Difference between revisions of "User talk:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:I could say about the same for USER:ClydedwvhekqvehxdlpriyazlhirmglstdenxbazSaro, but I have already deleted the article as off topic.  I do not know if it justifies a block, but I doubt the block would be necessary because this sort of user is usually an account used only once.  - [[User:Farred|Farred]] 19:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 
:I could say about the same for USER:ClydedwvhekqvehxdlpriyazlhirmglstdenxbazSaro, but I have already deleted the article as off topic.  I do not know if it justifies a block, but I doubt the block would be necessary because this sort of user is usually an account used only once.  - [[User:Farred|Farred]] 19:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
  
Yes, Spam!
+
==Yes, Spam!==
It is advertisment for a Usenet forums. Please delete these 3 contributions.
+
It is advertisment for a Usenet forums. Please delete these 3 contributions.--[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jose Giraldez]] 23:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:06, 2 June 2012

Is it spam?

I consider the contributions of user:EddyoucylleqjkvjsedlgedsfpudnddndcydppzGrboyan to be spam but I wanted to check with others before deleting them as such. Instructions in how to get to USENET might be suitable content but the advertisement of the particular provider does not seem to me to be what we should accept. If I get no response on this in a couple of days I will block the user and delete the contributions. - Farred 19:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I could say about the same for USER:ClydedwvhekqvehxdlpriyazlhirmglstdenxbazSaro, but I have already deleted the article as off topic. I do not know if it justifies a block, but I doubt the block would be necessary because this sort of user is usually an account used only once. - Farred 19:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes, Spam!

It is advertisment for a Usenet forums. Please delete these 3 contributions.--Jose Giraldez 23:06, 2 June 2012 (UTC)