Talk:List of Boosters - Revision history

Cfrjlr: /* Transition */ Yes we are good to go, they are all covered. Please redirect asap. Thanks.

2007-01-20T15:56:27Z

Transition: Yes we are good to go, they are all covered. Please redirect asap. Thanks.

Cfrjlr: Let me check those lists right quick

2007-01-20T15:36:49Z

Let me check those lists right quick

Strangelv: Is there anything left for the transition or is it now safe to turn this page into a redirect?

2007-01-20T14:53:17Z

Is there anything left for the transition or is it now safe to turn this page into a redirect?

Cfrjlr: signing

2007-01-07T20:48:46Z

signing

Strangelv at 03:16, 6 January 2007

2007-01-06T03:16:03Z

Cfrjlr at 02:45, 6 January 2007

2007-01-06T02:45:51Z

Cfrjlr at 02:41, 6 January 2007

2007-01-06T02:41:54Z

Jarogers2001: wow

2007-01-05T03:03:59Z

wow

New page

The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:56, 20 January 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Let me check those lists right quick [[User:Cfrjlr\|Charles F. Radley]] 07:36, 20 January 2007 (PST)		Let me check those lists right quick [[User:Cfrjlr\|Charles F. Radley]] 07:36, 20 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	Yes we are good to go, they are all covered. Please redirect asap. Thanks. [[User:Cfrjlr\|Charles F. Radley]] 07:56, 20 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 20 January 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 06:53, 20 January 2007 (PST)		--[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 06:53, 20 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	Let me check those lists right quick [[User:Cfrjlr\|Charles F. Radley]] 07:36, 20 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 20 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this. Create a list of those too? --[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST)		:Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this. Create a list of those too? --[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	==Transition==
		+	Is there anything left for the transition or is it now safe to turn this page into a redirect?
		+
		+	--[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 06:53, 20 January 2007 (PST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)
-:Indeed.  The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development.  There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but  I guess we are not interested in ancient hsitory  :-)  (unsigned by Cfrjlr)
+:Indeed.  The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development.  There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but  I guess we are not interested in ancient history :-)
 :Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this.  Create a list of those too? --[[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)
-<P>
-Indeed.  The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development.  There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but  I guess we are not interested in ancient hsitory  :-)
+:Indeed.  The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development.  There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but  I guess we are not interested in ancient hsitory  :-)  (unsigned by Cfrjlr)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 6 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)		The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)
		+	<P>
		+	Indeed. The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, but only the tip of the iceberg....