Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Element"
Jarogers2001 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Maybe some variant of [http://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAllpages&from=&namespace=10 this] to view the templates in lieu of a category? I'm not sure how to make that a wikilink, though. -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 05:14, 26 January 2007 (PST) | :Maybe some variant of [http://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Special%3AAllpages&from=&namespace=10 this] to view the templates in lieu of a category? I'm not sure how to make that a wikilink, though. -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 05:14, 26 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Is there a way to put the link on [http://lunarpedia.org/index.php?title=Special:Specialpages Special Pages]? -- [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 05:34, 26 January 2007 (PST) | ||
==aprior, bnext== | ==aprior, bnext== | ||
I can support these without adding more columns of data than I already have. I've added isotopes to what I have in the autostub2 page (or is it talk page), but I'm not sure where to hraw the line or how to describe all isotopes with a half-life of 24 hours or better, which is what I presently have jotted down. Is there a list of all natural isotopes somewhere? -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 05:20, 26 January 2007 (PST) | I can support these without adding more columns of data than I already have. I've added isotopes to what I have in the autostub2 page (or is it talk page), but I'm not sure where to hraw the line or how to describe all isotopes with a half-life of 24 hours or better, which is what I presently have jotted down. Is there a list of all natural isotopes somewhere? -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 05:20, 26 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope_table_%28complete%29 Isotope Table (complete)] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope_table_%28divided%29 Isotope Table (divided)] | ||
| + | : The problem with Natural Isotopes is that isotopes produced from radioactive decay get classified as synthetic. You might be better off leaving the isotope section blank, as that would be better defined in the article itself along with atomic mass and half life of individual isotopes. Dont worry about the bprior bnext. They can be added later. -- [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 05:34, 26 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 05:34, 26 January 2007
For some reason categories used on a template are being conferred upon pages that use that template. Any solutions? -- Jarogers2001 04:40, 26 January 2007 (PST)
- Not that I know of. Strangelv looks at Wikipedia for an example. Maybe we should be trying to use <includeonly> to at least keep the templates out of the categories they're tagging articles with... --Strangelv 05:10, 26 January 2007 (PST)
- Maybe some variant of this to view the templates in lieu of a category? I'm not sure how to make that a wikilink, though. -- Strangelv 05:14, 26 January 2007 (PST)
- Is there a way to put the link on Special Pages? -- Jarogers2001 05:34, 26 January 2007 (PST)
aprior, bnext
I can support these without adding more columns of data than I already have. I've added isotopes to what I have in the autostub2 page (or is it talk page), but I'm not sure where to hraw the line or how to describe all isotopes with a half-life of 24 hours or better, which is what I presently have jotted down. Is there a list of all natural isotopes somewhere? -- Strangelv 05:20, 26 January 2007 (PST)
- Isotope Table (complete) and Isotope Table (divided)
- The problem with Natural Isotopes is that isotopes produced from radioactive decay get classified as synthetic. You might be better off leaving the isotope section blank, as that would be better defined in the article itself along with atomic mass and half life of individual isotopes. Dont worry about the bprior bnext. They can be added later. -- Jarogers2001 05:34, 26 January 2007 (PST)
