in some form.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/alsj-sampcats.html Apollo Sample Catalogs]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TM-2005-213610.pdf The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TP-2006-213726.pdf The Apollo Experience Lessons Learned for Constellation Lunar Dust Management]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/19770020109_1977020109.pdf Lunar Sample Studies]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[JSC-1]] - ''Approximately 27,000 lb of JSC-1 simulant is currently available for distribution to qualified investigators. The only cost is for shipping. The material is stored at the Texas A&amp;amp;M Lunar Soil Simulant Laboratory. Investigators desiring a portion of this simulant should address their requests to Dr. Walter Boles, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&amp;amp;M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Telephone 409-845-2493, fax 409-862-2800).''&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[Lunar Dust]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the links - they have been integrated [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Tasks:Geological_composition_of_regolith_at_Apollo_sites here] and [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Talk:Lunar_Environment here] and [http://forum.xprize.frednet.com/viewtopic.php?p=2492#2492 here]. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Illuminance on the lunar surface'''. We are trying to figure out how (particularly, how brightly) objects on the lunar surface (not the lunar surface itself) are illuminated at various times of lunar day. We need this information to design visual systems (cameras) for our lander and rover. At least three sources of illuminance has to be taken into consideration: sunshine (light from the Sun), earthshine (sunlight reflected by Earth), and moonshine (sunlight reflected by the lunar surface itself). --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14867</id>
		<title>Talk:Team FREDNET</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14867"/>
		<updated>2009-01-05T00:07:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Requests for information */  * '''Radiation environment throughout mission'''&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Requests for information ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I am a volunteer of Team FREDNET coordinating communications with Lunarpedia. We regularly need information about the space and lunar environment to support development of our lunar mission, and would be very appreciative if Lunarpedia contributors are able to help us out. I'm adding requests for such information in the list below, in order of importance (most important at top). Not all requests for information are 'mission critical', but in any event it will help draw as complete a picture of the mission environment as possible.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Radiation environment throughout mission'''. We need a thorough characterization of the radiation environment throughout a mission from the Earth to the Moon, including on Earth, in transit and on the Moon. It must be detailed enough to allow our engineers to design appropriate radiation shielding from the information. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::: if you are interested in how to build space hardware for space environments, a good place to start is this book:  Space Mission Analysis and Design (Third Edition) (Softback) [James R. Wertz and Wiley J. Larson, eds. - 1999]; 969 pages, 1999, Microcosm/Kluwer; ISBN 978-1881883104 [http://astrobooks.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&amp;amp;ProdID=942]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Designers of Apollo RTG's'''. We have been considering using the SNAP-27 RTG's left by Apollo 12 through 17 on the lunar surface as a heat source during lunar night - even today these radioactive containers still radiate a considerable amount of heat to their surroundings. To determine the feasibility of using the RTG's like that, we would like to get in touch with the original designers of the Apollo SNAP-27 RTG's to ask them about the characteristics of the RTG's on the lunar surface so we can produce a thermal model of the units. We need contact information for these persons. All we currently know is that they worked at General Electric. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The RTGs are US government property.   You will need to discuss their usage with various US federal agencies with jurisdiction, e.g. NOAA, State Dept, DOE, NASA.    Technology of RTG will involve ITAR issues which will require export license for non-US citizens.    Contacting GE will do no good, they will simply direct you the US federal agencies.  Good luck. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Regolith composition at Apollo landing sites'''. The composition of regolith varies greatly with location on the Moon. We need to know the composition of the surface material at our landing site to calculate its frictional properties, which in turn will be used to design our rover. We have not selected a landing site yet, but it will most likely be one of the heritage Apollo landing sites. Hence, we need to know the exact geological composition of the lunar regolith at these sites. Since surface samples were taken by the Apollo astronauts, this information should be available from NASA in some form.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/alsj-sampcats.html Apollo Sample Catalogs]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TM-2005-213610.pdf The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TP-2006-213726.pdf The Apollo Experience Lessons Learned for Constellation Lunar Dust Management]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/19770020109_1977020109.pdf Lunar Sample Studies]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[JSC-1]] - ''Approximately 27,000 lb of JSC-1 simulant is currently available for distribution to qualified investigators. The only cost is for shipping. The material is stored at the Texas A&amp;amp;M Lunar Soil Simulant Laboratory. Investigators desiring a portion of this simulant should address their requests to Dr. Walter Boles, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&amp;amp;M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Telephone 409-845-2493, fax 409-862-2800).''&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[Lunar Dust]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the links - they have been integrated [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Tasks:Geological_composition_of_regolith_at_Apollo_sites here] and [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Talk:Lunar_Environment here] and [http://forum.xprize.frednet.com/viewtopic.php?p=2492#2492 here]. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Illuminance on the lunar surface'''. We are trying to figure out how (particularly, how brightly) objects on the lunar surface (not the lunar surface itself) are illuminated at various times of lunar day. We need this information to design visual systems (cameras) for our lander and rover. At least three sources of illuminance has to be taken into consideration: sunshine (light from the Sun), earthshine (sunlight reflected by Earth), and moonshine (sunlight reflected by the lunar surface itself). --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14866</id>
		<title>Talk:Team FREDNET</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14866"/>
		<updated>2009-01-04T23:36:37Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Requests for information */  formatting&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Requests for information ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I am a volunteer of Team FREDNET coordinating communications with Lunarpedia. We regularly need information about the space and lunar environment to support development of our lunar mission, and would be very appreciative if Lunarpedia contributors are able to help us out. I'm adding requests for such information in the list below, in order of importance (most important at top). Not all requests for information are 'mission critical', but in any event it will help draw as complete a picture of the mission environment as possible.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Radiation environment throughout mission'''. We need a thorough characterization of the radiation environment throughout a mission from the Earth to the Moon, including on Earth, in transit and on the Moon. It must be detailed enough to allow our engineers to design appropriate radiation shielding from the information. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Designers of Apollo RTG's'''. We have been considering using the SNAP-27 RTG's left by Apollo 12 through 17 on the lunar surface as a heat source during lunar night - even today these radioactive containers still radiate a considerable amount of heat to their surroundings. To determine the feasibility of using the RTG's like that, we would like to get in touch with the original designers of the Apollo SNAP-27 RTG's to ask them about the characteristics of the RTG's on the lunar surface so we can produce a thermal model of the units. We need contact information for these persons. All we currently know is that they worked at General Electric. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::The RTGs are US government property.   You will need to discuss their usage with various US federal agencies with jurisdiction, e.g. NOAA, State Dept, DOE, NASA.    Technology of RTG will involve ITAR issues which will require export license for non-US citizens.    Contacting GE will do no good, they will simply direct you the US federal agencies.  Good luck. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]]&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Regolith composition at Apollo landing sites'''. The composition of regolith varies greatly with location on the Moon. We need to know the composition of the surface material at our landing site to calculate its frictional properties, which in turn will be used to design our rover. We have not selected a landing site yet, but it will most likely be one of the heritage Apollo landing sites. Hence, we need to know the exact geological composition of the lunar regolith at these sites. Since surface samples were taken by the Apollo astronauts, this information should be available from NASA in some form.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/alsj-sampcats.html Apollo Sample Catalogs]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TM-2005-213610.pdf The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TP-2006-213726.pdf The Apollo Experience Lessons Learned for Constellation Lunar Dust Management]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/19770020109_1977020109.pdf Lunar Sample Studies]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[JSC-1]] - ''Approximately 27,000 lb of JSC-1 simulant is currently available for distribution to qualified investigators. The only cost is for shipping. The material is stored at the Texas A&amp;amp;M Lunar Soil Simulant Laboratory. Investigators desiring a portion of this simulant should address their requests to Dr. Walter Boles, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&amp;amp;M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Telephone 409-845-2493, fax 409-862-2800).''&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[Lunar Dust]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the links - they have been integrated [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Tasks:Geological_composition_of_regolith_at_Apollo_sites here] and [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Talk:Lunar_Environment here] and [http://forum.xprize.frednet.com/viewtopic.php?p=2492#2492 here]. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Illuminance on the lunar surface'''. We are trying to figure out how (particularly, how brightly) objects on the lunar surface (not the lunar surface itself) are illuminated at various times of lunar day. We need this information to design visual systems (cameras) for our lander and rover. At least three sources of illuminance has to be taken into consideration: sunshine (light from the Sun), earthshine (sunlight reflected by Earth), and moonshine (sunlight reflected by the lunar surface itself). --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14865</id>
		<title>Talk:Team FREDNET</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Team_FREDNET&amp;diff=14865"/>
		<updated>2009-01-04T23:34:05Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Requests for information */  RTGs are US government property.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== Requests for information ==&lt;br /&gt;
Hello, I am a volunteer of Team FREDNET coordinating communications with Lunarpedia. We regularly need information about the space and lunar environment to support development of our lunar mission, and would be very appreciative if Lunarpedia contributors are able to help us out. I'm adding requests for such information in the list below, in order of importance (most important at top). Not all requests for information are 'mission critical', but in any event it will help draw as complete a picture of the mission environment as possible.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Radiation environment throughout mission'''. We need a thorough characterization of the radiation environment throughout a mission from the Earth to the Moon, including on Earth, in transit and on the Moon. It must be detailed enough to allow our engineers to design appropriate radiation shielding from the information. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Designers of Apollo RTG's'''. We have been considering using the SNAP-27 RTG's left by Apollo 12 through 17 on the lunar surface as a heat source during lunar night - even today these radioactive containers still radiate a considerable amount of heat to their surroundings. To determine the feasibility of using the RTG's like that, we would like to get in touch with the original designers of the Apollo SNAP-27 RTG's to ask them about the characteristics of the RTG's on the lunar surface so we can produce a thermal model of the units. We need contact information for these persons. All we currently know is that they worked at General Electric. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Regolith composition at Apollo landing sites'''. The composition of regolith varies greatly with location on the Moon. We need to know the composition of the surface material at our landing site to calculate its frictional properties, which in turn will be used to design our rover. We have not selected a landing site yet, but it will most likely be one of the heritage Apollo landing sites. Hence, we need to know the exact geological composition of the lunar regolith at these sites. Since surface samples were taken by the Apollo astronauts, this information should be available from NASA in some form.--[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 13:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/alsj-sampcats.html Apollo Sample Catalogs]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TM-2005-213610.pdf The Effects of Lunar Dust on EVA Systems During the Apollo Missions]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/TP-2006-213726.pdf The Apollo Experience Lessons Learned for Constellation Lunar Dust Management]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[http://www.history.nasa.gov/alsj/19770020109_1977020109.pdf Lunar Sample Studies]&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[JSC-1]] - ''Approximately 27,000 lb of JSC-1 simulant is currently available for distribution to qualified investigators. The only cost is for shipping. The material is stored at the Texas A&amp;amp;M Lunar Soil Simulant Laboratory. Investigators desiring a portion of this simulant should address their requests to Dr. Walter Boles, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&amp;amp;M University, College Station, TX 77843 (Telephone 409-845-2493, fax 409-862-2800).''&lt;br /&gt;
::::[[Lunar Dust]]&lt;br /&gt;
:::::Thanks for the links - they have been integrated [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Tasks:Geological_composition_of_regolith_at_Apollo_sites here] and [http://wiki.xprize.frednet.org/index.php/Talk:Lunar_Environment here] and [http://forum.xprize.frednet.com/viewtopic.php?p=2492#2492 here]. --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 15:44, 4 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Illuminance on the lunar surface'''. We are trying to figure out how (particularly, how brightly) objects on the lunar surface (not the lunar surface itself) are illuminated at various times of lunar day. We need this information to design visual systems (cameras) for our lander and rover. At least three sources of illuminance has to be taken into consideration: sunshine (light from the Sun), earthshine (sunlight reflected by Earth), and moonshine (sunlight reflected by the lunar surface itself). --[[User:Anders Feder|Anders Feder]] 14:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The RTGs are US government property.   You will need to discuss their usage with various US federal agencies with jurisdiction, e.g. NOAA, State Dept, DOE, NASA.    Technology of RTG will involve ITAR issues which will require export license for non-US citizens.    Contacting GE will do no good, they will simply direct you the US federal agencies.  Good luck. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=14791</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=14791"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T14:01:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel */  fixed isotope descriptors&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=[[Lithium|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Li&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                   |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]]. This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;+&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed Deuterium-Tritium  fusion reaction &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H) --&amp;gt; &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + Neutron&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H -&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or &amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. Current market price for He3 is about $46,500 per troy ounce ($1500/gram, $1.5M/kg), more than 120 times the value per unit weight of [[Gold]] and over eight times the value of [[Rhodium]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $1500 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $150M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about half a billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $150M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost that much or more. How much He3 a small lander manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined and production will rely on the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $150M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded and the price drops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|An He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=14790</id>
		<title>Helium</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Helium&amp;diff=14790"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T13:50:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: /* Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel */  -&amp;gt; change D to &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Helium                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=He                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
number=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=4.002602                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
group=18                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Noble gases                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.1786 g/L                                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=0.95K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-272.2°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-458.0°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=4.22K,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-268.93°C,&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-452.07°F                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=3&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;4                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=[[Hydrogen|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;H&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=[[Lithium|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Li&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                   |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Neon|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Ne&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                     |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=[[Fluorine|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;F&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                 |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=31 pm                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=32                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=140                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=24.59                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=2                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=Unstable anion                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=-                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal or body centered cubic                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Helium''' is a component of the [[solar wind]], and hence is one of the [[volatiles]] found (in parts per million level) in [[Lunar regolith]]. It is a Noble gas in group 18 and is the second element in the [[Periodic Table of the Elements]]. This element has two stable isotopes: 3 and 4.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most common isotope, Helium-4, has a nucleus of two protons and two neutrons, and two electrons.  The less common isotope Helium-3 has two protons and one neutron.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He==&lt;br /&gt;
''Helium 3'' is a rare isotope of the element [[Helium]], consisting of a nucleus with two protons and one neutron.  The approved abbreviation (for physics use) for Helium-3 is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, however, the abbreviation He3 is also seen.  Since most of the Earth's helium is produced by alpha-decay of Uranium isotopes, resulting in &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He (the most common isotope of Helium), &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He is rare on Earth.  It is comparatively more abundant in non-terrestrial sources, although even in non-terrestrial sources, only a small fraction of helium atoms are Helium 3.  The [[Moon]] is a source of &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He, which is implanted into the lunar [[regolith]] by the [[solar wind]].  Helium is present in the soil in quantities of ten to a hundred (weight) parts per million, and  0.003 to 1 percent of this amount (depending on soil) is &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Helium 3 as a Fusion Reaction Fuel===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been proposed that &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He might be a possible fuel for a [[Nuclear Fusion]] reactor to produce energy using the thermo-nuclear reaction (Deuterium-Helium-3):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He --&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He + &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This reaction has the advantage over the more-commonly proposed D-T fusion reaction that the reaction produces only charged particles (an alpha particle and a proton), with no production of neutrons.  However, the corresponding difficulty is that the D-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He reaction has an ignition barrier that is twice as high as the barrier to igniting D-T fusion, because of the fact that the Helium nucleus has twice the charge of a Tritium nucleus.  Gerald Kulcinski's group at the Fusion Technology Institute of the [[University of Wisconsin-Madison]] has operated an experimental He3 fusion reactor for an extended period, on a non-governmental research budget &amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.thespacereview.com/article/536/1  Hedman, Eric; (Monday, January 16, 2006). &amp;quot;A fascinating hour with Gerald Kulcinski&amp;quot; (HTML). The Space Review. Jeff Foust, Ed. Retrieved on 2007-03-04]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;, however the reactor has not achieved energy balance or breakeven.  So far, &amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H-&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;He fusion has not yet demonstrated net energy production (&amp;quot;break even&amp;quot;). The development of commercial He3 reactors is dependent upon demonstrating &amp;quot;break even.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Value of Lunar Helium 3 in Today's Market===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since He3 has a high market value today, it might be worth collecting He3 from the Moon today simply to sell into the existing terrestrial market. Current market price for He3 is about $46,500 per troy ounce ($1500/gram, $1.5M/kg), more than 120 times the value per unit weight of [[Gold]] and over eight times the value of [[Rhodium]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*Can the cost of recovering He3 from the lunar surface be reduced to that level, e.g. $1500 per gram?&lt;br /&gt;
*What would be the capital cost of setting up a small He3 production facility on Luna?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would it depress the market price today?  This depends on the size of the market, and there is little data.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The US [[Tritium]] and helium-3 stockpile sizes are classified, because they give a hint as to how many US nuclear weapons are still functional.  According to Wikipedia “approximately 150 kilograms of it (He3) have resulted from decay of US [[Tritium]] production since 1955.”  One could assume a similar quantity has been accumulated in the ex-USSR, and perhaps additionally from other thermonuclear powers (UK, France, China).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Today, the world's supply of Helium-3 can be counted in hundreds of kilograms, and the value of 100 kg would be $150M.  So it may be assumed that the total stockpile value today is roughly about half a billion USD. The US DOE does sell He3 commercially, but how much of the present stockpile has actually been sold on the open market is an open question. Assuming that someone were to start at the level of collecting 100kg of He3 from the Moon and assume its value would be $150M, the cost of soft landing even a small probe on to the lunar surface may easily cost that much or more. How much He3 a small lander manufacture and how many grams per day have yet to be determined and production will rely on the method of processing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Volatiles|commonly discussed method]] is cooking the [[regolith]] to about 1400 degrees Fahrenheit or 760 degrees Celsius&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/pdf/fdm817.pdf H. H. Schmitt et al; (November 1989). &amp;quot;Mining Helium-3 from the Moon - A Solution to the Earth's Energy Needs in the 21st Century.&amp;quot;]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;. They describe three steps:&lt;br /&gt;
1) heat to a few hundred deg C to drive off the volatiles 2) fractional distillation to decant off the heavy volatiles 3) separate He3 from the He4 using the standard superleak process. Two challenges are devising a method to process large quantities of regolith as the He3 is at a low concentration, and providing a high power thermally efficient heat source on the Moon. This would need a large amount of energy, requiring the lander to have either a nuclear source (either [[Nuclear Fission]] or [[RTG]]), or large [[Solar Power|solar panels]]. [[Basalt]] has specific heat capacity of 0.24 cal/g/degreeC or 0.84 KJ/kg degreeK.  To heat 1kg of basalt by 700 degrees Celsius requires about 600 KJ.  The highest concentration of He3 in the Maria regions is 0.01ppm in the regolith.  This means that 600 KJ will yield  0.01 milligrams of He3.  Using these numbers, a 600 Watt power source could produce 0.01 milligrams of He3 per second = 0.6 mg/minute = 36mg/hour = 864mg/day = 315 grams per year. Whether this business concept is viable depends on how quickly a group or entity wants to amortize their investment. If an arbitrary target is to produce 100 kg He3 in one year, then a power source of about 200 KW would be needed.  That would give a revenue stream of $150M per year '''if''' the He3 market does not become flooded and the price drops.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A [[Solar Power]] based system would be in darkness 50% of the time, so would need to operate at 400 KW. If it were on a lunar polar mountain top it might be in near continuous illumination.  Assuming a best case scenario of 100% lighting, 10% photo voltaic efficiency and a fully steerable array, this would need an area of about 2,000 square meters, or about 45 meters on a square side.  A simple non-PV solar reflector could be near 100% efficient, needing only 200 square meters or about 14 meters on a square side, or aperture. Setting up a 14 meter aperture mirror on the Moon would be a major engineering challenge, although it would not need to be particularly accurate as in the case of an astronomical telescope mirror.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Open Questions:&lt;br /&gt;
*How much would a 14 meter aperture mirror weigh?&lt;br /&gt;
*Would a [[Nuclear Fission]] power plant have better performance per kilogram of lander payload?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More thermal analysis needs to be done, as it may be possible to recycle the heat using some form of cogeneration.   One possibility is to use the hot processed regolith to pre-heat the next incoming batch of raw dust, and thus reduce the number of solar joules needed. This could greatly reduce the size of solar array needed and/or significantly increase the system mass throughput.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Applications  ==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Image:Laser_DSC09088.JPG|thumb|right|px|An He-Ne laser]]&lt;br /&gt;
*Medical Lung Imaging&lt;br /&gt;
:According to Wikipedia: &lt;br /&gt;
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helium_3&lt;br /&gt;
:Details on this experimental application of He3: http://cerncourier.com/main/article/41/8/14&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{expandsec}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Resource Values | Value of commodities (including He3)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== External Links ==&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.tunl.duke.edu/nucldata/HTML/A=3/03He_1987.shtml Nuclear data]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==References==&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Cleanup}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Noble Gases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Hydrogen&amp;diff=14789</id>
		<title>Hydrogen</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Hydrogen&amp;diff=14789"/>
		<updated>2008-12-31T13:48:14Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: fixed isotope symbol definitions&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Element                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
name=Hydrogen                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
symbol=H                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
available=trace                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
need=critical                                                                            |&lt;br /&gt;
number=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
mass=1.00794                                                                             |&lt;br /&gt;
group=1                                                                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
period=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
phase=Gas                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
series=Non-metals                                                                        |&lt;br /&gt;
density=0.08988 g/L                                                                      |&lt;br /&gt;
melts=14.175K&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-258.975°C&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-434°F                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
boils=20.418K&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-252.732°C&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;-422.918°F                                |&lt;br /&gt;
isotopes=1&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;2                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
prior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
next=[[Helium|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;He&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                    |&lt;br /&gt;
above=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
aprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
anext=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt;  |&lt;br /&gt;
below=[[Lithium|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Li&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                  |&lt;br /&gt;
bprior=&amp;lt;SMALL&amp;gt;&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7F7F&amp;quot;&amp;gt;N/A&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/SMALL&amp;gt; |&lt;br /&gt;
bnext=[[Beryllium|&amp;lt;FONT color=&amp;quot;#7F7FFF&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Be&amp;lt;/FONT&amp;gt;]]                |&lt;br /&gt;
radius=25                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
bohr=53                                                                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
covalent=37                                                                              |&lt;br /&gt;
vdwr=120                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
irad=-                                                                                   |&lt;br /&gt;
ipot=13.60                                                                               |&lt;br /&gt;
econfig=1s&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;                                                       |&lt;br /&gt;
eshell=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
enega=2.2                                                                                |&lt;br /&gt;
eaffin=                                                                                  |&lt;br /&gt;
oxstat=1                                                                                 |&lt;br /&gt;
magn=                                                                                    |&lt;br /&gt;
cryst=Hexagonal                                                                          |&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hydrogen''' is a Non-metal in group 1.&lt;br /&gt;
It has a Hexagonal crystalline structure.&lt;br /&gt;
This element has two stable isotopes: 1 and 2.  &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;&amp;lt;BR/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Natural Isotopes&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H   (single electron, single proton)&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H Deuterium (single electron, single proton, single neutron)&lt;br /&gt;
Synthetic Isotopes&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H Tritium  (single electron, single proton, two neutrons)&lt;br /&gt;
**12.33 year half life.  Undergoes Beta Decay to become [[Helium 3]]([[He3]])&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;4&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;H &lt;br /&gt;
**Undergoes immediate Neutron Decay to become Tritium(H3)&lt;br /&gt;
---------------------&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hydrogen''' is the simplest, lightest, and first element formed after the big bang.  It is the most common element, making up approx 90% of the universe by weight.  Hydrogen is one of the highly useful and necessary elements believed to be in critically short supply on Luna.  Its most common nuclear permutation (isotope) is a single proton, although it can also exist with one (deuterium) or two (tritium) neutrons.  On Earth, hydrogen is most commonly found combined with [[oxygen]] in the form of [[water]] (H&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;2&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;O).  The Moon is much smaller than Earth, hence its gravity is not strong enough to retain liquid oceans nor gaseous amtosphere; most of the volatiles of the Moon, including hydrogen, have long since evaporated and escaped into space.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Common uses of hydrogen which may be applied on the Moon include: rocket fuel, hydrogen fuel cells, [[ilmenite reduction]], [[reduction]] of metal ores and nitrogen fixation.&lt;br /&gt;
Deuterium/tritium can be as fuel used in nuclear fusion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hydrogen has possibly been detected at the Lunar poles, but the amount available has been a topic of controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/periodic/H.html Environmental Chemistry: Hydrogen]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.webelements.com/webelements/elements/text/H/key.html WebElements: Hydrogen]&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Autostub}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Gases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Non-metals ]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Critical and Essential Elements]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!-- Generated by a gamma candidate version of Autostub2 (Test 9) --&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Indian_Space_Research_Organization&amp;diff=13689</id>
		<title>Indian Space Research Organization</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Indian_Space_Research_Organization&amp;diff=13689"/>
		<updated>2008-10-23T20:21:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: Quote from [http://www.isro.org/ their web site]:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Indian Space Research Organization(ISRO)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quote from [http://www.isro.org/ their web site]:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The prime objective of ISRO is to develop space technology and its application to various national tasks. ISRO has established two major space systems, INSAT for communication, television broadcasting and meteorological services, and Indian Remote Sensing Satellites (IRS) system for resources monitoring and management. ISRO has developed two satellite launch vehicles, PSLV and GSLV, to place INSAT and IRS satellites in the required orbits. &amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 22nd October 2008, ISRO launched India's first probe to the Moon, [[Chandrayaan-1]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Chandrayaan-1&amp;diff=13688</id>
		<title>Chandrayaan-1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Chandrayaan-1&amp;diff=13688"/>
		<updated>2008-10-23T20:17:44Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: added year&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Subminimal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrayaan 1 is an [[Indian Space Research Organization|Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)]] mission to orbit the moon for two years, gathering scientific information and testing India's space capabilities.  Based upon the Kalpansat weather satellite, it is a 1.5 meter bus weighing approx. 523 kg.  Chandrayaan carries a 29kg Moon Impact Probe (MIP) and a 55kg scientific payload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spacecraft was successfully launched on PSLV on October 22nd 2008. [http://www.isro.org/pressrelease/Oct22_2008.htm Here is the ISRO press release]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Instrumentation==&lt;br /&gt;
The scientific payload consists of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indigenous&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain Mapping Camera ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/tmc.htm TMC]) with a 5 meter resolution.&lt;br /&gt;
*Hyper Spectral Imager ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/hysi.htm HySi]) for mineralogical mapping in the 400-900 nanometer band.  Spectral resolution of 15 nanometers.  Spacial resolution of 80 meters.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lunar Laser Ranging Instrument ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/llri.htm LLRI]) for mapping lunar topography.&lt;br /&gt;
*High Energy X-ray/gamma ray spectromenter ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/hex.htm HEX]).  30 - 250 keV range.  Designed to detect the decay products of [[Uranium]] and [[Thorium]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Moon Impact Probe ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/mip.htm MIP]).  29 kg released from a 100km orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
Foreign&lt;br /&gt;
*Imaging X-Ray Spectrometer ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/cixs_esa.htm C1XS]).  1-10 keV range fluorescence.  Ground resolution of 10km.  Measures abundance of elemental Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Fe, and Ti on the lunar surface.  Through [[ESA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Near Infra Red spectrometer ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/sir-2_esa.htm SIR-2]). 0.93-2.4 μm range. 6nm spectral resolution.  Through [[ESA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sub KeV Atom Reflecting Analyser ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/sara_esa.htm SARA]). Through [[ESA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Radiation Dose Monitor Experiment ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/radom_bas.htm RADOM]). From Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
*Miniature Synthetic Aperture Radar ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/minisar_nasa.htm MiniSAR]). Through [[NASA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Moon Mineralogy Mapper ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/mmm_nasa.htm M3]). Through [[NASA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar orbiting spacecraft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference: [http://www.moondaily.com/reports/India_Spacecraft_For_Moon_To_Take_Off_Next_Year_999.html scheduled for launch March 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sponsor: [[Indian Space Research Organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.chandrayaan-1.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=CHANDRYN1 NSSDC ID: CHANDRYN1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mission Plans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Probes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Chandrayaan-1&amp;diff=13687</id>
		<title>Chandrayaan-1</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Chandrayaan-1&amp;diff=13687"/>
		<updated>2008-10-23T20:17:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: launched....ISRO press release&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Subminimal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chandrayaan 1 is an [[Indian Space Research Organization|Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)]] mission to orbit the moon for two years, gathering scientific information and testing India's space capabilities.  Based upon the Kalpansat weather satellite, it is a 1.5 meter bus weighing approx. 523 kg.  Chandrayaan carries a 29kg Moon Impact Probe (MIP) and a 55kg scientific payload.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spacecraft was successfully launched on PSLV on October 22nd. [http://www.isro.org/pressrelease/Oct22_2008.htm Here is the ISRO press release]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Instrumentation==&lt;br /&gt;
The scientific payload consists of the following:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Indigenous&lt;br /&gt;
*Terrain Mapping Camera ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/tmc.htm TMC]) with a 5 meter resolution.&lt;br /&gt;
*Hyper Spectral Imager ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/hysi.htm HySi]) for mineralogical mapping in the 400-900 nanometer band.  Spectral resolution of 15 nanometers.  Spacial resolution of 80 meters.&lt;br /&gt;
*Lunar Laser Ranging Instrument ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/llri.htm LLRI]) for mapping lunar topography.&lt;br /&gt;
*High Energy X-ray/gamma ray spectromenter ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/hex.htm HEX]).  30 - 250 keV range.  Designed to detect the decay products of [[Uranium]] and [[Thorium]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Moon Impact Probe ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/mip.htm MIP]).  29 kg released from a 100km orbit.&lt;br /&gt;
Foreign&lt;br /&gt;
*Imaging X-Ray Spectrometer ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/cixs_esa.htm C1XS]).  1-10 keV range fluorescence.  Ground resolution of 10km.  Measures abundance of elemental Mg, Al, Si, Ca, Fe, and Ti on the lunar surface.  Through [[ESA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Near Infra Red spectrometer ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/sir-2_esa.htm SIR-2]). 0.93-2.4 μm range. 6nm spectral resolution.  Through [[ESA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Sub KeV Atom Reflecting Analyser ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/sara_esa.htm SARA]). Through [[ESA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Radiation Dose Monitor Experiment ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/radom_bas.htm RADOM]). From Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.&lt;br /&gt;
*Miniature Synthetic Aperture Radar ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/minisar_nasa.htm MiniSAR]). Through [[NASA]].&lt;br /&gt;
*Moon Mineralogy Mapper ([http://www.isro.org/chandrayaan/htmls/mmm_nasa.htm M3]). Through [[NASA]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar orbiting spacecraft.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reference: [http://www.moondaily.com/reports/India_Spacecraft_For_Moon_To_Take_Off_Next_Year_999.html scheduled for launch March 2008]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sponsor: [[Indian Space Research Organization]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.chandrayaan-1.com/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External Links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=CHANDRYN1 NSSDC ID: CHANDRYN1]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mission Plans]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Probes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Farred&amp;diff=12010</id>
		<title>User talk:Farred</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Farred&amp;diff=12010"/>
		<updated>2008-05-10T16:06:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: snail mail address for Lunarpedia&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This page awaits comments.  --[[User:Farred|Farred]] 23:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Farred, you ask about snail mail address for Lunarpedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunarpedia is an asset of the Moon Society, and this is the address:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://moonsociety.org/about/contact.php3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Moon Society&lt;br /&gt;
P.O. Box 940825&lt;br /&gt;
Plano, TX 75094-0825 [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 16:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=User:Farred&amp;diff=11945</id>
		<title>User:Farred</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=User:Farred&amp;diff=11945"/>
		<updated>2008-05-04T14:19:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: article tab versus discussion tab&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;FYI, you shouldn't sign your entries on articles, just on the discussion pages - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 02:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, please note the difference between discussion tab and article tab.&lt;br /&gt;
You posted some info on the Tethers article which really belonged as a discussion rather than the article itself, so I moved it to the discussion tab.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feel free to reword the article itself to confirm to the comments in the discussion. Thanks. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 14:19, 4 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Tether&amp;diff=11943</id>
		<title>Talk:Tether</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:Tether&amp;diff=11943"/>
		<updated>2008-05-04T14:15:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: moved to here froim ain content page&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;What is the purpose of redirecting this page?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure I see a purpose in moving it either. There will be many different applications for tethers and some of those will be Luna specific. -- [[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 20:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tethers versus Mass Drivers==&lt;br /&gt;
There is an incorrect statement on exoplatz at http://www.exoplatz.org/index.php?title=Tether.  It is written: &amp;quot;It (a tether) has an advantage over mass driver in that it can be used to soft land on the Moon as well as depart from the Moon.&amp;quot;  When one considers that a mass driver can be built in orbit around Luna, it is not hard to see how a mass driver can be used to soft land cargo on Luna.  A mass driver can orbit as close to a Lunar mountain peak as a tether can.  If it accelerates cargo to the rear at orbital velocity relative to itself as it goes past a mountain peak, that cargo is brought to a stop relative to Luna.  Further, there is no physical law that would be broken to develop (at some future time) the ability for cargo in orbit to rendezvous with a carrier on Luna travling on a magnetically levitating track at orbital velocity and then slowing the cargo to a stop by regenerative braking (hopefully before reaching the end of the track).  --[[User:Farred|Farred]] 01:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Farred&amp;diff=11942</id>
		<title>User talk:Farred</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Farred&amp;diff=11942"/>
		<updated>2008-05-04T14:12:31Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: welcome&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Welcome Farred. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 14:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Transient_lunar_phenomena&amp;diff=11889</id>
		<title>Transient lunar phenomena</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Transient_lunar_phenomena&amp;diff=11889"/>
		<updated>2008-04-19T13:54:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: {{selene Stub}}&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Transient lunar phenomena (TLP) sometimes called &amp;quot;Lunar transient phenomena&amp;quot; (LTP) have been widely reported by many astronomers, mostly by amateurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They might be associated with [[Lunar outgassing]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{selene Stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Transient_lunar_phenomena&amp;diff=11888</id>
		<title>Transient lunar phenomena</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Transient_lunar_phenomena&amp;diff=11888"/>
		<updated>2008-04-19T13:53:04Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: Category:Selenology&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Transient lunar phenomena (TLP) sometimes called &amp;quot;Lunar transient phenomena&amp;quot; (LTP) have been widely reported by many astronomers, mostly by amateurs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They might be associated with [[Lunar outgassing]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Selenology]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=X-Prize_Lunar_Lander_Challenge&amp;diff=11879</id>
		<title>X-Prize Lunar Lander Challenge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=X-Prize_Lunar_Lander_Challenge&amp;diff=11879"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T19:10:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: category:Contests and Challenges&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[X-Prize]] Foundation is currently running a contest to demonstrate a lunar lander vehicle on Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''[[X-Prize Lunar Lander Challenge]]'' [http://space.xprize.org/lunar-lander-challenge/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [[category:Contests and Challenges]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Google_Lunar_X_Prize&amp;diff=11878</id>
		<title>Google Lunar X Prize</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Google_Lunar_X_Prize&amp;diff=11878"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T19:09:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: corrected URL&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[X-Prize]] organization is currently running a contest with a 30 million dollar prize for the first private lunar rover. [http://www.googlelunarxprize.org/]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The winner must minimally:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# Safely land a robot on the surface of the Moon&lt;br /&gt;
# Travel 500 meters&lt;br /&gt;
# Send images and data to Earth&lt;br /&gt;
# Be 90% privately funded&lt;br /&gt;
# Complete by December 31, 2014&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 [[category:Contests and Challenges]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=X-Prize_Lunar_Lander_Challenge&amp;diff=11877</id>
		<title>X-Prize Lunar Lander Challenge</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=X-Prize_Lunar_Lander_Challenge&amp;diff=11877"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T19:07:59Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: correction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The [[X-Prize]] Foundation is currently running a contest to demonstrate a lunar lander vehicle on Earth. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''[[X-Prize Lunar Lander Challenge]]'' [http://space.xprize.org/lunar-lander-challenge/]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Kaguya&amp;diff=11876</id>
		<title>Kaguya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Kaguya&amp;diff=11876"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T19:04:27Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: An initial report of the missions results, including videos and photos, is published at this web link: http://www.iafastro.org/index.php?id=554&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Subminimal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar orbiter spacecraft.  Formerly named &amp;quot;Selene&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/missions/selene/index.shtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sponsor: [[Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)]] http://www.jaxa.jp/index_e.html &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Successfully orbiting the Moon as of March 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An initial report of the missions results, including videos and photos, is published at this web link: http://www.iafastro.org/index.php?id=554&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Missions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mission Plans]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Chang%E2%80%99e_I&amp;diff=11875</id>
		<title>Chang’e I</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Chang%E2%80%99e_I&amp;diff=11875"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T19:02:55Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: Successfully orbiting the Moon and returning images as of March 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Mission Stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chief scientist: [[Ouyang Ziyuan]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Launch scheduled for Feb 2007 according to Chinaview (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.cast.ac.cn/CastEn/Show.asp?ArticleID=19824&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Launch scheduled for April 2007 according to People's Daily (see below).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200607/25/eng20060725_286474.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200311/08/eng20031108_127893.shtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200607/26/eng20060726_286703.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200605/18/eng20060518_266794.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Successfully orbiting the Moon and returning images as of March 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An initial report of the missions results, including videos and photos, is published at this web link: http://www.iafastro.org/index.php?id=554&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Missions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mission Plans]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Kaguya&amp;diff=11874</id>
		<title>Kaguya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Kaguya&amp;diff=11874"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T18:59:24Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: Category:Spacecraft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;{{Subminimal}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lunar orbiter spacecraft.  Formerly named &amp;quot;Selene&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.isas.jaxa.jp/e/enterp/missions/selene/index.shtml&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sponsor: [[Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)]] http://www.jaxa.jp/index_e.html &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Spacecraft]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Missions]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mission Plans]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=SELENE&amp;diff=11873</id>
		<title>SELENE</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=SELENE&amp;diff=11873"/>
		<updated>2008-03-29T18:57:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Cfrjlr: #REDIRECT&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;#REDIRECT:[[Kaguya]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Cfrjlr</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>