Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tether"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(moved to here froim ain content page)
(Restoring the tether article)
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
==Tethers versus Mass Drivers==
 
==Tethers versus Mass Drivers==
 
There is an incorrect statement on exoplatz at http://www.exoplatz.org/index.php?title=Tether.  It is written: "It (a tether) has an advantage over mass driver in that it can be used to soft land on the Moon as well as depart from the Moon."  When one considers that a mass driver can be built in orbit around Luna, it is not hard to see how a mass driver can be used to soft land cargo on Luna.  A mass driver can orbit as close to a Lunar mountain peak as a tether can.  If it accelerates cargo to the rear at orbital velocity relative to itself as it goes past a mountain peak, that cargo is brought to a stop relative to Luna.  Further, there is no physical law that would be broken to develop (at some future time) the ability for cargo in orbit to rendezvous with a carrier on Luna travling on a magnetically levitating track at orbital velocity and then slowing the cargo to a stop by regenerative braking (hopefully before reaching the end of the track).  --[[User:Farred|Farred]] 01:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 
There is an incorrect statement on exoplatz at http://www.exoplatz.org/index.php?title=Tether.  It is written: "It (a tether) has an advantage over mass driver in that it can be used to soft land on the Moon as well as depart from the Moon."  When one considers that a mass driver can be built in orbit around Luna, it is not hard to see how a mass driver can be used to soft land cargo on Luna.  A mass driver can orbit as close to a Lunar mountain peak as a tether can.  If it accelerates cargo to the rear at orbital velocity relative to itself as it goes past a mountain peak, that cargo is brought to a stop relative to Luna.  Further, there is no physical law that would be broken to develop (at some future time) the ability for cargo in orbit to rendezvous with a carrier on Luna travling on a magnetically levitating track at orbital velocity and then slowing the cargo to a stop by regenerative braking (hopefully before reaching the end of the track).  --[[User:Farred|Farred]] 01:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Restoring the tether article==
 +
I deleted the Tether article some time ago when the link to Exoplatz corrupted and led users to spam pages.  This is discussed at [[User:Farred#note for problem article]] where Strangelv describes fixing the problem.  I restored other articles previously but must have missed Tether, so I restored it now.  - [[User:Farred|Farred]] 06:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:19, 6 September 2012

What is the purpose of redirecting this page?


I'm not sure I see a purpose in moving it either. There will be many different applications for tethers and some of those will be Luna specific. -- Mdelaney 20:39, 16 April 2007 (UTC)


Tethers versus Mass Drivers

There is an incorrect statement on exoplatz at http://www.exoplatz.org/index.php?title=Tether. It is written: "It (a tether) has an advantage over mass driver in that it can be used to soft land on the Moon as well as depart from the Moon." When one considers that a mass driver can be built in orbit around Luna, it is not hard to see how a mass driver can be used to soft land cargo on Luna. A mass driver can orbit as close to a Lunar mountain peak as a tether can. If it accelerates cargo to the rear at orbital velocity relative to itself as it goes past a mountain peak, that cargo is brought to a stop relative to Luna. Further, there is no physical law that would be broken to develop (at some future time) the ability for cargo in orbit to rendezvous with a carrier on Luna travling on a magnetically levitating track at orbital velocity and then slowing the cargo to a stop by regenerative braking (hopefully before reaching the end of the track). --Farred 01:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Restoring the tether article

I deleted the Tether article some time ago when the link to Exoplatz corrupted and led users to spam pages. This is discussed at User:Farred#note for problem article where Strangelv describes fixing the problem. I restored other articles previously but must have missed Tether, so I restored it now. - Farred 06:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)