Talk:Jose Giraldez - Revision history

Jotagiraldez: /* Is it spam? */

2012-06-02T23:06:44Z

Is it spam?

Farred: Is it spam?

2012-06-02T20:21:02Z

Is it spam?

Farred: Spammers are parasites.

2012-05-08T16:13:03Z

Spammers are parasites.

Farred: Thanks for heads-up

2011-12-09T02:50:09Z

Thanks for heads-up

207.114.25.104: /* Thanks for update on Luanr Settlement */ new section

2010-11-13T22:10:55Z

Thanks for update on Luanr Settlement: new section

Jotagiraldez: moved User talk:Jotagiraldez to Talk:Jose Giraldez: My name....

2010-11-13T21:06:36Z

moved User talk:Jotagiraldez to Talk:Jose Giraldez: My name....

Farred: talk

2010-11-11T23:29:15Z

talk

Jotagiraldez at 02:52, 10 November 2010

2010-11-10T02:52:10Z

Farred: The spelling of aluminium

2010-11-10T02:39:49Z

The spelling of aluminium

Jotagiraldez at 19:22, 9 November 2010

2010-11-09T19:22:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:06, 2 June 2012
Line 55:		Line 55:
	==Is it spam?==		==Is it spam?==
	I was unsure of the contributions of User:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan. See [[User talk:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan\|the talk page]]. - [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 20:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)		I was unsure of the contributions of User:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan. See [[User talk:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan\|the talk page]]. - [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 20:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
		+	:Yes, it is spam.--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 23:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 2 June 2012
Line 52:		Line 52:

	Spammers are the parasites of the internet. They post irrelevant messages on wikis where they are not wanted. They do so with automated programs that can post thousands of copies of their garbage link backs. They poison search engines so that their mechanically created irrelevant sites are displayed instead of what the user of the search engine is looking for. We are at war with the spammers. Please do not do anything to help them or their employers. - [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 16:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)		Spammers are the parasites of the internet. They post irrelevant messages on wikis where they are not wanted. They do so with automated programs that can post thousands of copies of their garbage link backs. They poison search engines so that their mechanically created irrelevant sites are displayed instead of what the user of the search engine is looking for. We are at war with the spammers. Please do not do anything to help them or their employers. - [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 16:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Is it spam?==
		+	I was unsure of the contributions of User:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan. See [[User talk:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan\|the talk page]]. - [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 20:21, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 8 May 2012
Line 47:		Line 47:
	:Hi Jose,		:Hi Jose,
	There are some plenty strange folks out there who vandalize Lunarpedia. I do not see how any money could result from that spam article about Limos. At least it is good to know there is someone who actually cares a bit about Lunarpedia. [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 02:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)		There are some plenty strange folks out there who vandalize Lunarpedia. I do not see how any money could result from that spam article about Limos. At least it is good to know there is someone who actually cares a bit about Lunarpedia. [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 02:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Spammers are parasites.==
		+	Thanks for starting the heart monitor article. However there is something that you should keep in mind.
		+
		+	Spammers are the parasites of the internet. They post irrelevant messages on wikis where they are not wanted. They do so with automated programs that can post thousands of copies of their garbage link backs. They poison search engines so that their mechanically created irrelevant sites are displayed instead of what the user of the search engine is looking for. We are at war with the spammers. Please do not do anything to help them or their employers. - [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 16:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 9 December 2011
Line 43:		Line 43:

	--[[Special:Contributions/207.114.25.104\|207.114.25.104]] 22:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)		--[[Special:Contributions/207.114.25.104\|207.114.25.104]] 22:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Thanks for the heads-up about a deletable article==
		+	:Hi Jose,
		+	There are some plenty strange folks out there who vandalize Lunarpedia. I do not see how any money could result from that spam article about Limos. At least it is good to know there is someone who actually cares a bit about Lunarpedia. [[User:Farred\|Farred]] 02:50, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:10, 13 November 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:
	:Jotagiraldez:		:Jotagiraldez:
	:I agree with your suggestion of the 10th of November that we should wait and see what the community decides about the spelling of aluminum, but if no one other than we two is concerned enough to comment, let's go with aluminium. You seem to prefer it and have some basis for preferring it. Besides, having someone who is actually competent to make constructive edits visit this web site is a rare and valuable thing. You are more valuable than spelling aluminum one way or another. I do not think either North Americans or those from the rest of the world will be sufficiently put off by a non favored spelling of aluminum that they will fail to gather valuable information from Lunarpedia. I hope we can actually have enough worthwhile information here, mixed into the dross that is already here, so that we can further the goal of making mankind a spacefaring species. I count on readers being smart enough to judge what is valuable and suitable to their purposes, so l let a few things remain here that I would not have contributed. Meanwhile, any improvements you can make are welcome. Any questions you might have I will make an effort to answer. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 23:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)		:I agree with your suggestion of the 10th of November that we should wait and see what the community decides about the spelling of aluminum, but if no one other than we two is concerned enough to comment, let's go with aluminium. You seem to prefer it and have some basis for preferring it. Besides, having someone who is actually competent to make constructive edits visit this web site is a rare and valuable thing. You are more valuable than spelling aluminum one way or another. I do not think either North Americans or those from the rest of the world will be sufficiently put off by a non favored spelling of aluminum that they will fail to gather valuable information from Lunarpedia. I hope we can actually have enough worthwhile information here, mixed into the dross that is already here, so that we can further the goal of making mankind a spacefaring species. I count on readers being smart enough to judge what is valuable and suitable to their purposes, so l let a few things remain here that I would not have contributed. Meanwhile, any improvements you can make are welcome. Any questions you might have I will make an effort to answer. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 23:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Thanks for update on Luanr Settlement ==
		+
		+	Thank you for the updates on the "Lunar Settlement" entry.
		+
		+	I am currently working to update the short stories based on this settlement to reflect the new lunar data.
		+
		+	I am also working to build a progressive argument for lunar settlement. The approach cutoff last fall, Constellation, was very conservative and we did nothing to make the idea attractive to the new administration so of course they canceled it.
		+
		+	Please let me know if any of these ideas are of interest to you.
		+
		+	Thanks,
		+
		+	--[[Special:Contributions/207.114.25.104\|207.114.25.104]] 22:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 11 November 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	I really do not know what to do. You are convincing. Lets wait to see what happens... Perhaps the users are going to change everything to aluminum... The community will decide.		I really do not know what to do. You are convincing. Lets wait to see what happens... Perhaps the users are going to change everything to aluminum... The community will decide.
		+
		+	:Jotagiraldez:
		+	:I agree with your suggestion of the 10th of November that we should wait and see what the community decides about the spelling of aluminum, but if no one other than we two is concerned enough to comment, let's go with aluminium. You seem to prefer it and have some basis for preferring it. Besides, having someone who is actually competent to make constructive edits visit this web site is a rare and valuable thing. You are more valuable than spelling aluminum one way or another. I do not think either North Americans or those from the rest of the world will be sufficiently put off by a non favored spelling of aluminum that they will fail to gather valuable information from Lunarpedia. I hope we can actually have enough worthwhile information here, mixed into the dross that is already here, so that we can further the goal of making mankind a spacefaring species. I count on readers being smart enough to judge what is valuable and suitable to their purposes, so l let a few things remain here that I would not have contributed. Meanwhile, any improvements you can make are welcome. Any questions you might have I will make an effort to answer. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 23:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 10 November 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:
	== The spelling of aluminium ==		== The spelling of aluminium ==
	Jotagiraldez, you seem very productive and talented but one thing I would disagree with is the spelling of aluminum being changed to aluminium, the British variant that my spell checker flags as an error. I give an argument for the old spelling on the [[Talk:Aluminium]] page if you care to look. You claim IUPAC favors aluminium, but you gave no source so I cannot check the nature of their support. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 02:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)		Jotagiraldez, you seem very productive and talented but one thing I would disagree with is the spelling of aluminum being changed to aluminium, the British variant that my spell checker flags as an error. I give an argument for the old spelling on the [[Talk:Aluminium]] page if you care to look. You claim IUPAC favors aluminium, but you gave no source so I cannot check the nature of their support. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 02:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Aluminium/aluminum ==
		+
		+	I really do not know what to do. You are convincing. Lets wait to see what happens... Perhaps the users are going to change everything to aluminum... The community will decide.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 10 November 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	English is for me a tool. I am still learning. I didn't meant to offend you or something. Sorry about EEUU, I'm not very good in writing. I do not feel underestimated.		English is for me a tool. I am still learning. I didn't meant to offend you or something. Sorry about EEUU, I'm not very good in writing. I do not feel underestimated.

−	I do not think England has to do anything with this. I have English and American friends and I do not prefer one over another. --[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jotagiraldez]] 19:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)	+	I do not think England has to do anything with this. I have English and American friends and I do not prefer one over another. --[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jotagiraldez]] 19:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== The spelling of aluminium ==
		+	Jotagiraldez, you seem very productive and talented but one thing I would disagree with is the spelling of aluminum being changed to aluminium, the British variant that my spell checker flags as an error. I give an argument for the old spelling on the [[Talk:Aluminium]] page if you care to look. You claim IUPAC favors aluminium, but you gave no source so I cannot check the nature of their support. --[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 02:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 9 November 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:
	English is for me a tool. I am still learning. I didn't meant to offend you or something. Sorry about EEUU, I'm not very good in writing. I do not feel underestimated.		English is for me a tool. I am still learning. I didn't meant to offend you or something. Sorry about EEUU, I'm not very good in writing. I do not feel underestimated.

−	I do not think England has to do anything with this. I have English and American friends and I do not prefer one over another.	+	I do not think England has to do anything with this. I have English and American friends and I do not prefer one over another. --[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jotagiraldez]] 19:22, 9 November 2010 (UTC)