Talk:Selene Alliance - Revision history

Mdelaney: /* Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia */

2011-03-26T18:12:16Z

Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia

Mdelaney: /* Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia */

2011-03-26T18:10:34Z

Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia

Mdelaney: /* Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia */

2011-03-26T18:03:54Z

Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia

Jotagiraldez at 22:11, 25 February 2011

2011-02-25T22:11:32Z

Jotagiraldez at 20:30, 12 January 2011

2011-01-12T20:30:10Z

Jotagiraldez at 20:29, 12 January 2011

2011-01-12T20:29:34Z

69.207.61.157: /* Proposed plausible deniability policy */

2010-12-29T01:19:27Z

Proposed plausible deniability policy

Mdelaney: /* Proposed plausible deniability policy */

2010-07-13T03:22:35Z

Proposed plausible deniability policy

Mdelaney: /* Proposed plausible deniability policy */ new section

2010-07-13T03:21:28Z

Proposed plausible deniability policy: new section

Strangelv: tweak

2010-07-13T02:39:29Z

tweak

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:12, 26 March 2011
Line 41:		Line 41:
	:Well we've moved it now. But the original intention was to attract members from within a game a bunch of us play, something at which the article has failed miserably. Please note that this website is part of [http://www.moonsociety.org The Moon Society] and as such part of it's mandate is to attract members, but I think that was the only article of this nature. As far as moving it to scientifiction.org, no, it doesn't belong there either. I was never really in favour of placing it on Lunarpedia but it was a fait-accomplis before I knew what was going on. Anyway we've now moved it to the very restricted free wiki hosting provided by wikia.com at http://ikmoon.wikia.com/wiki/Ikariam_Selene_Alliance_Wiki		:Well we've moved it now. But the original intention was to attract members from within a game a bunch of us play, something at which the article has failed miserably. Please note that this website is part of [http://www.moonsociety.org The Moon Society] and as such part of it's mandate is to attract members, but I think that was the only article of this nature. As far as moving it to scientifiction.org, no, it doesn't belong there either. I was never really in favour of placing it on Lunarpedia but it was a fait-accomplis before I knew what was going on. Anyway we've now moved it to the very restricted free wiki hosting provided by wikia.com at http://ikmoon.wikia.com/wiki/Ikariam_Selene_Alliance_Wiki
	:--[[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 18:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)		:--[[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 18:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Perhaps I should rephrase that. We're in the process of moving it now. New page setup already.
		+	::--[[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 18:12, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 This article shouldn't be in Lunarpedia!!!!!!--[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jose Giraldez]] 22:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
-:Well we've moved it now. But the original intention was to attract members from within a game a bunch of us play, something at which the article has failed miserably. Please note that this website is part of The Moon Society and as such part of it's mandate is to attract members, but I think that was the only article of this nature. As far as moving it to scientifiction.org, no, it doesn't belong there either. I was never really in favour of placing it on Lunarpedia but it was a fait-accomplis before I knew what was going on. Anyway we've now moved it to the very restricted free wiki hosting provided by wikia.com at http://ikmoon.wikia.com/wiki/Ikariam_Selene_Alliance_Wiki
+:Well we've moved it now. But the original intention was to attract members from within a game a bunch of us play, something at which the article has failed miserably. Please note that this website is part of [http://www.moonsociety.org The Moon Society] and as such part of it's mandate is to attract members, but I think that was the only article of this nature. As far as moving it to scientifiction.org, no, it doesn't belong there either. I was never really in favour of placing it on Lunarpedia but it was a fait-accomplis before I knew what was going on. Anyway we've now moved it to the very restricted free wiki hosting provided by wikia.com at http://ikmoon.wikia.com/wiki/Ikariam_Selene_Alliance_Wiki
 :--[[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 18:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 26 March 2011
Line 38:		Line 38:

	This article shouldn't be in Lunarpedia!!!!!!--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 22:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)		This article shouldn't be in Lunarpedia!!!!!!--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 22:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	:Well we've moved it now. But the original intention was to attract members from within a game a bunch of us play, something at which the article has failed miserably. Please note that this website is part of The Moon Society and as such part of it's mandate is to attract members, but I think that was the only article of this nature. As far as moving it to scientifiction.org, no, it doesn't belong there either. I was never really in favour of placing it on Lunarpedia but it was a fait-accomplis before I knew what was going on. Anyway we've now moved it to the very restricted free wiki hosting provided by wikia.com at http://ikmoon.wikia.com/wiki/Ikariam_Selene_Alliance_Wiki
		+	:--[[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 18:03, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 25 February 2011
Line 35:		Line 35:
	==Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia==		==Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia==

−	The article does present any encyclopedic topic/category/knowledge... I propose to move it to scientifiction.--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 20:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)	+	The article does present any encyclopedic topic/category/knowledge... I propose to move it to scientifiction.org --[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 20:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
		+
		+	This article shouldn't be in Lunarpedia!!!!!!--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 22:11, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 12 January 2011
Line 35:		Line 35:
	==Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia==		==Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia==

−	The article does present any encyclopedic topic/category/knowledge... I propose to move it to scientifiction.	+	The article does present any encyclopedic topic/category/knowledge... I propose to move it to scientifiction.--[[User:Jotagiraldez\|Jose Giraldez]] 20:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 12 January 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	==Idea to get gold to new players==		==Idea to get gold to new players==
	Give them a couple ships of wood to sell back to us at 99 gold each. This will give them money to buy their own ships instead of having us drag stuff to them.		Give them a couple ships of wood to sell back to us at 99 gold each. This will give them money to buy their own ships instead of having us drag stuff to them.
		+
		+	==Re-defining purpose of Lunarpedia==
		+
		+	The article does present any encyclopedic topic/category/knowledge... I propose to move it to scientifiction.

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 29 December 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	-- [[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 03:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)		-- [[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 03:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Idea to get gold to new players==
		+	Give them a couple ships of wood to sell back to us at 99 gold each. This will give them money to buy their own ships instead of having us drag stuff to them.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 13 July 2010
Line 27:		Line 27:

	In the event of a wider conflict between other alliances, it may sometimes be prudent overlook occupation of some of our towns as this allows plausible deniability of involvement in the conflict while still aiding our friends. This policy should be unofficial and only implemented during official wars. We should be informed of any such proposed occupation beforehand in the interests of saving our troops. This is a very gray area that needs to be discussed, and if adopted, remain unpublished.		In the event of a wider conflict between other alliances, it may sometimes be prudent overlook occupation of some of our towns as this allows plausible deniability of involvement in the conflict while still aiding our friends. This policy should be unofficial and only implemented during official wars. We should be informed of any such proposed occupation beforehand in the interests of saving our troops. This is a very gray area that needs to be discussed, and if adopted, remain unpublished.
		+
		+	-- [[User:Mdelaney\|Mdelaney]] 03:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 13 July 2010
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Still pondering this phraseology. I actually liked the first iteration in ASI MOO better. Its bluntness gave it needed clarity.		:Still pondering this phraseology. I actually liked the first iteration in ASI MOO better. Its bluntness gave it needed clarity.
	:For reference, unless I've been given advance notice to not do so, I will jump in on any occupation, blockade, or other seemingly hostile action for neighboring (and in some cases not so neighboring) allied players, especially smaller, poorly defended ones who are actively building up. If crushing the occupiers or cutting off their escape route from someplace else they're attacking is something you don't want me doing, <FONT style="font-variant:small-caps">tell me in advance.</FONT> -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)		:For reference, unless I've been given advance notice to not do so, I will jump in on any occupation, blockade, or other seemingly hostile action for neighboring (and in some cases not so neighboring) allied players, especially smaller, poorly defended ones who are actively building up. If crushing the occupiers or cutting off their escape route from someplace else they're attacking is something you don't want me doing, <FONT style="font-variant:small-caps">tell me in advance.</FONT> -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Proposed plausible deniability policy ==
		+
		+	In the event of a wider conflict between other alliances, it may sometimes be prudent overlook occupation of some of our towns as this allows plausible deniability of involvement in the conflict while still aiding our friends. This policy should be unofficial and only implemented during official wars. We should be informed of any such proposed occupation beforehand in the interests of saving our troops. This is a very gray area that needs to be discussed, and if adopted, remain unpublished.

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 :Seems reasonable to me also. [[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 02:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
-:Still pondering this phraseology.  I actually liked the first iteration in ASI MOO better.  It's bluntness gave it needed clarity.
+:Still pondering this phraseology.  I actually liked the first iteration in ASI MOO better.  Its bluntness gave it needed clarity.
-:For reference, unless I've been given advance notice to not do so, I will jump in on any occupation, blockade, or other seemingly hostile action for neighboring allied players, especially smaller, poorly defended ones who are actively building up.  If crushing the occupiers or cutting off their escape route from someplace else they're attacking is something you don't want me doing, <FONT style="font-variant:small-caps">tell me in advance.</FONT> -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 02:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
+:For reference, unless I've been given advance notice to not do so, I will jump in on any occupation, blockade, or other seemingly hostile action for neighboring (and in some cases not so neighboring) allied players, especially smaller, poorly defended ones who are actively building up.  If crushing the occupiers or cutting off their escape route from someplace else they're attacking is something you don't want me doing, <FONT style="font-variant:small-caps">tell me in advance.</FONT> -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 02:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)