Difference between revisions of "Talk:Carbon Economy"
Jotagiraldez (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | == Carbon importation == | ||
+ | |||
+ | Something true about the moon is its lack of carbon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Quoting ARTEMIS | ||
+ | |||
+ | "If we detected CO burps [on the moon], it would mean pockets of CO gas under pressure trapped under unfractured crust deep below. These would be as economically significant a find as polar ice fields. But don't count on it." | ||
+ | |||
+ | See http://www.asi.org/adb/m/08/08/lunar-carbon.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | We are the future carbon of the moon. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Another thing... What if we use carbon fiber on everything we send to the moon, say, lunar modules...? and other infrastructure, then later we replace that with a non-carbon something made in-situ recycling the carbon for other purposes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | That can solve the extra payload... issue. | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Jotagiraldez|Jotagiraldez]] 21:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
== Carbon economy as a title == | == Carbon economy as a title == | ||
I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Natually I can't think of a better name either. Just my 2c worth.<br> | I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Natually I can't think of a better name either. Just my 2c worth.<br> | ||
-- [[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering. | -- [[User:Mdelaney|Mdelaney]] 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering. |
Revision as of 13:59, 6 November 2010
Carbon importation
Something true about the moon is its lack of carbon.
Quoting ARTEMIS
"If we detected CO burps [on the moon], it would mean pockets of CO gas under pressure trapped under unfractured crust deep below. These would be as economically significant a find as polar ice fields. But don't count on it."
See http://www.asi.org/adb/m/08/08/lunar-carbon.html
We are the future carbon of the moon.
Another thing... What if we use carbon fiber on everything we send to the moon, say, lunar modules...? and other infrastructure, then later we replace that with a non-carbon something made in-situ recycling the carbon for other purposes.
That can solve the extra payload... issue.
--Jotagiraldez 21:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Carbon economy as a title
I'm not sure about "Carbon economy" as a title, I've been mulling this over for a while now, and I still feel the phrase "carbon economy" suggests an ecomomy based on carbon rather than economical use of carbon. Natually I can't think of a better name either. Just my 2c worth.
-- Mdelaney 23:22, 04 April 2007 (BST) Thats British Summer Time for those who have been wondering.