Difference between revisions of "Talk:List of Boosters"
(Let me check those lists right quick) |
(→Transition: Yes we are good to go, they are all covered. Please redirect asap. Thanks.) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Let me check those lists right quick [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 07:36, 20 January 2007 (PST) | Let me check those lists right quick [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 07:36, 20 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes we are good to go, they are all covered. Please redirect asap. Thanks. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 07:56, 20 January 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:56, 20 January 2007
The sheer number of boosters, both functioning and under development, is a tad scary isn't it? Jarogers2001 19:03, 4 January 2007 (PST)
- Indeed. The list posted by Dave is an excellent start, it covers most of those currently in service or under development. There are a lot of older vehicles which are not included, but I guess we are not interested in ancient history :-)
Charles F. Radley 12:48, 7 January 2007 (PST)
- Legacy boosters have their place, but it's not what I was thinking of when I assembled this. Create a list of those too? --Strangelv 19:16, 5 January 2007 (PST)
Transition
Is there anything left for the transition or is it now safe to turn this page into a redirect?
--Strangelv 06:53, 20 January 2007 (PST)
Let me check those lists right quick Charles F. Radley 07:36, 20 January 2007 (PST)
Yes we are good to go, they are all covered. Please redirect asap. Thanks. Charles F. Radley 07:56, 20 January 2007 (PST)
