Difference between revisions of "User talk:75.73.69.17"

From Lunarpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "Unfortunately the new LRO data makes the approach shown in this architecture unlikely to address the radiation exposure problem sufficiently. I am working on a radical solution ...")
 
(talk)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Tom Riley
 
Tom Riley
 
TomRiley@WoodwareDesigns.com
 
TomRiley@WoodwareDesigns.com
 +
<small>The above comment was posted by:</small> [[User:Jriley|Jriley]] 22:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
 +
:Hi Jriley,
 +
:Maybe we have a new contributor in user:75.73.69.17.  I think the Architecture as Mole Hills is sound with respect to radiation shielding if the regolith covering referred to in the text is 5 meters or more thick.  The thickness is specified as 7 meters, so it should be enough.  The article could use some technical updating as could many articles.  - [[User:Farred|Farred]] 01:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 18:14, 22 July 2012

Unfortunately the new LRO data makes the approach shown in this architecture unlikely to address the radiation exposure problem sufficiently. I am working on a radical solution but it is for a Mars mission. These arguments are rather long and I am currently preparing a related e-book. Please e-mail me if you are interested in somewhat length arguments in this area.

Tom Riley TomRiley@WoodwareDesigns.com The above comment was posted by: Jriley 22:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jriley,
Maybe we have a new contributor in user:75.73.69.17. I think the Architecture as Mole Hills is sound with respect to radiation shielding if the regolith covering referred to in the text is 5 meters or more thick. The thickness is specified as 7 meters, so it should be enough. The article could use some technical updating as could many articles. - Farred 01:14, 23 July 2012 (UTC)