Difference between revisions of "Talk:Show Stoppers"
Jarogers2001 (talk | contribs) (some table help. any suggestions about farenheit?) |
(Undo revision 16458 by 188.143.232.118 (talk) Only english contributions are desired.) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | + | Promble addressed, thanks | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | -- [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 07:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | | | + | |
| − | + | If there is a source of commercial revenue, public support become less important. [[User:Cfrjlr|Charles F. Radley]] 16:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == Running hot and cold == | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | "When you are '''hot''', you are '''hot'''," | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | "When you are '''not''', you are '''not'''." | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Right now, addressing Climate Change is hot, hot, hot. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Right now, returning to the Moon is cold to the point of being cryogenic. | |
| − | | | + | |
| − | + | Still the situation could sift faster than any one would expect. Welcome to the 21st century. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | --[[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 19:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | :Yes, and people and institutions who staked themselves on the bandwagon without regard to scientific credibility may find themselves permanently discredited. -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 20:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | |
| − | < | + | |
| − | + | ||
| + | ::Most of those have already been partially discredited since the 70s when the same people/organizations were predicting we'd be feeling the harsh bitter chill of an ice age right about now. It's all just an excuse for more stealth taxes, war, and higher oil and gas prices. Do I sound cynical? I sure hope so!<br> | ||
| + | -- [[User:86.42.161.20|86.42.161.20]] 22:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
| − | + | Climate change has become a horiffic fad. "Help the planet, buy brandname oven cleaner"- over cleaner made from fossil hydracarbons, uses CFC propellant and is highly toxic to marine life. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 08:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | == Children on the Moon == | |
| − | + | It is not a show stopper, but what happens to children born on the Moon? Will they develop properly? If they do, they proberbly will not be able to return to Earth. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 07:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC) | |
| + | :Research in rodent reproduction and possibly studying the development of chicken eggs in moon equivalent gravity will give us an idea, but that will require research space. - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 05:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:43, 19 August 2011
Right now the Return to the Moon movement is stopped. We will have to solve a whole string of Show Stoppers to get it going and run to completion.
--Jriley 22:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
PS -- I could use some help with this table.
Promble addressed, thanks
-- Jarogers2001 07:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
If there is a source of commercial revenue, public support become less important. Charles F. Radley 16:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Running hot and cold
"When you are hot, you are hot,"
"When you are not, you are not."
Right now, addressing Climate Change is hot, hot, hot.
Right now, returning to the Moon is cold to the point of being cryogenic.
Still the situation could sift faster than any one would expect. Welcome to the 21st century.
--Jriley 19:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, and people and institutions who staked themselves on the bandwagon without regard to scientific credibility may find themselves permanently discredited. -- Strangelv 20:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Most of those have already been partially discredited since the 70s when the same people/organizations were predicting we'd be feeling the harsh bitter chill of an ice age right about now. It's all just an excuse for more stealth taxes, war, and higher oil and gas prices. Do I sound cynical? I sure hope so!
- Most of those have already been partially discredited since the 70s when the same people/organizations were predicting we'd be feeling the harsh bitter chill of an ice age right about now. It's all just an excuse for more stealth taxes, war, and higher oil and gas prices. Do I sound cynical? I sure hope so!
-- 86.42.161.20 22:10, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Climate change has become a horiffic fad. "Help the planet, buy brandname oven cleaner"- over cleaner made from fossil hydracarbons, uses CFC propellant and is highly toxic to marine life. T.Neo 08:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Children on the Moon
It is not a show stopper, but what happens to children born on the Moon? Will they develop properly? If they do, they proberbly will not be able to return to Earth. T.Neo 07:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Research in rodent reproduction and possibly studying the development of chicken eggs in moon equivalent gravity will give us an idea, but that will require research space. - Jarogers2001 05:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
