Difference between revisions of "NASA TM-2004-212743"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(info)
 
m (link to Solar Power Satellites article)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/GLTRS/browse.pl?2004/TM-2004-
+
[[NASA TM-2004-212743]] - "Reinventing the Solar Power Satellite" and "Peak Power Markets for Satellite Solar Power" from the Houston IAF Congress ([[International Astronautical Federation]]). Author: [[Dr. Geoffrey A. Landis]]  
212743.html  http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/GLTRS/browse.pl?2004/TM-2004-
 
212743.html  ]
 
  
[[Dr. Geoffrey A. Landis]] analyzes the economics, noting that SPS power can be sold into
+
[http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/GLTRS/browse.pl?2004/TM-2004-212743.html  http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/GLTRS/browse.pl?2004/TM-2004-212743.html  ]
 +
 
 +
This report analyses a new approach to the design of [[Solar Power Satellites]] ("SPS"), intended to make the initial investments lower, allow the power to be sold at higher price, and increase the synergy with terrestrial solar energy production.
 +
 
 +
Dr. [[Geoffrey A. Landis]] analyzes the economics, noting that SPS power can be sold into
 
different markets at different times of the day as the demand curve
 
different markets at different times of the day as the demand curve
 
changes, by selective beaming.
 
changes, by selective beaming.
Line 16: Line 18:
  
 
Space and Ground Solar Power
 
Space and Ground Solar Power
Analyses of space solar power often assume that ground solar power is
+
Analyses of space solar power often assume that ground solar power is a competing technology, and show that space solar power is a preferable technology on a rate of return basis. In fact, however, space solar power and ground solar power are complementary
a competing technology, and show that space solar power is a
+
technologies, not competing technologies. These considerations were initially discussed in 1990 [4]. Low-cost ground solar power is a necessary precursor to space solar power: Space solar power requires low cost, high production and high efficiency solar arrays, and these
preferable technology on a rate of return basis. In fact, however,
+
technologies will make ground solar attractive for many markets. The ground solar power market, in turn, will serve develop technology and the high-volume production readiness for space solar power.
space solar power and ground solar power are complementary
+
 
technologies, not competing technologies. These considerations were
+
Since ground solar is a necessary precursor to space solar power, ananalysis of space solar power should consider how it interfaces with the ground-based solar infrastructure that will be developing on a faster scale than the space infrastructure. Some possible ways that
initially discussed in 1990 [4]. Low-cost ground solar power is a
+
this interface could be optimized include:
necessary precursor to space solar power: Space solar power requires
+
 
low cost, high production and high efficiency solar arrays, and these
+
1. Integrate solar and microwave receivers on ground. This will allow the space solar power to use the pre-existing land that has already been amortized by ground solar power receivers, and tie in to power conditioning and distribution networks that are already in place.
technologies will make ground solar attractive for many markets. The
+
 
ground solar power market, in turn, will serve develop technology and
+
2. Use solar power satellites to beam to receivers when ground solar is unavailable. By "filling in" power when ground solar is unavailable, space solar power will serve as the complement to solar.
the high-volume production readiness for space solar power.
+
 
 +
 
 +
{{Cleanup}}
  
Since ground solar is a necessary precursor to space solar power, an
 
analysis of space solar power should consider how it interfaces with
 
the ground-based solar infrastructure that will be developing on a
 
faster scale than the space infrastructure. Some possible ways that
 
this interface could be optimized
 
include:
 
  
1. Integrate solar and microwave receivers on ground. This will allow
+
==See Also==
the space solar power to use the pre-existing land that has already
 
been amortized by ground solar power receivers, and tie in to power
 
conditioning and distribution networks that are already in place.
 
  
2. Use solar power satellites to beam to receivers when ground solar
+
[[Solar Power]]
is unavailable. By "filling in" power when ground solar is
+
[[Solar Power Satellites]]
unavailable, space solar power will serve as the complement to solar.
 
  
 
[[Category:Hardware Plans]]
 
[[Category:Hardware Plans]]
 +
[[Category:Public Domain Sources]]
 +
[[Category:NASA Publications]]

Latest revision as of 07:43, 14 March 2007

NASA TM-2004-212743 - "Reinventing the Solar Power Satellite" and "Peak Power Markets for Satellite Solar Power" from the Houston IAF Congress (International Astronautical Federation). Author: Dr. Geoffrey A. Landis

http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/GLTRS/browse.pl?2004/TM-2004-212743.html

This report analyses a new approach to the design of Solar Power Satellites ("SPS"), intended to make the initial investments lower, allow the power to be sold at higher price, and increase the synergy with terrestrial solar energy production.

Dr. Geoffrey A. Landis analyzes the economics, noting that SPS power can be sold into different markets at different times of the day as the demand curve changes, by selective beaming.

My comment: Terrestrial PV are limited to daylight with relatively clear skies, unless expnsive storage systems are used, or very long distance grid transmission is employed (also expensive).

Some quotes from the Landis paper:

Synergy With Terrestrial Solar

Space and Ground Solar Power Analyses of space solar power often assume that ground solar power is a competing technology, and show that space solar power is a preferable technology on a rate of return basis. In fact, however, space solar power and ground solar power are complementary technologies, not competing technologies. These considerations were initially discussed in 1990 [4]. Low-cost ground solar power is a necessary precursor to space solar power: Space solar power requires low cost, high production and high efficiency solar arrays, and these technologies will make ground solar attractive for many markets. The ground solar power market, in turn, will serve develop technology and the high-volume production readiness for space solar power.

Since ground solar is a necessary precursor to space solar power, ananalysis of space solar power should consider how it interfaces with the ground-based solar infrastructure that will be developing on a faster scale than the space infrastructure. Some possible ways that this interface could be optimized include:

1. Integrate solar and microwave receivers on ground. This will allow the space solar power to use the pre-existing land that has already been amortized by ground solar power receivers, and tie in to power conditioning and distribution networks that are already in place.

2. Use solar power satellites to beam to receivers when ground solar is unavailable. By "filling in" power when ground solar is unavailable, space solar power will serve as the complement to solar.


Work on this article has outpaced copyediting on it. You can help Lunarpedia by formatting, editing, or tidying it.



See Also

Solar Power Solar Power Satellites