Difference between revisions of "Talk:ISS into the Pacific"
(Not yet) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
'''Not yet:''' | '''Not yet:''' | ||
| Line 11: | Line 10: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | This article yields no information about the moon, and from a technical standpoint, its assertion that the ISS is in the wrong orbit for access to the moon is just plain silly. It appears to be motivated by purely political intent, which again means it has no place in the Lunarpedia unless you want to open a section on Idiotic Political Smoke Screens. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Recommend deleting it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | -- Greg | ||
Revision as of 00:17, 30 April 2007
Not yet:
The great successes of the ISS, and there were many, were mostly about international politics and the dissolution of the USSR. We need to do a very large and public analysis of the contribution and weakness of the ISS program to generate the critical lessons learned we need for a large back to the Moon program.
Only after such a study is made, should we decide the fate of the ISS.
The ISS also shows us how a bad name can kill a program.
--Jriley 04:37, 10 March 2007 (PST)
This article yields no information about the moon, and from a technical standpoint, its assertion that the ISS is in the wrong orbit for access to the moon is just plain silly. It appears to be motivated by purely political intent, which again means it has no place in the Lunarpedia unless you want to open a section on Idiotic Political Smoke Screens.
Recommend deleting it.
-- Greg
