Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cfrjlr"
(Actually, you'd already started for its weakness) |
(communications entries) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:Actually, you had already caught on to a weakness of this attacker. By going for a saturation attack it's actually attacking more than once from some nodes. So blocking the IPs its using should actually have an impact... it has a relatively small number of zombies at its disposal -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 14:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | :Actually, you had already caught on to a weakness of this attacker. By going for a saturation attack it's actually attacking more than once from some nodes. So blocking the IPs its using should actually have an impact... it has a relatively small number of zombies at its disposal -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 14:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == communications entries == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have no problem combining the two communication entries. | ||
| + | |||
| + | My purpose was to purpose the use of optical communications for lunar commercial operations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Do you want to do it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 11:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
Revision as of 03:47, 28 September 2007
If you change the other element articles besides helium after this point, be sure to let me know on my user talk page so i can back them up before JamesG runs autostub. I'll make a place to list them. Jarogers2001 15:04, 6 February 2007 (PST)
- I already have the watch feature on those articles, however I may miss some edits as I never know when or for how long I will be able work in lunarpedia due to my schedule. It was meant as a contingency. 67.63.172.166 09:15, 7 February 2007 (PST)
On Category:Mining and Category:ISRU both are subcategories of each other. Mike is afraid that if someone exploits this and expands the subcategory screen past 200 it will cause horrible burning death. Jarogers2001 12:07, 18 March 2007 (PDT)
Anonymous Attacks
There's another option, one that's less bad than prohibiting anonymous contributions: set up capchas for anonymous edits, not just account creation. So far none of our attackers are ones who are using workarounds for them.
-- Strangelv 14:05, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, you had already caught on to a weakness of this attacker. By going for a saturation attack it's actually attacking more than once from some nodes. So blocking the IPs its using should actually have an impact... it has a relatively small number of zombies at its disposal -- Strangelv 14:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
communications entries
I have no problem combining the two communication entries.
My purpose was to purpose the use of optical communications for lunar commercial operations.
Do you want to do it?
--Jriley 11:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
