Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Boosters"
(signing) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST) | The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| − | :Indeed. The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development. There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but I guess we are not interested in ancient | + | :Indeed. The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development. There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but I guess we are not interested in ancient history :-) |
| + | [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 12:48, 7 January 2007 (PST) | ||
:Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this. Create a list of those too? --[[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST) | :Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this. Create a list of those too? --[[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 12:48, 7 January 2007
The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? Jarogers2001 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)
- Indeed. The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development. There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but I guess we are not interested in ancient history :-)
Charles F. Radley 12:48, 7 January 2007 (PST)
- Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this. Create a list of those too? --Strangelv 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST)
