|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {{Sdc}}Miros is the double curly bracket goddess!{{Edc}} [[User:Miros1|Rose/Miros]] 22:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC) | | {{Sdc}}Miros is the double curly bracket goddess!{{Edc}} [[User:Miros1|Rose/Miros]] 22:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC) |
| | | | |
| − | Instead of removing pages and recreating them with a different name, you should use the "move" link at the top of the page. This creates a redirect and prevents broken links. It also prevents you from jacking my personal cheat sheets when I'm not looking and putting them somewhere that I can't find them! Women.... - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 20:36, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
| + | (Unnecessary stuff about hijacked personal pages and Mediawiki imports removed) |
| − | :Yeah, you left a redirect but by the time I noticed I'd already finished yanking your leg. :D - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 01:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | FYI. The bio link on your user page leads to an article which redirects back to your user page. - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 07:50, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :Yeah, that's to entertain people while they read my User page. [[User:Miros1|Rose/Miros]] 22:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Were all of those templates imported from Wikipedia? - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 05:32, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | :I was just wondering where they all came from. Will they conflict with the GNU/Creative commons license sine we are public domain? - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 20:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
| |
| − | ::Most of them are going bye-bye. We're going with a different solution for broken links to the MediaWiki help (like sending people to MediaWiki).
| |
| | | | |
| | == The spelling of aluminium == | | == The spelling of aluminium == |
| − | Hello Rosalie:
| + | (It's effing aluminum, and for future reference, we are using US usages.) |
| − | A new user, Jotagiraldez, is apparently very productive and talented. One thing he changed that I would disagree with is the spelling of aluminum being changed to aluminium, the British variant that my spell checker flags as an error. I give an argument for the old spelling on the [[Talk:Aluminium]] page if you care to look. I would like to notify as many people as might care about this.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 16:38, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
| + | |
| | + | ==A questionable file== |
| | + | (Farrad removed the file) |
| | | | |
| | + | ==Marspedia== |
| | | | |
| − | == Internationality == | + | (referred to JamesB) |
| − | | + | |
| − | Lunarpedia is in the WWW. WORLD... WIDE... WEB Just realize that this wiki has to be an international thing.
| + | ==Question answered== |
| − | | + | Hello Miros, I answered your question on ((Talk:New moon base concepts)). |
| − | In the international English, Is better Aluminium over Aluminum.
| + | |
| − | | + | [[User:Farred|Farred]] ([[User talk:Farred|talk]]) 21:43, 22 March 2019 (GMT) |
| − | wikipedia says:
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | : Most countries use the spelling ''aluminium'' (with an ''i'' before -''um''). In the United States, this spelling is largely unknown, and the spelling ''aluminum'' predominates.<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium#cite_note-56 [57]]</sup><sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium#cite_note-57 [58]]</sup> The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Oxford_Dictionary Canadian Oxford Dictionary] prefers ''aluminum'', whereas the Australian [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macquarie_Dictionary Macquarie Dictionary] prefers ''aluminium''.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | : The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Union_of_Pure_and_Applied_Chemistry International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry] (IUPAC) adopted ''aluminium'' as the standard international name for the element in 1990, but three years later recognized ''aluminum'' as an acceptable variant. Hence their periodic table includes both.<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium#cite_note-58 [59]]</sup> IUPAC prefers the use of ''aluminium'' in its internal publications, although nearly as many IUPAC publications use the spelling ''aluminum''.<sup>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium#cite_note-59 [60]]</sup>
| |
| − | | |
| − | Personally, I think this effort can help our brothers in India and China in reach the moon again. Americans wont go the moon again or return before them (this is my personal opinion and I can be wrong). Therefore it is URGENT to summarize the knowledge we have.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Now, just saying that English is a barrier, many serious guys I know do wont ever use lunarpedia just because they do not know how to write and read in english...Now imagine that once you know how to do it, everything doesn't follow international patterns methods and spelling...
| |
| − | | |
| − | Be international!!!Lunarpedia doesn't have to be an international thing!!!
| |
| | | | |
| − | But if you change everything to aluminum I wont change it again to aluminium....--[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jotagiraldez]] 17:55, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
| + | Thanks [[User:Miros1|Rose/Miros]] ([[User talk:Miros1|talk]]) 20:04, 12 April 2019 (BST) |
{{Miros is the double curly bracket goddess!}}
Rose/Miros 22:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
(Unnecessary stuff about hijacked personal pages and Mediawiki imports removed)
The spelling of aluminium
(It's effing aluminum, and for future reference, we are using US usages.)
A questionable file
(Farrad removed the file)
Marspedia
(referred to JamesB)
Question answered
Hello Miros, I answered your question on ((Talk:New moon base concepts)).
Farred (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2019 (GMT)
Thanks Rose/Miros (talk) 20:04, 12 April 2019 (BST)
