Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Lunar Transverse Maps"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Opertunity knocks)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
--[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 13:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 13:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
== Thermo and other spacecraft ==
 +
 +
Dear Peter,
 +
 +
Spacecraft must get rid of internal heat to keep their
 +
electronics from overheating.  This is done with a radiator that
 +
rejects the heat to deep space.
 +
 +
It is very easy to design a free flying spacecraft to point
 +
its solar panels at the sun and its radiator in the anti-sun
 +
direction.  This works very well.
 +
 +
On the Moon you cannot do this.  The surface of the Moon
 +
blocks more than 1/2 the view of the radiator and it is difficult to
 +
keep the effects of the sun completely off it.  The result is like
 +
having your rover in a giant frying pan at the temperature of the
 +
local surface.
 +
 +
The Russian Lunapods did last about a month.  They weighted
 +
about a ton, were the size of a Volkswagen Beetle, and had both solar
 +
and nuclear power.  This is not a good comparison.
 +
 +
The Apollo rover is better.  The radiator was at the back
 +
where a trunk lid would be.  The astronauts arrived mid-morning when the weather was good and left three days later before it got too hot.  They would have cooked to death a day or too later if they had stayed. Just as the rovers did.
 +
 +
The Apollo rover electronics had a tendency to over heat.  The
 +
problem was mostly dust covering the radiator, but they also
 +
overheated if used near a sunlit mountain side.
 +
 +
The astronauts did leave some scientific instruments that ran
 +
for quite a while.  Again this is a poor comparison.  The  instruments
 +
were simple and designed to be very heat resistant.  They were also
 +
nuclear powered.
 +
 +
The electronics box will be covered with MLI (Multi-layered
 +
Insulation) except for the radiator.  This is up to 12 layers of
 +
aluminized plastic with space between. It is great insulation but
 +
insulation will only do so much.  If the radiator is not very
 +
effective the entire electronics box will simply reach the ambient
 +
temperature of the surrounding in a few tens of hours.
 +
 +
The two ideas suggested in my paper are 1) move away from the
 +
equator until the peak daytime temperature does not kill your
 +
electronics, or 2) bury in the regolith until the day/night
 +
temperature extremes are averaged out.  Both approaches have serious
 +
problems.
 +
 +
I can provide a spreadsheet that I used to estimate the
 +
latitude of the northern and southern roads, but it does not have much
 +
text with it.  I am not qualified to do a realistic thermodynamic
 +
study of the proposed rovers.  It is not my field and I have not been
 +
able to get any volunteers to do it.  This work would take about 100
 +
hours and a fairly large desktop computer with the correct
 +
professional software.
 +
 +
Thanks for the discussion.
 +
 +
--[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 22:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 14:44, 31 March 2008

The new lunar data looks like a once-in-a-lifetime oppertunity to get large number of students directly involved in lunar exploration.

--Jriley 13:15, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Thermo and other spacecraft

Dear Peter,

Spacecraft must get rid of internal heat to keep their electronics from overheating. This is done with a radiator that rejects the heat to deep space.

It is very easy to design a free flying spacecraft to point its solar panels at the sun and its radiator in the anti-sun direction. This works very well.

On the Moon you cannot do this. The surface of the Moon blocks more than 1/2 the view of the radiator and it is difficult to keep the effects of the sun completely off it. The result is like having your rover in a giant frying pan at the temperature of the local surface.

The Russian Lunapods did last about a month. They weighted about a ton, were the size of a Volkswagen Beetle, and had both solar and nuclear power. This is not a good comparison.

The Apollo rover is better. The radiator was at the back where a trunk lid would be. The astronauts arrived mid-morning when the weather was good and left three days later before it got too hot. They would have cooked to death a day or too later if they had stayed. Just as the rovers did.

The Apollo rover electronics had a tendency to over heat. The problem was mostly dust covering the radiator, but they also overheated if used near a sunlit mountain side.

The astronauts did leave some scientific instruments that ran for quite a while. Again this is a poor comparison. The instruments were simple and designed to be very heat resistant. They were also nuclear powered.

The electronics box will be covered with MLI (Multi-layered Insulation) except for the radiator. This is up to 12 layers of aluminized plastic with space between. It is great insulation but insulation will only do so much. If the radiator is not very effective the entire electronics box will simply reach the ambient temperature of the surrounding in a few tens of hours.

The two ideas suggested in my paper are 1) move away from the equator until the peak daytime temperature does not kill your electronics, or 2) bury in the regolith until the day/night temperature extremes are averaged out. Both approaches have serious problems.

I can provide a spreadsheet that I used to estimate the latitude of the northern and southern roads, but it does not have much text with it. I am not qualified to do a realistic thermodynamic study of the proposed rovers. It is not my field and I have not been able to get any volunteers to do it. This work would take about 100 hours and a fairly large desktop computer with the correct professional software.

Thanks for the discussion.

--Jriley 22:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:The_Lunar_Transverse_Maps&oldid=11883"