Talk:Carbon Economy - Revision history

Jotagiraldez: moved Talk:Carbon economy to Talk:Carbon Economy: Title with capital letter E

2010-11-10T02:00:21Z

moved Talk:Carbon economy to Talk:Carbon Economy: Title with capital letter E

Jotagiraldez at 01:28, 8 November 2010

2010-11-08T01:28:53Z

Farred: /* Carbon importation */ talk

2010-11-07T01:56:48Z

Carbon importation: talk

Jotagiraldez: /* Carbon economy as a title */

2010-11-06T21:59:55Z

Carbon economy as a title

Mdelaney: /* Carbon economy as a title */

2007-04-04T22:24:11Z

Carbon economy as a title

Mdelaney: /* Carbon economy as a title */

2007-04-04T22:23:10Z

Carbon economy as a title

Mdelaney: Carbon economy as a title

2007-04-04T22:22:39Z

Carbon economy as a title

New page

== Carbon economy as a title ==

I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Just my 2c worth. -- [[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Carbon importation ==
@@ Line 17: / Line 22: @@
 --[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jotagiraldez]] 21:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 :If there gets to be enough material containing carbon, nitrogen, chlorine and hydrogen on Luna that is scrap or can be replaced by local materials so it can be scrapped; then it should be reasonable to start an industry that can recycle that scrap.  I think it would be a while before Luna gets to that stage, but it should be kept in mind.  --[[User:Farred|Farred]] 01:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:56, 7 November 2010
Line 16:		Line 16:

	--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jotagiraldez]] 21:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)		--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jotagiraldez]] 21:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	:It is customary to put new discussion threads at the bottom of the page.
		+	:If there gets to be enough material containing carbon, nitrogen, chlorine and hydrogen on Luna that is scrap or can be replaced by local materials so it can be scrapped; then it should be reasonable to start an industry that can recycle that scrap. I think it would be a while before Luna gets to that stage, but it should be kept in mind. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 01:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

	== Carbon economy as a title ==		== Carbon economy as a title ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Carbon economy as a title ==
-I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Just my 2c worth.<br>
+I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Natually I can't think of a better name either. Just my 2c worth.<br>
 -- [[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 4 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Carbon economy as a title ==		== Carbon economy as a title ==

−	I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Just my 2c worth. -- [[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering.	+	I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Just my 2c worth.<br>
		+	-- [[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering.

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:00, 10 November 2010
(No difference)