View source for Talk:Politics of Science Fiction

Thank you for your edit. I would like you to consider a couple ideas:

'''First''', although politics is usually discussed as a line with a left and a right, it is really a circle.  If you go far enough left, you reach the right.  If you go far enough right, you reach the left.  A great many people make this trip through their lives. 

The backside bridge is the space in which the libertarians live.  It is a wonderful space of great power.  Both sides claim them and both sides treat them as traders.  They close a gap that turns out not even to exist.

'''Second''', the American people, who we wish to pay for our lunar settlement one way or another, form a bell curve centered on the political line.  Some times the center is a little to the left and sometimes it is a little to the right, but it does not move either way more  than a percentage point or two.

What it does not do is split into two peaks.  Amazing it did not even split at the peak of the great depression.  It certainly did not split over the war in Southeast Asia.  I as in the streets for that one.

You can argue that the bell may be a bit wide at times, or that the tails are fat, but the peak of the bell never splits.

Now the talk show commentators are split, the politicians are split, and the radio jocks are split.  Who cares?  What counts are the American people, and they are one of the most amazingly consistent groups in human history.  This is amazing and you forget it at your own peril.

--[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 15:29, 5 March 2007 (PST)

-----