Difference between revisions of "Home"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 82: Line 82:
  
 
==Software Capabilities==
 
==Software Capabilities==
 +
 +
Lunarpedia uses the latest stable version of Mediawiki, so in many respects it is very similar to Wikipedia. At the time of writing this, we were running version 1.9.3 while 1.10 was the unreleased development version.
 +
 +
 +
===Installed Extensions we admit to===
 +
 +
*CategoryTree
 +
*Cite
 +
*ImageMap
 +
*MathStatFunctions
 +
*ParserFunctions
 +
*SpamBlacklist - Should we admit to having this or will that only encourage the idots to waste their time and sometimes ours
 +
*Spellcheck
 +
*articletocategory
 +
*create
 +
*inputbox
  
 
We recently added the footnote capability to Lunarpedia, so that is now the same.   
 
We recently added the footnote capability to Lunarpedia, so that is now the same.   
 +
  
 
Other differences:   
 
Other differences:   
Line 90: Line 107:
 
* Wikipedia reflist template is not available i.e. {{reflist}}
 
* Wikipedia reflist template is not available i.e. {{reflist}}
 
* the Wikipedia [citation needed] template is not available:  {{Fact|date=March 2007}}.
 
* the Wikipedia [citation needed] template is not available:  {{Fact|date=March 2007}}.
 +
 +
 +
Extensions in the pipeline (maybe):
 +
 +
*Graphviz
 +
*TeX Editor (This is really nice but we had to disable it as there seemed to be a security issue with it)
 +
*WikiTeX (Will take quite some time to install, has a plethora of dependancies)

Revision as of 02:52, 12 March 2007

NOTICE: All articles in the main namespace are released to the Public Domain and may be used for any purpose without entangling restrictions. DO NOT add any content to these pages that you do not wish to release to the public domain and/or lack the authority to release to the public domain!
Articles controlled by the GNU FDL should be imported with full revision histories to the GFDL: namespace. For example, the [[Crater chain]] article from Wikipedia would need to be implemented as [[GFDL:Crater chain]] here. A tutorial is now available.
Articles meant to require attribution to Lunarpedia.org under the terms of Creative Commons must be placed in the CC_Lunar: namespace (for example, [[CC Lunar:Crater chain]]

Welcome to Lunarpedia!

Lunarpedia's mission is to cover everything we will need to know how to do on Luna to set up colonies, as well as related efforts, designs, and business models that may eventually lead there. Construction is underway and you can help!


New Users Start Here!

  • Click here to create your account -- or else donate your content anonymously.
  • You can click on your user name and create a page to tell us about yourself.
  • If you have questions or comments about any page then click on the "discussion" tab and type in the edit box. Make sure to sign the text with a row of four tilda (~) characters


Categories of interest:

You Can Help!

  • Find an identified needed article with a red link, click here for a list of missing but linked to articles, or create your article by typing in the topic name in the URL (such as http://www.lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=articlename.)
  • Refine an article stub into something more complete.
  • Or simply tidy up an article in this category.
  • An offsite guide to Wiki formatting can be found Here.
  • Our List of Lists contains links to lists of needed articles and needed lists of such articles.

Differences versus Wikipedia

There are several differences between Lunarpedia and Wikipedia in both policy and Wiki software capability.

Lunarpedia Policies

Original Work is Allowed

We are more open to material types than Wikipedia, and less interested in deleting material. Specifically, Wikipedia enforces a rule that all entries must NOT be "original work". That rule does not apply for Lunarpedia, we are very happy for you to post original work, provided it is not copyright. Therefore there is not so much duplication between Lunarpedia and Wikipedia as you might expect. For example, the Lunarpedia page on Solar Power Satellites contains interesting material which under Wikipedia rules would be deleted because it is "original work".

Note: Once "original work" has been published on Lunarpedia, then anybody could put on Wikipedia a link to the Lunarpedia article, and that might be OK for Wikipedia as it would no longer be original work, and references are usually accepted over there. For those cases where you want to reference it elsewhere, we could arrange for it to become read-only protected.

No Need to be Notable

Wikipedia enforces a requirement that all articles about people or organizations must demonstrate why the subject is "notable". There is no such requirement on Lunarpedia, although there is a general expectation that it should somehow be related to Lunar Development.

No Need to be Neutral

You can advocate positions, but expect to be challenged. Conversely, do not just delete material you do not agree with, but feel free to add a rebuttal.

Advertising is OK

It is perfectly fine to highlight products or services, including both your own and those of other persons or companies. Just make sure it is relevant.

Software Capabilities

Lunarpedia uses the latest stable version of Mediawiki, so in many respects it is very similar to Wikipedia. At the time of writing this, we were running version 1.9.3 while 1.10 was the unreleased development version.


Installed Extensions we admit to

  • CategoryTree
  • Cite
  • ImageMap
  • MathStatFunctions
  • ParserFunctions
  • SpamBlacklist - Should we admit to having this or will that only encourage the idots to waste their time and sometimes ours
  • Spellcheck
  • articletocategory
  • create
  • inputbox

We recently added the footnote capability to Lunarpedia, so that is now the same.


Other differences:

  • Wikipedia has some cool citation templates which we might add
  • Wikipedia reflist template is not available i.e. Template:Reflist
  • the Wikipedia [citation needed] template is not available: [citation needed]{{#if:||}}.


Extensions in the pipeline (maybe):

  • Graphviz
  • TeX Editor (This is really nice but we had to disable it as there seemed to be a security issue with it)
  • WikiTeX (Will take quite some time to install, has a plethora of dependancies)