Talk:Selene Alliance

Cartography

Noting that the typeface I picked for the N to point North was something called UnPilgi Bold... -- Strangelv 12:55, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed response to attacks

1. We will deploy as _our_ _needs_ require, including but not limited to
   1. defending,
   2. liberating,
   3. occupying, or
   4. garrisoning towns of our choice.
2. Only the person attacked is allowed to counter-attack. This person may designate a counter-attacker. The designee may be anyone, regardless of score.
3. Once the original attacker attacks another member of our alliance, that second member may counter attack as well.
4. If you have a problem with a certain member of our alliance,
   1. make yourself a non-target and
   2. feel free to counter attack.

Please comment and put

~~~~

at the end to "sign" with your username.

Rose/Miros 23:57, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to me. Dcarson 00:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Seems reasonable to me also. Mdelaney 02:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Still pondering this phraseology. I actually liked the first iteration in ASI MOO better. Its bluntness gave it needed clarity.

For reference, unless I've been given advance notice to not do so, I will jump in on any occupation, blockade, or other seemingly hostile action for neighboring (and in some cases not so neighboring) allied players, especially smaller, poorly defended ones who are actively building up. If crushing the occupiers or cutting off their escape route from someplace else they're attacking is something you don't want me doing, tell me in advance. -- Strangelv 02:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed plausible deniability policy

In the event of a wider conflict between other alliances, it may sometimes be prudent overlook occupation of some of our towns as this allows plausible deniability of involvement in the conflict while still aiding our friends. This policy should be unofficial and only implemented during official wars. We should be informed of any such proposed occupation beforehand in the interests of saving our troops. This is a very gray area that needs to be discussed, and if adopted, remain unpublished.

-- Mdelaney 03:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)