Talk:List of Component Vendors - Revision history

Jarogers2001 at 05:37, 8 January 2007

2007-01-08T05:37:02Z

Strangelv at 05:14, 8 January 2007

2007-01-08T05:14:39Z

Jarogers2001 at 02:39, 8 January 2007

2007-01-08T02:39:31Z

Strangelv at 21:00, 7 January 2007

2007-01-07T21:00:23Z

Cfrjlr: definition of component versus system

2007-01-07T20:45:25Z

definition of component versus system

Jarogers2001 at 06:02, 3 January 2007

2007-01-03T06:02:24Z

Jarogers2001 at 06:00, 3 January 2007

2007-01-03T06:00:13Z

Cfrjlr: component defintiion ?

2007-01-03T02:31:21Z

component defintiion ?

Strangelv at 19:44, 2 January 2007

2007-01-02T19:44:24Z

New page

Do all of these vendors sell components, or do some not belong here. Also, what vendors here belong on other, as yet uncreated lists, such as launch system vendors?

--[[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 11:44, 2 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 8 January 2007
Line 54:		Line 54:

	:::Create one or more new lists to move them to, such as [[List of Space Station and Module Companies]]? We probably also need a parallel category development to make these things easy to find after we'v created at least the stubs. -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 21:14, 7 January 2007 (PST)		:::Create one or more new lists to move them to, such as [[List of Space Station and Module Companies]]? We probably also need a parallel category development to make these things easy to find after we'v created at least the stubs. -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 21:14, 7 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	::::Sounds good to me. [[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 21:37, 7 January 2007 (PST)

@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 :When I created the link to this list I was thinking of thrusters, engines, processors, control systems and the like ([[Micro Aerospace Solutions]] being a perfect example), not complete off-the-shelf solutions.  Should we split this list up or at least subdivide it?  -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 13:00, 7 January 2007 (PST)
-I was thinking of "components" in the context of off the shelf hardware for a manned or unmanned lunar mission.  Links for module and launch companies have now been made.  Should I remove all of my additions that do not deal purely in individual pieces?  How would you like to divide the list?
+::I was thinking of "components" in the context of off the shelf hardware for a manned or unmanned lunar mission.  Links for module and launch companies have now been made.  Should I remove all of my additions that do not deal purely in individual pieces?  How would you like to divide the list?
-[[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 18:39, 7 January 2007 (PST)
+::[[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 18:39, 7 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 8 January 2007
Line 48:		Line 48:

	:When I created the link to this list I was thinking of thrusters, engines, processors, control systems and the like ([[Micro Aerospace Solutions]] being a perfect example), not complete off-the-shelf solutions. Should we split this list up or at least subdivide it? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 13:00, 7 January 2007 (PST)		:When I created the link to this list I was thinking of thrusters, engines, processors, control systems and the like ([[Micro Aerospace Solutions]] being a perfect example), not complete off-the-shelf solutions. Should we split this list up or at least subdivide it? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 13:00, 7 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	I was thinking of "components" in the context of off the shelf hardware for a manned or unmanned lunar mission. Links for module and launch companies have now been made. Should I remove all of my additions that do not deal purely in individual pieces? How would you like to divide the list?
		+
		+	[[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 18:39, 7 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 7 January 2007
Line 46:		Line 46:

	[[User:Cfrjlr\|Charles F. Radley]] 12:45, 7 January 2007 (PST)		[[User:Cfrjlr\|Charles F. Radley]] 12:45, 7 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	:When I created the link to this list I was thinking of thrusters, engines, processors, control systems and the like ([[Micro Aerospace Solutions]] being a perfect example), not complete off-the-shelf solutions. Should we split this list up or at least subdivide it? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 13:00, 7 January 2007 (PST)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Most of the vendors listed I would describe as systems vendors, rather than component vendors.
 ---------------
@@ Line 31: / Line 33: @@
 [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 22:00, 2 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 3 January 2007
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Many of the companies listed are also system vendors.		Many of the companies listed are also system vendors.
		+
		+	I have not looked at Microspace. It was already on the list.

	[[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 22:00, 2 January 2007 (PST)		[[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 22:00, 2 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:00, 3 January 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Most of the vendors listed I would describe as systems vendors, rather than component vendors.		Most of the vendors listed I would describe as systems vendors, rather than component vendors.
		+
		+	---------------
		+
		+	Please clarify.
		+
		+
		+	To my knowledge, all listed are aerospace component and sub-system vendors or provide these services on a contract basis except:
		+
		+	1. SpaceX. This company has not yet completed their planned "Dragon Capsule" which is planned to be launchable on their own Falcon 9 and ULA Delta 5 rockets. The Delta 5s are undergoing a study to determine the cost to man rate this rocket. SpaceX is also a launch system vendor.
		+
		+	2. Armadillo Aerospace. Not currently offering any components. This company was the only participant in the 2006 Xprize Cup's Lunar Lander Challenge. The lander launched successfully and reached the target but suffered the collapse of a leg upon landing. Lander was unable to complete the return trip.
		+
		+	3. Bigelow Aerospace. Currently producing prototype inflatable modules for use in space habitats and research stations. Modules are in testing and are not yet being manufactured for sale.
		+
		+	4. LiftPort group includes companies researching and producing carbon nano-tubes for research and experimentation. End goal of company is to develop technologies to enable the construction of "space elevators"
		+
		+	5. Masten Space Systems. Launch systems under development as of this date. quote - "XA-1.0 will take a 100kg payload to over 100km altitude on a sub-orbital trajectory several times in a single day. It is part of a line of spacecraft that will eventually achieve orbit and provide cislunar transportation services." On closer inspection, this company is a launch system provider and should be moved.
		+
		+	6. Rocketplane Kistler. K1 module still in development. Module is a stand alone launch system. Company should be moved.
		+
		+	Many of the companies listed are also system vendors.
		+
		+	[[User:Jarogers2001\|Jarogers2001]] 22:00, 2 January 2007 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:31, 3 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	--[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 11:44, 2 January 2007 (PST)		--[[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 11:44, 2 January 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	That depends on our definition of components versus systems or whatever.
		+
		+	Most of the vendors listed I would describe as systems vendors, rather than component vendors.