Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sandworms"
(definding the name) |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't have a problem with the name, I am not familiar to the Dune books at all, But this thing reminds me of how Earthworms digest food. Maybe we could tone down the Dune referances, otherwise it is fine. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 10:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:18, 31 July 2008
What's in a name?
Making up good names is important to getting a project started. Giving thins a name makes them more real. Early adopters and enthusiast love an inside joke and will work just to make the name happen. If you have better names for things than I have bring them forward.
A bad name can kill a project. Our space station when through many redesigns and changed its name with each. Started out as Eagle and ended up as the International Space Station. I am sure it was that last name that killed it.
Thanks, --Jriley 15:39, 15 March 2007 (PDT)
- I fear the name is confusing. In Herbert's science fiction series, sandworms are desert-dwelling creatures. But they do not collect spice; they (sandtrout, the haploid form) create it. Eventually by-products of the production build up and explode in a spice blow that releases the spice onto the surface of the desert. The confusion comes from the existence in the Dune universe of large harvesting machines, much like those described here, which are not called sandworms. I wish I had a good alternate suggestion for you! Sdsds 03:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, calling this machine a harvester would be more correct, but not as much fun.
I have added a sketch of the cutting head at the end to show the three fold rows of large, sharp, hard teeth. I think that this type of front end, which is common for such machines on Earth, would justify calling the manchine a Sandworm.
--Jriley 16:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with the name, I am not familiar to the Dune books at all, But this thing reminds me of how Earthworms digest food. Maybe we could tone down the Dune referances, otherwise it is fine. T.Neo 10:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
