Difference between revisions of "Talk:Railroads"
(we need to figure out how to organize this article better) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This statement is questionable: "The cost of building such a structure compared to earth is greatly reduced due to the 1/6 [[Gravity]]" | This statement is questionable: "The cost of building such a structure compared to earth is greatly reduced due to the 1/6 [[Gravity]]" | ||
Building infrastructure on the Moon will be extremely expensive compared to Earth. 1/6 gravity helps a little, but does not make it cheaper than Earth. Please reword this sentence. thanks.[[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 14:14, 10 March 2007 (PST) | Building infrastructure on the Moon will be extremely expensive compared to Earth. 1/6 gravity helps a little, but does not make it cheaper than Earth. Please reword this sentence. thanks.[[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 14:14, 10 March 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Restructure of Bulk/cargo/passenger and addition of new section=== | ||
| + | I've tried to restructure the proposed progression from bulk to passenger and add a section on types, but I still find the organizational structure of this article to be unsatisfactory. -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 08:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 21 September 2007
Just thought you might be interested
http://www.erosproject.com/metrocircus.html?source=ErosProject
--MikeD - 20:49, 10 March 2007 (GMT)
cost due to gravity
This statement is questionable: "The cost of building such a structure compared to earth is greatly reduced due to the 1/6 Gravity" Building infrastructure on the Moon will be extremely expensive compared to Earth. 1/6 gravity helps a little, but does not make it cheaper than Earth. Please reword this sentence. thanks.Charles F. Radley 14:14, 10 March 2007 (PST)
Restructure of Bulk/cargo/passenger and addition of new section
I've tried to restructure the proposed progression from bulk to passenger and add a section on types, but I still find the organizational structure of this article to be unsatisfactory. -- Strangelv 08:16, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
